Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
Integrated Freight & Logistics
JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $938K | $2.92T | $145.00B | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $742.78B | $12.37B | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $90.80B | $1.33B | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 7.1% | 50.6% | 48.0% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | -41.0% | 11.5% | 13.3% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x | 60.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $288K | $152.99B | $188M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $86.81B | $1.53B | $5.89B |
JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffs' Brands Ltd (JFBR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 164.3 | +64.3% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 374.8 | +274.8% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 50.6 | -49.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JFBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.36
- Rev growth 36.8%, EPS growth 63.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 4.40x
- Beta 0.36, current ratio 4.40x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 12.2% margin vs JFBR's -49.7%
- +43.7% vs JFBR's -98.9%
- 11.5% ROA vs JFBR's -57.9%, ROIC 14.7% vs -78.2%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
UPS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.42 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 2.08
- 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.8% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs JFBR's -49.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs JFBR's -98.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs JFBR's -57.9%, ROIC 14.7% vs -78.2% |
JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
UPS leads 1 • JFBR leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMZN and SHOP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 27706.2x JFBR's $27M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JFBR's -49.7%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $742.8B | $12.4B | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $155.9B | $1.7B | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $90.8B | $1.3B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$2.5B | $2.1B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +50.6% | +48.0% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.0% | +11.5% | +13.3% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -49.7% | +12.2% | +10.8% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | -0.3% | +17.2% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +16.6% | +34.3% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.4% | +74.8% | +15.1% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 87% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $938,200 | $2.92T | $145.0B | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $2.98T | $143.7B | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.62x | 37.82x | 118.87x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x | 60.91x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 4.06x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x | 95.83x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 4.07x | 12.55x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 7.14x | 10.82x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x | 72.25x | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-163 for JFBR. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JFBR scores 6/9 vs UPS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -163.2% | +23.3% | +10.5% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.9% | +11.5% | +9.0% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -78.2% | +14.7% | +9.4% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.6% | +15.3% | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.37x | 0.01x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $66.2B | -$1.3B | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $86.8B | $1.5B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $288,000 | $153.0B | $188M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.58x | 39.96x | — | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for JFBR. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs JFBR's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs JFBR's -94.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.6% | +19.7% | -28.9% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.9% | +43.7% | +18.2% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +156.2% | +73.6% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +64.8% | +0.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +697.8% | +4123.0% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.9% | +36.8% | +20.2% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JFBR and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JFBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs JFBR's 0.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.51x | 2.64x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $240.38 | $278.56 | $182.19 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $185.01 | $88.14 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.9% | +97.3% | +61.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 81.1 | 34.7 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 45.5M | 8.7M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMZN as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). UPS is the only dividend payer here at 6.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 | $164.75 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 | 63 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). UPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JFBR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jeffs' Brands Ltd (JFBR) is the stronger pick with 36.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Jeffs' Brands Ltd (JFBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus JFBR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jeffs' Brands Ltd (JFBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 627% more volatile than JFBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jeffs' Brands Ltd (JFBR) is pulling ahead at 36.
8% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jeffs' Brands Ltd grew EPS 63. 9% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JFBR leads at 28. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -57. 0% for Jeffs' Brands Ltd — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHOP leads at 12. 7% versus -45. 3% for JFBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 46. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield) pays a dividend. JFBR, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JFBR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JFBR and AMZN and SHOP and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (JFBR (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JFBR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UPS pays a dividend while JFBR, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.