Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ITRM vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ITRM vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $7.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $390K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-303M |
| Gross Margin | -171.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -52.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $46M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $357M |
ITRM vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iterum Therapeutics… (ITRM) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITRM vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.49
- EPS growth 57.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, current ratio 1.41x
PRAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -19.0% 10Y total return vs ITRM's -100.0%
- 2.4% margin vs ITRM's -69.1%
- +8.6% vs ITRM's -96.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs ITRM's -69.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs ITRM's -96.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -53.5% ROA vs ITRM's -74.8%, ROIC -65.0% vs -117.8% |
ITRM vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ITRM vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $390,000 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $390,000 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$249M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -171.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -52.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -69.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | -19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRAX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | -25.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRAX scores 3/9 vs ITRM's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -58.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -74.8% | -53.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -117.8% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.1% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.61x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $8,157 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for ITRM. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +860.9% total return vs ITRM's -96.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 176.1% vs ITRM's -69.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.2% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.9% | +860.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +2005.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -18.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -19.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.7% | +176.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ITRM and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRM is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs ITRM's 2.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.28 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.03 | $34.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.4% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.6 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35.4M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ITRM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ITRM vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITRM or PRAX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ITRM or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -18. 4%, compared to -99. 8% for Iterum Therapeutics plc (ITRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAX returned -19. 0% versus ITRM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ITRM or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Iterum Therapeutics plc (ITRM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
49β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 4% more volatile than ITRM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ITRM or PRAX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Iterum Therapeutics plc grew EPS 57.
4% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ITRM or PRAX?
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -69. 1% for Iterum Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -52. 0% for ITRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAX leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ITRM or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ITRM or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRAX: -19. 0%, ITRM: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ITRM and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.