Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IOR
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$73M
5Y Perf.+71.4%
ARL
American Realty Investors, Inc.

Real Estate - Development

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$223M
5Y Perf.+83.8%
TCI
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.+81.4%
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

REIT - Residential

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$756M
5Y Perf.-6.8%
UMH
UMH Properties, Inc.

REIT - Residential

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.35B
5Y Perf.+27.2%

IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IOR logoIOR
ARL logoARL
TCI logoTCI
NXRT logoNXRT
UMH logoUMH
IndustryFinancial - MortgagesReal Estate - DevelopmentReal Estate - ServicesREIT - ResidentialREIT - Residential
Market Cap$73M$223M$317M$756M$1.35B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$50M$49M$252M$201M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$13M$9M$-32M$22M
Gross Margin-36.9%-38.7%91.1%37.2%
Operating Margin-11.2%-11.6%11.5%18.0%
Forward P/E18.3x0.7x22.9x149.8x
Total Debt$0.00$214M$211M$1.56B$761M
Cash & Equiv.$6K$14M$14M$14M$72M

IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IOR
ARL
TCI
NXRT
UMH
StockMay 20May 26Return
Income Opportunity … (IOR)100171.4+71.4%
American Realty Inv… (ARL)100183.8+83.8%
Transcontinental Re… (TCI)100181.4+81.4%
NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT)10093.2-6.8%
UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH)100127.2+27.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IOR and ARL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. American Realty Investors, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. TCI and NXRT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IOR
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
The Banking Pick

IOR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and efficiency.

  • Beta 0.21 vs ARL's 1.00
  • 3.2% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.2% vs 1.1%
Best for: stability and efficiency
ARL
American Realty Investors, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

ARL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.06 vs TCI's 1.45
  • Lower P/E (0.7x vs 149.8x)
  • 25.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
Best for: valuation efficiency
TCI
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

TCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 135.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
  • 324.2% 10Y total return vs ARL's 197.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 24.3%, current ratio 871.66x
  • 9.6% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
  • Beta 0.62, yield 7.1%, current ratio 0.48x
  • 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
UMH
UMH Properties, Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, UMH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTCI logoTCI9.6% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0%
ValueARL logoARLLower P/E (0.7x vs 149.8x)
Quality / MarginsARL logoARL25.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
Stability / SafetyIOR logoIORBeta 0.21 vs ARL's 1.00
DividendsNXRT logoNXRT7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TCI logoTCI+18.5% vs NXRT's -15.2%
Efficiency (ROA)IOR logoIOR3.2% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.2% vs 1.1%

IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IORIncome Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
FY 2017
Other
50.0%$250,000
Total Segments
50.0%$250,000
ARLAmerican Realty Investors, Inc.
FY 2025
Residential Segment
69.6%$34M
Commercial Segments
30.4%$15M
TCITranscontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
FY 2025
Residential Segment
69.6%$34M
CommercialSegmentsMember
30.4%$15M
NXRTNexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UMHUMH Properties, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIORLAGGINGUMH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARL and UMH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

