INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS

For growth investors, PDF Solutions, Inc.

(PDFS) is the stronger pick with 22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX). DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) offers the better valuation at 32. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Box, Inc. (BOX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, DocuSign, Inc.

(DOCU) is the cheapest at 32. 6x versus Box, Inc. at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, DocuSign, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, PDF Solutions, Inc.

(PDFS) delivered a total return of +149. 9%, compared to -75. 3% for DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDFS returned +299. 9% versus INLX's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellinetics, Inc.

(INLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus PDF Solutions, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning PDFS is approximately -607% more volatile than INLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 39% for Box, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PDF Solutions, Inc.

(PDFS) is pulling ahead at 22. 0% versus 6. 7% for Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Box, Inc. grew EPS -56. 6% year-over-year, compared to -218. 2% for Intellinetics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INLX leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DocuSign, Inc.

(DOCU) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -3. 0% for Intellinetics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCU leads at 9. 3% versus -1. 0% for INLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCU leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, DocuSign, Inc.

(DOCU) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 7x for PDF Solutions, Inc. — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOCU: 42. 5% to $68. 67.

In this comparison, BOX (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. INLX, DOCU, PDFS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellinetics, Inc.

(INLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INLX: -99. 8%, PDFS: +299. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: INLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PDFS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.