REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Industrial
INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $17.37B | $149.25B | $24.68B | $25.85B | $132.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.79B | $11.63B | $3.12B | $3.04B | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $583M | $1.43B | $954M | $1.05B | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 39.1% | 46.3% | 67.0% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 31.2% | 4.4% | 28.5% | 30.1% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 40.0x | 78.4x | 50.6x | 37.7x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $8.38B | $21.38B | $8.78B | $9.33B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $5.03B | $56M | $187M | $1.32B |
INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invitation Homes In… (INVH) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INVH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 4.0%
- PEG 1.79 vs EQR's 9.94
- Beta 0.27, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.52x
- Lower P/E (40.0x vs 41.4x), PEG 1.79 vs 3.83
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2%
- Beta 0.13 vs PLD's 0.73, lower leverage
EQR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%
AVB is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 4.8% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 0.5%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 259.1% 10Y total return vs WELL's 223.1%
- 36.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (40.0x vs 41.4x), PEG 1.79 vs 3.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs PLD's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs INVH's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 0.5% |
INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLD leads in 1 of 6 categories
INVH leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • EQR leads 0 • AVB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 4.2x INVH's $2.8B. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $11.6B | $3.1B | $3.0B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $2.8B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $583M | $1.4B | $954M | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $2.5B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.0% | +39.1% | +46.3% | +67.0% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +4.4% | +28.5% | +30.1% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +12.3% | +30.6% | +34.6% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +21.9% | +42.7% | +49.7% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +40.3% | +2.5% | +3.7% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +22.5% | -64.2% | -40.9% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
INVH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EQR trades at a 85% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INVH offers better value at 1.35x vs AVB's 5.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.4B | $149.2B | $24.7B | $25.8B | $132.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.6B | $165.6B | $33.4B | $35.0B | $162.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.19x | 153.25x | 22.63x | 25.14x | 35.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.02x | 78.42x | 50.61x | 37.72x | 41.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.35x | — | 4.44x | 5.37x | 3.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.22x | 66.40x | 15.61x | 19.15x | 23.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.37x | 13.99x | 7.96x | 8.51x | 16.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.86x | 3.35x | 2.24x | 2.23x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.03x | 52.41x | 19.13x | 18.28x | 26.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — INVH and EQR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVB delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVH's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INVH scores 7/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +3.5% | +8.4% | +8.8% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +2.3% | +4.6% | +4.8% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +0.5% | +4.2% | +3.3% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +0.6% | +5.7% | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.49x | 0.77x | 0.79x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.3B | $16.3B | $8.7B | $9.1B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $5.0B | $56M | $187M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $21.4B | $8.8B | $9.3B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.05x | 0.26x | 5.58x | 5.07x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,789 for INVH. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs INVH's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs INVH's -1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.6% | +14.3% | +8.4% | +3.9% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.6% | +42.7% | -2.7% | -7.2% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.1% | +189.5% | +17.5% | +14.4% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.1% | +202.3% | +6.7% | +12.1% | +37.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.2% | +223.1% | +29.3% | +31.6% | +259.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | +42.5% | +5.5% | +4.6% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs INVH's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.13x | 0.38x | 0.48x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.25 | $219.59 | $71.80 | $209.86 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.25 | $142.65 | $57.58 | $160.09 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +97.0% | +91.7% | +88.5% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.5 | 60.2 | 69.8 | 71.2 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.8M | 2.6M | 2.4M | 940K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EQR and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INVH as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", EQR as "Hold", AVB as "Hold", PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.2% upside for INVH (target: $32) vs 1.5% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, EQR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.22 | $226.50 | $70.15 | $191.70 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 34 | 46 | 42 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +1.3% | +4.1% | +3.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.16 | $2.76 | $2.69 | $6.99 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.9% | +0.0% |
PLD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). INVH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
INVH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB vs PLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (50. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD?
On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Invitation Homes Inc. wins at 1. 79x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -2. 1% for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +259. 1% versus EQR's +29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 450% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 88% for Invitation Homes Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Invitation Homes Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 79x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 78. 4x for Welltower Inc. — 40. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVH: 11. 2% to $32. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Equity Residential (EQR) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is INVH or WELL or EQR or AVB or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, PLD: +259. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INVH and WELL and EQR and AVB and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INVH is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.