Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Retail
IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $73M | $57.62B | $8.47B | $7.39B | $2.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $5.92B | $936M | $864M | $227M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $800M | $387M | $244M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.6% | 81.4% | 61.8% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.3% | 63.3% | 37.9% | 58.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 37.1x | 21.7x | 38.1x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $32.85B | $4.82B | $3.29B | $1.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6K | $435M | $5M | $15M | $13M |
IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income Opportunity … (IOR) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| STAG Industrial, In… (STAG) | 100 | 143.7 | +43.7% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 155.5% 10Y total return vs STAG's 147.9%
Among these 5 stocks, O doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.94 vs STAG's 18.70
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 22.0x)
- 41.4% margin vs IOR's 4.3%
STAG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0%
GTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 98.5%, current ratio 29.85x
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.8%, current ratio 29.85x
- Beta 0.05 vs STAG's 0.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 22.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs IOR's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs STAG's 0.55 | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.6% vs IOR's +0.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs O's 1.1%, ROIC 4.6% vs 1.8% |
IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOR leads 1 • O leads 0 • STAG leads 0 • GTY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O and IOR operate at a comparable scale, with $5.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 13.5%. On growth, O holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $5.9B | $936M | $864M | $227M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $4.2B | $867M | $634M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $800M | $387M | $244M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$338,000 | $4.0B | $464M | $443M | $131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +68.6% | +81.4% | +61.8% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +29.3% | +63.3% | +37.9% | +58.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.5% | +41.4% | +28.3% | +40.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +67.1% | +49.6% | +51.2% | +57.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.2% | +4.1% | +9.1% | +10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | -103.6% | -2.0% | -34.7% | +76.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IOR and NNN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, IOR trades at a 65% valuation discount to O's 52.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.93x vs O's 71.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $57.6B | $8.5B | $7.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $90.0B | $13.3B | $10.7B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.33x | 52.81x | 21.50x | 26.48x | 24.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.13x | 21.69x | 38.07x | 21.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 71.28x | 1.93x | 13.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.46x | 21.96x | 15.85x | 17.20x | 16.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.02x | 9.14x | 8.75x | 9.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 1.39x | 1.90x | 1.98x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.91x | 12.69x | 18.40x | 15.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for O. O carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NNN's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), O scores 5/9 vs IOR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +2.0% | +8.8% | +6.8% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +1.1% | +4.1% | +3.5% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +1.8% | +4.8% | +3.5% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +2.4% | +6.4% | +4.9% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.82x | 1.09x | 0.90x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6,000 | $32.4B | $4.8B | $3.3B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6,000 | $435M | $5M | $15M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $32.9B | $4.8B | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 2.93x | 3.04x | 2.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IOR five years ago would be worth $14,566 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,498 for NNN. Over the past 12 months, GTY leads with a +23.6% total return vs IOR's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOR at 18.5% vs GTY's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +9.7% | +15.6% | +5.8% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | +14.6% | +12.4% | +19.8% | +23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.3% | +13.6% | +15.1% | +21.8% | +12.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +16.9% | +15.0% | +26.4% | +32.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.5% | +45.1% | +37.8% | +147.9% | +133.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | +4.3% | +4.8% | +6.8% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and GTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STAG's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs O's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.09x | 0.15x | 0.55x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.69 | $67.94 | $46.03 | $39.99 | $34.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.50 | $54.38 | $38.90 | $33.19 | $25.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +90.9% | +96.7% | +96.7% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 53.9 | 58.4 | 51.5 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 692 | 5.6M | 1.5M | 1.2M | 415K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — O and GTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: O as "Hold", NNN as "Hold", STAG as "Buy", GTY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.7% upside for STAG (target: $46) vs 3.0% for GTY (target: $34). For income investors, GTY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.83% vs STAG's 3.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $65.25 | $46.06 | $45.50 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 29 | 21 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.2% | +5.3% | +3.9% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.23 | $2.36 | $1.51 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IOR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
IOR vs O vs NNN vs STAG vs GTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY?
On trailing P/E, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(IOR) is the cheapest at 18. 3x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Realty Income Corporation's 71. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY?
Over the past 5 years, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(IOR) delivered a total return of +45. 7%, compared to +15. 0% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IOR returned +155. 5% versus NNN's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 0. 55β — meaning STAG is approximately 950% more volatile than GTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Realty Income Corporation (O) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 109% for NNN REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: STAG Industrial, Inc. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 0. 0% for IOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Realty Income Corporation's 71. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 38. 1x for STAG Industrial, Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STAG: 17. 7% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY?
In this comparison, GTY (5.
8% yield), NNN (5. 3% yield), O (5. 2% yield), STAG (3. 9% yield) pay a dividend. IOR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOR or O or NNN or STAG or GTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 5. 8% yield, +133. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTY: +133. 4%, IOR: +155. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOR and O and NNN and STAG and GTY?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOR (Financial Services) and O (Real Estate) and NNN (Real Estate) and STAG (Real Estate) and GTY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STAG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GTY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. O, NNN, STAG, GTY pay a dividend while IOR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.