REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $577M | $149.25B | $41.15B | $9.62B | $16.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $335M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $3.46B | $6.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $1.43B | $260M | $838M | $2.03B |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 100.0% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 47.1% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 107.1% | 102.6% |
| Forward P/E | 3.7x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 6.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.62B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $64M | $111.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $5.03B | $741M | $505M | $2.04B |
IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invesco Mortgage Ca… (IVR) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.5x)
- 20.1% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- +42.7% vs IVR's +29.9%
- 2.3% ROA vs AGNC's 0.8%, ROIC 0.5% vs 34.0%
VTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs IVR's 0.78, lower leverage
AGNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6%
NLY is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 30.3% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.3% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs IVR's 0.78, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 20.1% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs IVR's +29.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs AGNC's 0.8%, ROIC 0.5% vs 34.0% |
IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
IVR leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • NLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 34.7x IVR's $335M. NLY is the more profitable business, keeping 30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, AGNC holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $335M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $3.5B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $158M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $3.7B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $1.4B | $260M | $838M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $604M | -$222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +100.0% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +107.1% | +102.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +24.2% | +30.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.8% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +17.5% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.6% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +2.5% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +84.6% | +79.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IVR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, IVR trades at a 97% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $577M | $149.2B | $41.1B | $9.6B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $9.2B | $125.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.25x | 153.25x | 160.26x | 11.53x | 7.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.67x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 6.87x | 7.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.12x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 2.42x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.70x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 1.97x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.86x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.67x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 111.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IVR's 7.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs NLY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +7.3% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +34.0% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +40.4% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +4.9% | +19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.05x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.01x | 6.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $16.3B | $12.5B | -$441M | $109.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $5.0B | $741M | $505M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $64M | $111.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 1.32x | 1.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,499 for IVR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs IVR's +29.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs IVR's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +2.5% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.9% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +39.4% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.8% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +58.3% | +60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -2.2% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +223.1% | +65.0% | +46.9% | +35.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +16.5% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVR's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs IVR's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.50 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $12.19 | $24.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $8.65 | $18.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.5% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +87.9% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 52.1 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 2.6M | 3.4M | 18.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IVR and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IVR as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", AGNC as "Hold", NLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.1% upside for IVR (target: $9) vs 3.8% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, IVR offers the higher dividend yield at 20.08% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $11.13 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 34 | 32 | 35 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +20.1% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +14.7% | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.61 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.58 | $2.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IVR vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC vs NLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY?
On trailing P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -45. 0% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus IVR's -31. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning IVR is approximately 8100% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGNC leads at 26. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY?
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 3% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NLY leads at 102. 6% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) trades at 3. 7x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 114. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVR: 12. 1% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the highest yield at 20. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is IVR or WELL or VTR or AGNC or NLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, IVR: -31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IVR and WELL and VTR and AGNC and NLY?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IVR is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.