Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Software - Application
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $760M | $2M | $7.53B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $5.85B | $81M | $0.00 | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-374M | $-11M | $-450M | $422M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 67.5% | 75.3% | — | 72.7% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | -9.1% | -11.2% | — | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 446.1x | — | 38.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $492M | $3M | $0.00 | $94M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $1.32B | $28M | $262M | $1.04B |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| 51Talk Online Educa… (COE) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, KIDZW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 25.5%, current ratio 1.12x
- Beta 0.99 vs KIDZW's 2.64
COE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 87.0%, EPS growth 50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 300.7%
- 87.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0%
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs DUOL's -18.3%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
- +53.5% vs KIDZW's -92.6%
DUOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2%
- 22.6% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC 40.8% vs -32.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs KIDZW's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs KIDZW's -92.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC 40.8% vs -32.5% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories
COE leads 1 • NUVL leads 1 • KIDZW leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $5.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $5.8B | $81M | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$378M | -$9M | -$346M | $167M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$374M | -$11M | -$450M | $422M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 | $0 | -$313M | $423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +67.5% | +75.3% | — | +72.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | -9.1% | -11.2% | — | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | -6.4% | -13.4% | — | +38.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +1.7% | +10.9% | — | +38.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | +32.9% | — | — | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +66.7% | — | -17.8% | +29.2% |
Valuation Metrics
COE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $760M | $2M | $7.5B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $638M | -$23M | $7.3B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -4.86x | -0.35x | -17.50x | 13.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 446.11x | — | 38.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 29.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.12x | 0.05x | — | 5.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.67x | — | 5.96x | 4.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.81x | 0.44x | — | 14.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-43 for NUVL. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOTU's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COE scores 5/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | -21.8% | — | -42.8% | +33.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -6.8% | -21.0% | -37.8% | +22.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -47.8% | — | -32.5% | +40.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -39.9% | — | -34.4% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | — | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$829M | -$25M | -$262M | -$943M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $1.3B | $28M | $262M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $492M | $3M | $0 | $94M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | — | — | -26.85x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $762 for GOTU. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +53.5% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 60.6% vs GOTU's -12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -19.3% | -19.2% | +1.5% | -35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | -39.4% | +31.5% | +53.5% | -77.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -32.3% | +313.9% | +171.2% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -92.4% | -67.1% | +446.1% | -18.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -81.2% | -66.7% | +446.1% | -18.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -12.2% | +60.6% | +39.5% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOTU and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 0.99x | 1.01x | 1.09x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $4.56 | $56.13 | $113.02 | $544.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.84 | $15.32 | $63.56 | $87.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +43.2% | +45.0% | +90.6% | +20.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 52.7 | 53.3 | 52.9 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 395K | 9K | 544K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", COE as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy", DUOL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 94.1% upside for DUOL (target: $221) vs 41.0% for NUVL (target: $144).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | — | $144.40 | $220.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 14 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs NUVL vs DUOL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 87.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (38. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL?
On forward P/E, Duolingo, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 38. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -92. 4% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus GOTU's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants's 2. 64β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 167% more volatile than GOTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 25% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 87.
0% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 300. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUOL leads at 13. 1% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 78. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) trades at 38. 4x forward P/E versus 446. 1x for 51Talk Online Education Group — 407. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DUOL: 94. 1% to $220. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or NUVL or DUOL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +446. 1% 10Y return). Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and COE and NUVL and DUOL?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology) and NUVL (Healthcare) and DUOL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.