NXRT and IOR operate at a comparable scale, with $252M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, ARL holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIOR logoIORIncome Opportunit…ARL logoARLAmerican Realty I…TCI logoTCITranscontinental …NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…UMH logoUMHUMH Properties, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$50M$49M$252M$201M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$5M$5M$125M$86M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$13M$9M-$32M$22M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$338,000$3M-$51M$79M$87M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-36.9%-38.7%+91.1%+37.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-11.2%-11.6%+11.5%+18.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.2%+18.9%-12.7%+10.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.4%-104.2%+31.2%+43.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%+2.8%+0.5%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.2%-116.7%-96.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — ARL and UMH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ARL and NXRT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.2x trailing earnings, ARL trades at a 94% valuation discount to UMH's 226.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARL offers better value at 1.23x vs TCI's 1.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricIOR logoIORIncome Opportunit…ARL logoARLAmerican Realty I…TCI logoTCITranscontinental …NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…UMH logoUMHUMH Properties, I…
Market CapShares × price$73M$223M$317M$756M$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$73M$423M$513M$2.3B$2.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.33x14.23x22.91x-23.65x226.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.66x149.81x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.23x1.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.46x68.82x82.37x18.60x18.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.46x6.45x3.01x5.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.58x0.27x0.37x2.52x1.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.05x16.51x
Evenly matched — ARL and NXRT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IOR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IOR delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. TCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMH scores 6/9 vs IOR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIOR logoIORIncome Opportunit…ARL logoARLAmerican Realty I…TCI logoTCITranscontinental …NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…UMH logoUMHUMH Properties, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+1.6%+1.1%-10.1%+2.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.2%+1.2%+0.8%-1.7%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.2%-0.5%-0.5%+1.1%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%-0.6%-0.6%+1.5%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–923546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x0.24x5.18x0.84x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6,000$200M$197M$1.5B$689M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6,000$14M$14M$14M$72M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$214M$211M$1.6B$761M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.11x4.22x0.47x1.89x
IOR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — IOR and TCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARL five years ago would be worth $17,692 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, TCI leads with a +18.5% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOR at 18.5% vs ARL's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIOR logoIORIncome Opportunit…ARL logoARLAmerican Realty I…TCI logoTCITranscontinental …NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…UMH logoUMHUMH Properties, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.3%-15.0%-37.8%+2.6%+1.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.9%+9.1%+18.5%-15.2%-3.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+66.3%-27.7%+4.7%-15.5%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.7%+76.9%+72.8%-23.0%-9.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.5%+197.4%+324.2%+211.1%+139.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.5%-10.2%+1.5%-5.5%+6.0%
Evenly matched — IOR and TCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

IOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

IOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARL's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IOR currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs TCI's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIOR logoIORIncome Opportunit…ARL logoARLAmerican Realty I…TCI logoTCITranscontinental …NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…UMH logoUMHUMH Properties, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.21x1.00x0.75x0.62x0.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.69$20.00$59.65$38.30$17.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.50$11.95$29.26$23.79$13.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+69.0%+61.4%+77.8%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.440.346.471.058.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6923K7K216K621K
IOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", UMH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.9% upside for UMH (target: $17) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs UMH's 5.25%.

MetricIOR logoIORIncome Opportunit…ARL logoARLAmerican Realty I…TCI logoTCITranscontinental …NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…UMH logoUMHUMH Properties, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.00$16.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1015
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.1%+5.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000126
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.11$0.83
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%+0.3%+1.0%+0.4%
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IOR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). NXRT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallIncome Opportunity Realty I… (IOR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IOR vs ARL vs TCI vs NXRT vs UMH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.

(TCI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (0. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH?

On trailing P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus UMH Properties, Inc. at 226. 9x. On forward P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH?

Over the past 5 years, American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) delivered a total return of +76. 9%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCI returned +324. 2% versus UMH's +139. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

(IOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus American Realty Investors, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning ARL is approximately 368% more volatile than IOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.

(TCI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 206. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCI leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH?

American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UMH leads at 17. 4% versus -12. 9% for TCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 149. 8x for UMH Properties, Inc. — 149. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UMH: 3. 9% to $16. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH?

In this comparison, NXRT (7.

1% yield), UMH (5. 2% yield) pay a dividend. IOR, ARL, TCI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IOR or ARL or TCI or NXRT or UMH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, UMH Properties, Inc.

(UMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 2% yield, +139. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UMH: +139. 1%, ARL: +197. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IOR and ARL and TCI and NXRT and UMH?

These companies operate in different sectors (IOR (Financial Services) and ARL (Real Estate) and TCI (Real Estate) and NXRT (Real Estate) and UMH (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARL is a small-cap deep-value stock; TCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UMH is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NXRT, UMH pay a dividend while IOR, ARL, TCI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IOR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TCI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UMH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IOR and ARL and TCI and NXRT and UMH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IOR: -100.0% · ARL: 2.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(IOR: 18.3x · ARL: 14.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.