Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $293M | $234M | $861M | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147M | $199M | $847M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $41M | $196M | $-535K |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 57.7% | 47.2% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 25.6% | 31.7% | -21.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x | 6.1x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $78M | $4M | $100M | $810K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $12M | $559M | $6M |
KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kingsway Financial … (KFS) | 100 | 459.6 | +359.6% |
| Kingstone Companies… (KINS) | 100 | 367.3 | +267.3% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 122.8% 10Y total return vs HRTG's 119.4%
KINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 94.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 1.22x
- PEG 0.06 vs HRTG's 0.39
HRTG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 23.1% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
- +15.3% vs HIHO's -51.2%
HIHO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 14.1% yield, vs KFS's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.1% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs KFS's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.1% yield, vs KFS's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs HIHO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 46.6% vs -31.7% |
KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 2 of 6 categories
HIHO leads 1 • KINS leads 1 • KFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRTG is the larger business by revenue, generating $847M annually — 137.9x HIHO's $6M. HRTG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, KFS holds the edge at +35.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147M | $199M | $847M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $54M | $281M | -$653,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $41M | $196M | -$535,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$346,000 | $73M | $177M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.2% | +57.7% | +47.2% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +25.6% | +31.7% | -21.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +20.5% | +23.1% | -8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +36.7% | +20.8% | -6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.9% | -3.2% | +2.4% | -44.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +157.5% | +2.3% | -2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 87% valuation discount to HIHO's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs KINS's 0.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $234M | $861M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $355M | $226M | $402M | -$2M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.83x | 5.61x | 4.44x | 32.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.03x | 6.07x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.06x | 0.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 114.59x | 4.22x | 1.48x | -22.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.15x | 1.17x | 1.02x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.30x | 1.86x | 1.72x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.20x | 4.94x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-34 for KFS. KINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFS's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KINS scores 7/9 vs KFS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.4% | +40.0% | +47.3% | -9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | +9.8% | +8.4% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.4% | +46.6% | +15.4% | -31.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +20.3% | +11.1% | -7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 0.04x | 0.20x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $62M | -$8M | -$459M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $12M | $559M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78M | $4M | $100M | $810,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.83x | 115.65x | 33.88x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,296 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, HRTG leads with a +15.3% total return vs HIHO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 127.2% vs HIHO's -18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | -0.3% | +2.7% | -42.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.9% | -10.1% | +15.3% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.2% | +1073.4% | +585.3% | -45.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.8% | +99.4% | +201.4% | -57.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.8% | +101.9% | +119.4% | -41.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.1% | +127.2% | +89.9% | -18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KINS and HRTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KINS is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KFS's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HRTG currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 36.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.28x | 0.50x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.80 | $22.40 | $31.98 | $2.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.82 | $13.08 | $16.83 | $0.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.0% | +72.1% | +87.6% | +36.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.6 | 50.5 | 55.7 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 113K | 282K | 60K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFS and HRTG and HIHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KINS as "Buy", HRTG as "Buy". For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.06% vs KFS's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $39.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.6% | — | +14.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.10 | — | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
HRTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HIHO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KFS vs KINS vs HRTG vs HIHO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -57. 0% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFS returned +122. 8% versus HIHO's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Kingsway Financial Services Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning KFS is approximately 276% more volatile than KINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 5% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KINS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO?
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus -7. 8% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRTG leads at 30. 6% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 7. 0x for Kingstone Companies, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO?
In this comparison, HIHO (14.
1% yield), KINS (0. 6% yield), KFS (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HRTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KFS or KINS or HRTG or HIHO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 0. 6% yield, +101. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KINS: +101. 9%, KFS: +122. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KFS and KINS and HRTG and HIHO?
These companies operate in different sectors (KFS (Consumer Cyclical) and KINS (Financial Services) and HRTG (Financial Services) and HIHO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; KINS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock. KINS, HIHO pay a dividend while KFS, HRTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.