REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $912M | $6.03B | $3.22B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $506M | $1.81B | $981M | $1.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-112M | $795M | $-88M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | -10.2% | 73.2% | 58.2% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 13.3% | 42.7% | 19.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 376.9x | — | 123.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.54B | $7.89B | $7.91B | $5.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $841M | $336M | $341M |
JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| SL Green Realty Cor… (SLG) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) | 100 | 41.0 | -59.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBGS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.63, yield 4.7%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.63 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage
VNO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 44.0% margin vs JBGS's -22.2%
- 6.4% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 1.4% vs -0.1%
SLG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.0%, EPS growth -21.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- -26.2% 10Y total return vs JBGS's -28.5%
- 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9%
DEI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 6.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.0% margin vs JBGS's -22.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs VNO's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 1.4% vs -0.1% |
JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VNO leads in 2 of 6 categories
DEI leads 1 • JBGS leads 0 • SLG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.6x JBGS's $506M. VNO is the more profitable business, keeping 44.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBGS's -22.2%. On growth, SLG holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $506M | $1.8B | $981M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $129M | $719M | $678M | $589M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$112M | $795M | -$88M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $93M | $1.3B | $28M | $119M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +73.2% | +58.2% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +13.3% | +42.7% | +19.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.2% | +44.0% | -9.0% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +69.4% | +2.9% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | -0.5% | +9.2% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.9% | -127.9% | -13.2% | — |
Valuation Metrics
DEI leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 94% valuation discount to DEI's 123.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DEI's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLG's 26.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $912M | $6.0B | $3.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $13.1B | $10.8B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.40x | 7.63x | -28.48x | 123.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 376.94x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.41x | 17.34x | 26.34x | 12.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.83x | 3.33x | 3.21x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.90x | 0.73x | 0.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.79x | — | 10.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-6 for JBGS. VNO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLG's 1.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs SLG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.5% | +11.8% | -2.0% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +6.4% | -0.8% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +1.8% | +1.5% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.52x | 1.16x | 1.82x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $7.0B | $7.6B | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $841M | $336M | $341M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $7.9B | $7.9B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.13x | 3.63x | — | 0.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VNO and SLG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLG five years ago would be worth $8,473 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,049 for DEI. Over the past 12 months, JBGS leads with a +5.4% total return vs VNO's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNO at 34.9% vs JBGS's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.4% | -4.2% | -2.3% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.4% | -15.7% | -13.3% | -11.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +145.3% | +144.9% | +24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | -17.6% | -15.3% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.5% | -34.5% | -26.2% | -36.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.2% | +34.9% | +34.8% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JBGS and VNO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLG's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNO currently trades 73.9% from its 52-week high vs JBGS's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.19x | 1.20x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.30 | $43.37 | $66.91 | $16.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.03 | $24.57 | $34.77 | $9.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.6% | +73.9% | +67.7% | +70.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 68.9 | 63.8 | 78.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 2.0M | 1.3M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VNO and DEI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBGS as "Hold", VNO as "Hold", SLG as "Hold", DEI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for VNO (target: $38) vs 2.2% for DEI (target: $12). For income investors, DEI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.31% vs VNO's 2.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $37.50 | $50.46 | $12.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 28 | 31 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.7% | +2.3% | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $0.74 | — | $0.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +48.6% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
VNO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DEI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
JBGS vs VNO vs SLG vs DEI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (376. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus Douglas Emmett, Inc. at 123. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI?
Over the past 5 years, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) delivered a total return of -15. 3%, compared to -49. 5% for Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLG returned -26. 2% versus DEI's -36. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus SL Green Realty Corp. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLG is approximately 90% more volatile than JBGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 116% versus 182% for SL Green Realty Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLG leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI?
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
0% net margin versus -27. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DEI leads at 19. 0% versus -1. 3% for JBGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNO: 17.
0% to $37. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI?
In this comparison, DEI (6.
3% yield), JBGS (4. 7% yield), VNO (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SLG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JBGS or VNO or SLG or DEI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBGS: -28. 5%, SLG: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBGS and VNO and SLG and DEI?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBGS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock; DEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JBGS, VNO, DEI pay a dividend while SLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.