Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $89M | $513M | $2.38B | $587M | $869M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $344M | $867M | $251M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $32M | $169M | $39M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 44.1% | 72.1% | 49.1% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 9.0% | 25.3% | 16.1% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 13.1x | 10.9x | 10.4x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $1.26B | $327M | $760M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $167M | $185M | $168M | $51M |
IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) | 100 | 166.0 | +66.0% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 122.0 | +22.0% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 137.7 | +37.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IROQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 140.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 89.1%, current ratio 0.00x
- Beta 0.03 vs NFBK's 0.90, lower leverage
KRNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.82, yield 5.4%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.1%
- 104.0% 10Y total return vs TRST's 99.2%
- PEG 1.55 vs TRST's 4.72
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.1% vs NBTB's +8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 17.1x), PEG 1.55 vs 4.72 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs NFBK's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.1% vs NBTB's +8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRST leads 1 • IROQ leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • NFBK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 17.9x IROQ's $48M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $344M | $867M | $251M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $43M | $241M | $61M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $32M | $169M | $39M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $40M | $225M | $42M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +44.1% | +72.1% | +49.1% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +9.0% | +25.3% | +16.1% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +7.6% | +19.5% | +11.9% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +6.2% | +25.2% | +11.9% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.0% | +50.0% | +39.5% | +68.8% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 30% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.95x vs TRST's 4.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $513M | $2.4B | $587M | $869M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $142M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.38x | 19.43x | 13.69x | 19.50x | 15.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.06x | 10.94x | 10.40x | 17.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.95x | — | 4.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.69x | 44.66x | 10.46x | 24.17x | 11.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.84x | 1.49x | 2.74x | 2.34x | 3.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 0.69x | 1.22x | 0.83x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.65x | 23.99x | 10.87x | 19.60x | 19.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +5.5% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +0.7% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +2.5% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 1.68x | 0.17x | 1.08x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $53M | $1.1B | $142M | $592M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $167M | $185M | $168M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $1.3B | $327M | $760M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.26x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.46x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,045 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.1% total return vs NBTB's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRST at 24.0% vs KRNY's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | +14.0% | +10.5% | +26.2% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.0% | +35.0% | +8.6% | +28.3% | +60.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.2% | +33.8% | +55.7% | +65.4% | +90.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | -19.6% | +33.5% | +1.1% | +49.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.5% | -8.4% | +104.0% | +20.5% | +99.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | +10.2% | +15.9% | +18.3% | +24.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IROQ and TRST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IROQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs IROQ's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.82x | 0.88x | 0.90x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.00 | $8.50 | $46.92 | $14.21 | $49.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.21 | $5.76 | $39.20 | $9.90 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +96.0% | +97.2% | +98.8% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 54.5 | 56.2 | 57.6 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 301K | 237K | 257K | 110K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRNY as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", NFBK as "Hold", TRST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs 0.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs IROQ's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.50 | $46.00 | $14.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 | 9 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +3.7% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | $0.44 | $1.43 | $0.52 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +3.2% | +4.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TRST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
IROQ vs KRNY vs NBTB vs NFBK vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 7x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +49.
0%, compared to -19. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +104. 0% versus KRNY's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning NFBK is approximately 2955% more volatile than IROQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IF Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 16. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 1. 5% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ).
09Is IROQ or KRNY or NBTB or NFBK or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IROQ: +59. 5%, NFBK: +20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IROQ and KRNY and NBTB and NFBK and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IROQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.