Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $539M | $30.91B | $2.92T | $53.62B | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $28.65B | $742.78B | $21.04B | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-62M | $-165M | $90.80B | $1.43B | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 12.7% | 50.6% | 44.9% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | -33.9% | 0.3% | 11.5% | 8.2% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 292.4x | 34.8x | 25.1x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $4.63B | $152.99B | $4.12B | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $6.32B | $86.81B | $2.41B | $1.87B |
JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jumia Technologies … (JMIA) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 173.8 | +73.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JMIA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +262.5% vs SE's -37.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CPNG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- 11.5% ROA vs JMIA's -40.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs -33.0%
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 1.49x
- 28.8% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 34.8x)
- 17.6% margin vs JMIA's -32.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs JMIA's -32.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs JMIA's 2.89 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +262.5% vs SE's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs JMIA's -40.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs -33.0% |
JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SE leads in 1 of 6 categories
EBAY leads 1 • JMIA leads 1 • CPNG leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SE and EBAY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 3932.4x JMIA's $189M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JMIA's -32.6%. On growth, SE holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $28.7B | $742.8B | $21.0B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$56M | -$45M | $155.9B | $2.0B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$62M | -$165M | $90.8B | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | $279M | -$2.5B | $3.9B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +12.7% | +50.6% | +44.9% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.9% | +0.3% | +11.5% | +8.2% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | -0.6% | +12.2% | +6.8% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | +1.0% | -0.3% | +18.5% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.3% | -74.4% | +16.6% | +38.3% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.9% | -3.5% | +74.8% | +126.9% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 84% valuation discount to CPNG's 156.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SE's 52.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $539M | $30.9B | $2.92T | $53.6B | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $474M | $29.2B | $2.98T | $55.3B | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.53x | 156.55x | 37.82x | 121.47x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 292.36x | 34.77x | 25.06x | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.79x | 20.47x | 52.61x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.85x | 0.90x | 4.07x | 3.19x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.70x | 6.91x | 7.14x | 6.32x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 59.22x | 378.98x | 18.14x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-135 for JMIA. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs JMIA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.2% | -3.7% | +23.3% | +15.2% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.1% | -0.9% | +11.5% | +5.8% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.0% | +14.5% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -97.8% | +5.9% | +15.3% | +6.0% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.00x | 0.37x | 0.49x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$65M | -$1.7B | $66.2B | $1.7B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $6.3B | $86.8B | $2.4B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $4.6B | $153.0B | $4.1B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.73x | 8.88x | 39.96x | 49.70x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JMIA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,262 for JMIA. Over the past 12 months, JMIA leads with a +262.5% total return vs SE's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JMIA at 44.1% vs CPNG's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.2% | -26.3% | +19.7% | -32.6% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +262.5% | -35.3% | +43.7% | -37.8% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.0% | -3.1% | +156.2% | +5.1% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.4% | -55.8% | +64.8% | -63.1% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | -65.0% | +697.8% | +455.5% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.1% | -1.1% | +36.8% | +1.7% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JMIA's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SE's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 1.27x | 1.51x | 1.45x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.72 | $34.08 | $278.56 | $199.30 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.13 | $16.74 | $185.01 | $77.05 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +50.5% | +97.3% | +44.5% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 33.7 | 81.1 | 57.1 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 21.5M | 45.5M | 4.8M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JMIA as "Buy", CPNG as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", SE as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.2% upside for JMIA (target: $17) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.33 | $26.60 | $306.77 | $147.67 | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 | 94 | 44 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
SE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EBAY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
JMIA vs CPNG vs AMZN vs SE vs EBAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sea Limited (SE) is the stronger pick with 28.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Coupang, Inc. at 156. 5x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -67. 4% for Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus JMIA's -65. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Jumia Technologies AG's 2. 89β — meaning JMIA is approximately 293% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sea Limited (SE) is pulling ahead at 28.
8% versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -32. 6% for Jumia Technologies AG — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -33. 9% for JMIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 292. 4x for Coupang, Inc. — 275. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JMIA: 99. 2% to $17. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. JMIA, CPNG, AMZN, SE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JMIA or CPNG or AMZN or SE or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, JMIA: -65. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JMIA and CPNG and AMZN and SE and EBAY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JMIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY pays a dividend while JMIA, CPNG, AMZN, SE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.