Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $11M | $2.60B | $24.00B | $20.84B | $20.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $3.73B | $8.30B | $11.19B | $16.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $105M | $348M | $837M | $599M |
| Gross Margin | 1.3% | 48.7% | 12.2% | 20.2% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 3.8% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.8x | 41.9x | 23.6x | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $509M | $4.70B | $571M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $98M | $310M | $1.31B | $161M |
JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jayud Global Logist… (JYD) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) | 100 | 113.7 | +13.7% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 462.8 | +362.8% |
| Expeditors Internat… (EXPD) | 100 | 137.6 | +37.6% |
| C.H. Robinson World… (CHRW) | 100 | 169.9 | +69.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JYD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, HUBG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
XPO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 21.2% 10Y total return vs EXPD's 248.1%
- PEG 1.52 vs HUBG's 21.98
- PEG 1.52 vs 5.19
EXPD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 4.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 24.2%, current ratio 1.81x
- 4.4% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4%
- 7.5% margin vs JYD's -5.3%
CHRW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 1.4%
- Beta 0.97, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.53x
- 1.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EXPD's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +94.1% vs JYD's -55.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4% | |
| Value | PEG 1.52 vs 5.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs JYD's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs JYD's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EXPD's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.1% vs JYD's -55.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.4% ROA vs JYD's -30.6%, ROIC 48.4% vs -33.1% |
JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXPD leads in 3 of 6 categories
JYD leads 1 • XPO leads 1 • HUBG leads 0 • CHRW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 16.0x JYD's $1.0B. EXPD is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JYD's -5.3%. On growth, JYD holds the edge at +113.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $3.7B | $8.3B | $11.2B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | $331M | $1.3B | $1.1B | $896M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $105M | $348M | $837M | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $113M | $457M | $921M | $858M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +48.7% | +12.2% | +20.2% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +3.8% | +9.1% | +9.7% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +2.8% | +4.2% | +7.5% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +3.0% | +5.5% | +8.2% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.3% | -5.3% | +7.3% | +4.4% | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +20.5% | +49.1% | +16.3% | +9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
JYD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.2x trailing earnings, HUBG trades at a 67% valuation discount to XPO's 77.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XPO offers better value at 2.80x vs HUBG's 20.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $2.6B | $24.0B | $20.8B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $3.0B | $28.4B | $20.1B | $21.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.12x | 25.22x | 77.44x | 26.33x | 35.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.81x | 41.86x | 23.61x | 27.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 20.68x | 2.80x | 3.34x | 6.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.04x | 22.72x | 18.11x | 24.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.66x | 2.94x | 1.88x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 1.55x | 13.07x | 9.05x | 11.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.09x | 72.96x | 21.86x | 22.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPD delivers a 36.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-102 for JYD. EXPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XPO's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXPD scores 8/9 vs JYD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.8% | +6.1% | +19.0% | +36.7% | +33.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.6% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +17.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.1% | +5.1% | +9.3% | +48.4% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.5% | +6.1% | +11.3% | +38.2% | +25.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.30x | 2.53x | 0.24x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $410M | $4.4B | -$744M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $98M | $310M | $1.3B | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $509M | $4.7B | $571M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.25x | 11.77x | 3.21x | — | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $39,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $232 for JYD. Over the past 12 months, CHRW leads with a +94.1% total return vs JYD's -55.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 61.6% vs JYD's -68.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.9% | +0.6% | +47.3% | +3.2% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.3% | +30.9% | +82.4% | +43.5% | +94.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +19.9% | +322.1% | +38.2% | +73.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +19.9% | +298.9% | +36.3% | +80.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +121.7% | +2119.8% | +248.1% | +163.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.5% | +6.2% | +61.6% | +11.4% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EXPD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JYD's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXPD currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs JYD's 18.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.20x | 1.72x | 0.75x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $53.26 | $231.46 | $167.19 | $203.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.38 | $31.52 | $109.64 | $108.36 | $87.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.3% | +80.5% | +88.3% | +93.7% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 57.5 | 46.6 | 56.9 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 707K | 1.3M | 1.1M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EXPD and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUBG as "Hold", XPO as "Buy", EXPD as "Hold", CHRW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.3% upside for CHRW (target: $187) vs -8.5% for EXPD (target: $143). For income investors, CHRW offers the higher dividend yield at 1.45% vs EXPD's 0.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.33 | $211.60 | $143.44 | $187.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 32 | 33 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | — | +1.0% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.49 | — | $1.52 | $2.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.5% | +3.2% | +1.7% |
EXPD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JYD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
JYD vs HUBG vs XPO vs EXPD vs CHRW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW?
On trailing P/E, Hub Group, Inc.
(HUBG) is the cheapest at 25. 2x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 77. 4x. On forward P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 98x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +298. 9%, compared to -97. 7% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 2% versus JYD's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Jayud Global Logistics Limited's 1. 84β — meaning JYD is approximately 146% more volatile than EXPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 25. 1% year-over-year, compared to -553. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPO leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW?
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -5. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPD leads at 9. 5% versus -5. 8% for JYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBG leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 98x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) trades at 23. 6x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHRW: 9. 3% to $187. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW?
In this comparison, CHRW (1.
4% yield), HUBG (1. 2% yield), EXPD (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. JYD, XPO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JYD or HUBG or XPO or EXPD or CHRW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +248. 1% 10Y return). Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +248. 1%, JYD: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JYD and HUBG and XPO and EXPD and CHRW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HUBG, EXPD, CHRW pay a dividend while JYD, XPO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.