Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Waste Management
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Waste Management | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $13M | $10M | $207M | $529M | $955M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $33M | $59M | $132M | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $551K | $3M | $-18M | $18M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 25.0% | 4.1% | 36.6% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 0.4% | -26.3% | 139015.1% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 219.3x | 13.2x | — | 31.6x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $92K | $4M | $708.60B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $6M | $12M | $123.79T | $3M |
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JE Cleantech Holdin… (JCSE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 305.0 | +205.0% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 57.8 | -42.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth -93.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 61.1%, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 0.07, yield 9.1%, current ratio 2.55x
- 6.9% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
CLWT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 20.1x)
- 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 155.1%
CWCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MSEX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 22.1% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7% |
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWCO leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLWT leads 1 • JCSE leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $199M annually — 6.0x CLWT's $33M. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, MSEX holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $33M | $59M | $132M | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $292,750 | -$14M | $25.98T | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $551,000 | $3M | -$18M | $18M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $691,000 | -$14M | $33.67T | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +25.0% | +4.1% | +36.6% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +0.4% | -26.3% | +139015.1% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +7.7% | -30.1% | +13.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +2.1% | -23.4% | +254916.5% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | -18.6% | -20.1% | +4.4% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -66.9% | -110.5% | -11.5% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, CLWT trades at a 94% valuation discount to JCSE's 219.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JCSE's 22.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $10M | $207M | $529M | $955M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $4M | $200M | -$123.08T | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 219.30x | 13.16x | -14.89x | — | 21.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 31.60x | 20.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 13.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.01x | 7.16x | — | -4.74x | 15.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.86x | 0.62x | 3.36x | 4.01x | 4.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 0.58x | 4.11x | 0.00x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.72x | 12.27x | — | 0.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSEX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLWT scores 7/9 vs MSEX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +16.2% | -34.5% | 0.0% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +12.8% | -20.2% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +2.6% | -21.7% | +26.6% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +2.3% | -16.7% | +16.0% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.00x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$6M | -$7M | -$123.08T | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $6M | $12M | $123.79T | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $92,000 | $4M | $708.6B | $419M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.04x | 74.42x | -42.14x | — | 4.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $361 for JCSE. Over the past 12 months, JCSE leads with a +84.1% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWCO at 26.3% vs MSEX's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +84.1% | +4.2% | -8.8% | -3.9% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.1% | +8.7% | +26.2% | +47.9% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.1% | -9.5% | +21.7% | +101.4% | -25.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -28.1% | +45.6% | +197.4% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +164.8% | +178.6% | +155.1% | +62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | -3.3% | +6.8% | +26.3% | -9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs JCSE's 43.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.37x | 1.85x | 0.76x | -0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $1.63 | $16.50 | $39.12 | $62.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $0.99 | $8.02 | $22.69 | $44.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.6% | +76.7% | +67.7% | +84.8% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 49.5 | 41.5 | 47.9 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 832K | 5K | 164K | 163K | 160K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWCO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 4.1% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | — | $53.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.1% | +6.4% | — | +100.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $0.08 | — | $497756.41 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLWT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs CWCO vs MSEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX?
On trailing P/E, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the cheapest at 13.
2x versus JE Cleantech Holdings Limited at 219. 3x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -96. 4% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus JCSE's -96. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately -1587% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for Middlesex Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSEX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20.
1x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), JCSE (9. 1% yield), CLWT (6. 4% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PESI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI or CWCO or MSEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCSE and CLWT and PESI and CWCO and MSEX?
These companies operate in different sectors (JCSE (Industrials) and CLWT (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and CWCO (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JCSE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JCSE, CLWT, CWCO, MSEX pay a dividend while PESI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.