Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KMPR vs KINS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
KMPR vs KINS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $1.73B | $234M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.71B | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 8.1% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.00B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $12M |
KMPR vs KINS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Kingstone Companies… (KINS) | 100 | 367.3 | +267.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KMPR vs KINS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 4.3%
- Better valuation composite
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KINS's 0.6%
KINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 94.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- 101.9% 10Y total return vs KMPR's 31.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 1.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs KMPR's 0.58, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KINS's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.1% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 46.6% vs 3.1% |
KMPR vs KINS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KMPR vs KINS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMPR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 23.6x KINS's $199M. KINS is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, KINS holds the edge at -3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $382M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -104.9% | +157.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KMPR and KINS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, KINS trades at a 56% valuation discount to KMPR's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KINS's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMPR's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $234M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $226M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.83x | 5.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.82x | 7.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.08x | 4.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.11x | 3.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS delivers a 40.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. KINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +40.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +9.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +46.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +20.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $879M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.59x | 115.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KINS five years ago would be worth $19,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, KINS leads with a -10.1% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 127.2% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.9% | -0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.2% | -10.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | +1073.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | +99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.6% | +101.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | +127.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KINS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KINS is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KINS currently trades 72.1% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.13 | $22.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.74 | $13.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +72.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 813K | 113K |
Analyst Outlook
KMPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KMPR as "Buy" and KINS as "Buy". For income investors, KMPR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs KINS's 0.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $0.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.5% | 0.0% |
KINS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMPR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
KMPR vs KINS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KMPR or KINS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KMPR or KINS?
On trailing P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Kemper Corporation at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KMPR or KINS?
Over the past 5 years, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KINS returned +101. 9% versus KMPR's +31. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KMPR or KINS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately 112% more volatile than KINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KMPR or KINS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kingstone Companies, Inc. grew EPS 94. 6% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KINS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KMPR or KINS?
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KINS leads at 25. 6% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KINS leads at 57. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KMPR or KINS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for Kemper Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — KMPR or KINS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kemper Corporation (KMPR) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS).
09Is KMPR or KINS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 0. 6% yield, +101. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KINS: +101. 9%, KMPR: +31. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KMPR and KINS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; KINS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.