Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $185M | $3.94B | $1.24B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $24M | $1.23B | $894M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $7M | $119M | $61M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 76.7% | 85.0% | 89.2% | 69.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 30.2% | -0.1% | 8.6% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 59.3x | 27.8x | 19.0x | 7.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $510K | $312M | $448M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $29M | $1.50B | $216M | $30.24B |
IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 107.1 | +7.1% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
| Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1%
TRAK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Beta 1.15, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.09x
Among these 5 stocks, MNDY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VRNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.36 vs MSFT's 1.35
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.35
- 1.6% yield, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +17.9% vs MNDY's -72.3%
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 14.5%
- 39.3% margin vs IOT's -0.6%
- Beta 0.89 vs IOT's 1.46
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs IOT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs IOT's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs MNDY's -72.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs IOT's -0.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs -3.8% |
IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRNT leads in 1 of 6 categories
TRAK leads 1 • IOT leads 0 • MNDY leads 0 • MSFT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IOT and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 13542.2x TRAK's $24M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IOT's -0.6%. On growth, IOT holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $24M | $1.2B | $894M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | $8M | $12M | $127M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $7M | $119M | $61M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $7M | $321M | $118M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +85.0% | +89.2% | +69.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +30.2% | -0.1% | +8.6% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +30.9% | +9.6% | +6.9% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +29.1% | +26.0% | +13.2% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +6.7% | +24.6% | -1.0% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +13.2% | +2.3% | -5.1% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
VRNT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, VRNT trades at a 42% valuation discount to MNDY's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $185M | $3.9B | $1.2B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $157M | $2.7B | $1.5B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1505.50x | 29.01x | 34.10x | 19.72x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.34x | 27.82x | 19.01x | 7.00x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x | — | 1.02x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.98x | 227.80x | 9.46x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.02x | 8.18x | 3.20x | 1.37x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.16x | 3.93x | 3.25x | 0.97x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.17x | 22.01x | 12.57x | 8.75x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TRAK and MSFT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-1 for IOT. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNT's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOT scores 7/9 vs MNDY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +14.6% | +9.5% | +4.6% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +12.9% | +5.6% | +2.8% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +21.4% | -2.4% | +5.3% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +12.9% | -0.1% | +5.9% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.01x | 0.25x | 0.34x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | -$28M | -$1.2B | $233M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $29M | $1.5B | $216M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $509,973 | $312M | $448M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 165.50x | — | 8.24x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $21,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,271 for MNDY. Over the past 12 months, VRNT leads with a +17.9% total return vs MNDY's -72.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRAK at 17.7% vs VRNT's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -14.1% | -46.7% | — | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.2% | -52.5% | -72.3% | +17.9% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +63.0% | -38.6% | -39.3% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +110.3% | -57.3% | -56.1% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +14.5% | -57.3% | -37.1% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +17.7% | -15.0% | -15.3% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRNT and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOT's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRNT currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs MNDY's 24.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.15x | 1.19x | 1.26x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.41 | $23.72 | $316.98 | $22.84 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $6.94 | $57.50 | $16.23 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +42.8% | +24.1% | +89.8% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 63.8 | 56.5 | 68.4 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 161K | 1.5M | 0 | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VRNT and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOT as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy", MNDY as "Buy", VRNT as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 31.1% for MSFT (target: $552). For income investors, VRNT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.56% vs MSFT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.82 | $24.00 | $133.00 | $32.57 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 1 | 25 | 16 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | +1.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | — | $0.32 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | +3.4% | +5.8% | +0.6% |
VRNT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TRAK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
IOT vs TRAK vs MNDY vs VRNT vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Verint Systems Inc.
(VRNT) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus monday. com Ltd. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Verint Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Verint Systems Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -57. 3% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus MNDY's -57. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Samsara Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning IOT is approximately 64% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 34% for Verint Systems Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verint Systems Inc. grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -0. 6% for Samsara Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -3. 2% for IOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Samsara Inc. — 52. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT?
In this comparison, VRNT (1.
6% yield), TRAK (0. 9% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. IOT, MNDY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOT or TRAK or MNDY or VRNT or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, IOT: +21. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOT and TRAK and MNDY and VRNT and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDY is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. TRAK, VRNT, MSFT pay a dividend while IOT, MNDY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.