Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.00
5Y Perf.-64.9%
COE
51Talk Online Education Group

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • CN
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.+29.0%
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CN
Market Cap$760M
5Y Perf.-36.7%
DUOL
Duolingo, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.03B
5Y Perf.-72.3%
CHGG
Chegg, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$130M
5Y Perf.+59.5%

KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KIDZW logoKIDZW
COE logoCOE
GOTU logoGOTU
DUOL logoDUOL
CHGG logoCHGG
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesSoftware - ApplicationEducation & Training ServicesSoftware - ApplicationEducation & Training Services
Market Cap$2.00$2M$760M$5.03B$130M
Revenue (TTM)$4M$81M$5.85B$1.10B$319M
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-11M$-374M$422M$-86M
Gross Margin55.3%75.3%67.5%72.7%61.9%
Operating Margin-79.0%-11.2%-9.1%14.2%-11.1%
Forward P/E417.0x38.2x
Total Debt$0.00$3M$492M$94M$84M
Cash & Equiv.$28M$1.32B$1.04B$31M

KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KIDZW
COE
GOTU
DUOL
CHGG
StockApr 25May 26Return
Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW)10035.1-64.9%
51Talk Online Educa… (COE)100129.0+29.0%
Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU)10063.3-36.7%
Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL)10027.7-72.3%
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG)100159.5+59.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DUOL leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. 51Talk Online Education Group is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CHGG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
The Consumer Defensive Pick

KIDZW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
COE
51Talk Online Education Group
The Income Pick

COE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 0.91
  • Rev growth 87.0%, EPS growth 50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 300.7%
  • 87.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0%
  • Beta 0.91 vs CHGG's 2.83
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GOTU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
DUOL
Duolingo, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

DUOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • -22.3% 10Y total return vs COE's -68.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
  • Beta 0.95, current ratio 2.61x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CHGG
Chegg, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CHGG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +60.3% vs KIDZW's -91.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOE logoCOE87.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0%
ValueDUOL logoDUOLBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsDUOL logoDUOL38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2%
Stability / SafetyCOE logoCOEBeta 0.91 vs CHGG's 2.83
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CHGG logoCHGG+60.3% vs KIDZW's -91.8%
Efficiency (ROA)DUOL logoDUOL22.6% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 40.8% vs -13.4%

KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KIDZWClassover Holdings, Inc. Warrants

Segment breakdown not available.

COE51Talk Online Education Group
FY 2021
Prepaid credit packages
50.0%$2.2B
Credits for lessons taught by foreign teachers
46.1%$2.0B
Credits for learning materials
2.3%$102M
Credits for All-round Proficiency small group lessons
0.8%$34M
Physical textbook
0.5%$21M
Point Exchange
0.2%$10M
Prepaid membership packages
0.1%$2M
GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
FY 2024
Learning Services
98.9%$4.4B
Other Revenue
1.1%$50M
DUOLDuolingo, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
87.6%$873M
Advertising
8.0%$80M
English Test
4.2%$42M
Product And Service, Other Miscellaneous
0.2%$2M
CHGGChegg, Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription Services
100.0%$549M

KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDUOLLAGGINGCHGG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DUOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 1580.2x KIDZW's $4M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWClassover Holding…COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$81M$5.8B$1.1B$319M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M-$9M-$378M$167M$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$11M-$374M$422M-$86M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$0$0$423M-$25M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.3%+75.3%+67.5%+72.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-79.0%-11.2%-9.1%+14.2%-11.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-53.2%-13.4%-6.4%+38.4%-26.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-94.8%+10.9%+1.7%+38.5%-8.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.5%+32.9%+26.5%-47.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+29.2%+101.2%
DUOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — COE and CHGG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 27.3x.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWClassover Holding…COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2$2M$760M$5.0B$130M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2-$23M$638M$4.1B$183M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.01x-0.33x-4.86x12.60x-1.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.416.96x38.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.27x11.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.04x1.12x4.85x0.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.67x3.87x1.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.41x64.78x13.61x
Evenly matched — COE and CHGG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DUOL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWClassover Holding…COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-36.5%-21.8%+33.6%-62.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.7%-21.0%-6.8%+22.6%-26.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-47.8%+40.8%-13.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-39.9%+7.9%-26.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–905446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.07x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$0-$25M-$829M-$943M$53M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$28M$1.3B$1.0B$31M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$3M$492M$94M$84M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.46x-525.53x
DUOL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — COE and DUOL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DUOL five years ago would be worth $7,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $141 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +60.3% total return vs KIDZW's -91.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 57.0% vs CHGG's -51.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWClassover Holding…COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+45.8%-24.5%-19.3%-38.8%+18.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.8%+19.8%-40.3%-78.6%+60.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+286.9%-32.3%-18.1%-88.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.2%-92.1%-22.3%-98.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.9%-81.2%-22.3%-73.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+57.0%-12.2%-6.4%-51.4%
Evenly matched — COE and DUOL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — COE and CHGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

COE is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHGG currently trades 61.1% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 4.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWClassover Holding…COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.69x0.91x1.01x0.95x2.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.38$56.13$4.56$544.93$1.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.01$15.32$1.84$87.89$0.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.6%+42.0%+43.2%+19.8%+61.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.150.052.761.668.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded100K9K391K2.4M1.4M
Evenly matched — COE and CHGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: COE as "Buy", GOTU as "Hold", DUOL as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2522.4% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 33.2% for DUOL (target: $144).

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWClassover Holding…COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.94$143.86$30.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts2102222
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallDuolingo, Inc. (DUOL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KIDZW vs COE vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 87.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (38. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG?

On forward P/E, Duolingo, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 38. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG?

Over the past 5 years, Duolingo, Inc.

(DUOL) delivered a total return of -22. 3%, compared to -98. 6% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DUOL returned -22. 3% versus GOTU's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

91β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 83β — meaning CHGG is approximately 212% more volatile than COE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 87.

0% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 300. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG?

Duolingo, Inc.

(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUOL leads at 13. 1% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 78. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Duolingo, Inc.

(DUOL) trades at 38. 2x forward P/E versus 417. 0x for 51Talk Online Education Group — 378. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2522. 4% to $30. 42.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KIDZW or COE or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

91)). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COE: -68. 9%, CHGG: -73. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KIDZW and COE and GOTU and DUOL and CHGG?

These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and DUOL (Technology) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KIDZW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $500M
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOTU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DUOL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHGG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KIDZW and COE and GOTU and DUOL and CHGG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KIDZW: 31.5% · COE: 87.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.