Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Confectioners
Packaged Foods
Food Confectioners
Food Confectioners
JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Food Confectioners | Packaged Foods | Food Confectioners | Food Confectioners |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $20M | $1.24B | $37.89B | $78.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $30M | $1.45B | $11.99B | $39.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $-4M | $91M | $1.09B | $2.61B |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 21.0% | 34.0% | 34.8% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | -10.9% | 14.4% | 14.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | — | 7.5x | 22.2x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $164M | $7M | $304M | $5.40B | $22.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $720K | $98M | $926M | $2.13B |
JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| J&J Snack Foods Cor… (JJSF) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
| Rocky Mountain Choc… (RMCF) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
| The Hershey Company (HSY) | 100 | 137.8 | +37.8% |
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JJSF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.1%, current ratio 2.72x
- 4.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs HSY's 2.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
RMCF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +103.2% vs SMPL's -64.8%
SMPL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs JJSF's 0.62
- 9.0% revenue growth vs JJSF's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 20.1x)
HSY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 142.6% 10Y total return vs MDLZ's 68.4%
- 9.1% margin vs RMCF's -13.6%
- 8.0% ROA vs RMCF's -19.5%, ROIC 11.5% vs -35.7%
MDLZ is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.06 vs RMCF's 1.10, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs JJSF's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs RMCF's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs RMCF's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs HSY's 2.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs RMCF's -19.5%, ROIC 11.5% vs -35.7% |
JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HSY leads in 2 of 6 categories
SMPL leads 1 • JJSF leads 0 • RMCF leads 0 • MDLZ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDLZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 1326.1x RMCF's $30M. HSY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RMCF's -13.6%. On growth, HSY holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $30M | $1.4B | $12.0B | $39.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $160M | -$2M | $231M | $2.0B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | -$4M | $91M | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | -$2M | $174M | $2.2B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +21.0% | +34.0% | +34.8% | +28.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -10.9% | +14.4% | +14.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -13.6% | +6.3% | +9.1% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -7.0% | +12.0% | +18.1% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -4.4% | -0.3% | +10.6% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.6% | +81.8% | -31.6% | +93.6% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 72% valuation discount to HSY's 43.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.51x vs JJSF's 0.79x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $20M | $1.2B | $37.9B | $78.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $26M | $1.4B | $42.4B | $99.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.53x | -2.95x | 12.20x | 43.07x | 32.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.53x | — | 7.45x | 22.23x | 20.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.79x | — | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.50x | — | 5.97x | 29.24x | 19.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 0.67x | 0.86x | 3.24x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 2.58x | 0.70x | 8.19x | 3.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.50x | — | 7.86x | 21.66x | 24.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSY delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-67 for RMCF. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSY's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSY scores 6/9 vs RMCF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | -67.2% | +5.2% | +23.7% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -19.5% | +3.7% | +8.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | -35.7% | +8.1% | +11.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | -44.3% | +9.4% | +14.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.03x | 0.17x | 1.17x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $6M | $206M | $4.5B | $20.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $720,000 | $98M | $926M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $164M | $7M | $304M | $5.4B | $22.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 50.00x | -3.92x | 6.77x | 7.99x | 10.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RMCF and HSY and MDLZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSY five years ago would be worth $12,480 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,565 for SMPL. Over the past 12 months, RMCF leads with a +103.2% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDLZ at -5.1% vs SMPL's -31.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | +31.6% | -36.4% | +3.3% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.6% | +103.2% | -64.8% | +14.1% | -5.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.1% | -53.0% | -67.8% | -26.2% | -14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | -57.7% | -64.3% | +24.8% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | -56.4% | +3.7% | +142.6% | +68.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | -22.2% | -31.5% | -9.6% | -5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSY and MDLZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSY is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RMCF's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDLZ currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 1.10x | 0.38x | -0.03x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $129.24 | $2.99 | $36.92 | $239.48 | $71.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.75 | $1.14 | $10.21 | $150.04 | $51.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +84.9% | +33.7% | +78.1% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 65.6 | 42.9 | 37.3 | 68.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 32K | 2.8M | 1.7M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JJSF and HSY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JJSF as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy", HSY as "Hold", MDLZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 9.3% for MDLZ (target: $67). For income investors, JJSF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs HSY's 2.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $20.17 | $226.29 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — | 24 | 35 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | — | +2.9% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 0 | — | 34 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.11 | — | — | $5.34 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
HSY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SMPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
JJSF vs RMCF vs SMPL vs HSY vs MDLZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus The Hershey Company at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 31x versus J&J Snack Foods Corp. 's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ?
Over the past 5 years, The Hershey Company (HSY) delivered a total return of +24.
8%, compared to -64. 3% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSY returned +142. 6% versus RMCF's -56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Hershey Company (HSY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning RMCF is approximately -4466% more volatile than HSY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 117% for The Hershey Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J&J Snack Foods Corp. grew EPS -24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -60. 3% for The Hershey Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ?
The Hershey Company (HSY) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
6% net margin versus -20. 7% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -20. 1% for RMCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus J&J Snack Foods Corp. 's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for The Hershey Company — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ?
In this comparison, JJSF (4.
1% yield), MDLZ (3. 1% yield), HSY (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RMCF, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JJSF or RMCF or SMPL or HSY or MDLZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Hershey Company (HSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03), 2. 9% yield, +142. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSY: +142. 6%, RMCF: -56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JJSF and RMCF and SMPL and HSY and MDLZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JJSF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RMCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; HSY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. JJSF, HSY, MDLZ pay a dividend while RMCF, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.