Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $32M | $9.53B | $3.70B | $1.90B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $3.22B | $1.18B | $231M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $309M | $101M | $7M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 79.4% | 79.2% | 72.5% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -9.6% | 9.3% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.7x | 20.0x | 42.7x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $185M | $77M | $77M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $602M | $375M | $42M | $30.24B |
INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) | 100 | 34.3 | -65.7% |
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) | 100 | 302.6 | +202.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, INLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DOCU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 25.3x)
BOX is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.49 vs PDFS's 2.21
PDFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 269.5% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.9%
- 22.0% revenue growth vs INLX's 6.7%
- +149.7% vs INLX's -50.9%
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.0% revenue growth vs INLX's 6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs INLX's -10.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs PDFS's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs BOX's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.7% vs INLX's -50.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs INLX's -9.6%, ROIC 24.9% vs -1.0% |
INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCU leads in 1 of 6 categories
PDFS leads 1 • MSFT leads 1 • INLX leads 0 • BOX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DOCU and PDFS and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 19243.0x INLX's $17M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INLX's -10.4%. On growth, PDFS holds the edge at +25.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $3.2B | $1.2B | $231M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$315,994 | $525M | $120M | $23M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $309M | $101M | $7M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $994,076 | $1.1B | $350M | -$18M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +79.4% | +79.2% | +72.5% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +9.3% | +7.1% | +6.8% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +9.6% | +8.6% | +3.1% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +32.9% | +29.8% | -7.8% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | +7.8% | +9.4% | +25.9% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +12.8% | -58.0% | +2.5% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
DOCU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 29% valuation discount to BOX's 43.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DOCU's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PDFS's 112.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $9.5B | $3.7B | $1.9B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $9.1B | $3.4B | $1.9B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -54.62x | 32.56x | 43.55x | -2926.38x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.73x | 19.96x | 42.68x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.02x | 17.35x | 28.32x | 112.71x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 2.96x | 3.15x | 8.69x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.81x | 5.14x | 19.09x | 6.92x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.49x | 9.00x | 10.57x | — | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DOCU and BOX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOX delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-16 for INLX. DOCU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOX's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOX scores 7/9 vs PDFS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.6% | +15.6% | +47.9% | +2.7% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +7.7% | +6.3% | +1.7% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +15.0% | +64.7% | +1.9% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +13.7% | +11.2% | +1.9% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.10x | 0.39x | 0.28x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$417M | -$298M | $34M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $602M | $375M | $42M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $185M | $77M | $77M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.28x | 131.77x | 9.68x | 3.85x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PDFS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PDFS five years ago would be worth $24,987 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,468 for DOCU. Over the past 12 months, PDFS leads with a +149.7% total return vs INLX's -50.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INLX at 18.9% vs BOX's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.9% | -25.7% | -10.9% | +61.4% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.9% | -41.4% | -17.0% | +149.7% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.2% | -2.3% | -4.4% | +23.0% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.5% | -75.3% | +21.4% | +149.9% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +21.3% | +121.9% | +269.5% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | -0.8% | -1.5% | +7.1% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INLX and PDFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDFS's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDFS currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs INLX's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.44x | 0.95x | 0.42x | 2.25x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.00 | $94.67 | $38.80 | $50.44 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.74 | $40.16 | $21.34 | $17.35 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +50.9% | +66.2% | +94.6% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 48.8 | 50.5 | 70.3 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 4.3M | 2.4M | 403K | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOCU as "Hold", BOX as "Buy", PDFS as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.5% upside for DOCU (target: $69) vs 0.6% for PDFS (target: $48). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs BOX's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.67 | $34.67 | $48.00 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 28 | 5 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 5 | 1 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.10 | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.1% | +7.8% | +0.0% | +0.6% |
DOCU leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PDFS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
INLX vs DOCU vs BOX vs PDFS vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PDF Solutions, Inc.
(PDFS) is the stronger pick with 22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Box, Inc. (BOX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Box, Inc. at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, DocuSign, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, PDF Solutions, Inc.
(PDFS) delivered a total return of +149. 9%, compared to -75. 3% for DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +776. 0% versus INLX's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellinetics, Inc.
(INLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus PDF Solutions, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning PDFS is approximately -607% more volatile than INLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 39% for Box, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PDF Solutions, Inc.
(PDFS) is pulling ahead at 22. 0% versus 6. 7% for Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microsoft Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -218. 2% for Intellinetics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INLX leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -3. 0% for Intellinetics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -1. 0% for INLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCU leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, DocuSign, Inc.
(DOCU) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 7x for PDF Solutions, Inc. — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOCU: 42. 5% to $68. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), BOX (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. INLX, DOCU, PDFS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INLX or DOCU or BOX or PDFS or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellinetics, Inc.
(INLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INLX: -99. 8%, PDFS: +299. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INLX and DOCU and BOX and PDFS and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PDFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while INLX, DOCU, BOX, PDFS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.