Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KMPR vs KINS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KMPR
Kemper Corporation

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.73B
5Y Perf.-53.7%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$234M
5Y Perf.+267.3%

KMPR vs KINS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KMPR logoKMPR
KINS logoKINS
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$1.73B$234M
Revenue (TTM)$4.71B$199M
Net Income (TTM)$39M$41M
Gross Margin8.1%57.7%
Operating Margin0.7%25.6%
Forward P/E7.8x7.0x
Total Debt$1.00B$4M
Cash & Equiv.$126M$12M

KMPR vs KINSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KMPR
KINS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kemper Corporation (KMPR)10046.3-53.7%
Kingstone Companies… (KINS)100367.3+267.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KMPR vs KINS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KINS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Kemper Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KMPR
Kemper Corporation
The Insurance Pick

KMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 4.3%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KINS's 0.6%
Best for: income & stability
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

KINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 94.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
  • 101.9% 10Y total return vs KMPR's 31.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 1.22x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKINS logoKINS28.4% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6%
ValueKMPR logoKMPRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKINS logoKINSCombined ratio 0.7 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyKINS logoKINSBeta 0.28 vs KMPR's 0.58, lower leverage
DividendsKMPR logoKMPR4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KINS's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)KINS logoKINS-10.1% vs KMPR's -50.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KINS logoKINS9.8% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 46.6% vs 3.1%

KMPR vs KINS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KMPRKemper Corporation
FY 2023
Specialty Property & Casualty Insurance
80.2%$3.6B
Preferred Property & Casualty Insurance
11.2%$509M
Life and Health Insurance
8.6%$388M
Other Segments
0.0%$0
KINSKingstone Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$203M

KMPR vs KINS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKINSLAGGINGKMPR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

KMPR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 23.6x KINS's $199M. KINS is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, KINS holds the edge at -3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKMPR logoKMPRKemper CorporationKINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.7B$199M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$21M$54M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$39M$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$382M$73M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+8.1%+57.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.7%+25.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.8%+20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.1%+36.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.0%-3.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-104.9%+157.5%
KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KMPR and KINS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.6x trailing earnings, KINS trades at a 56% valuation discount to KMPR's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KINS's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMPR's 11.1x.

MetricKMPR logoKMPRKemper CorporationKINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$234M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$226M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.83x5.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.82x7.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.08x4.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.36x1.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.69x1.86x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.11x3.20x
Evenly matched — KMPR and KINS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KINS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

KINS delivers a 40.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. KINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x.

MetricKMPR logoKMPRKemper CorporationKINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%+40.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+9.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.1%+46.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%+20.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.38x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$879M-$8M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$126M$12M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$4M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.59x115.65x
KINS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KINS five years ago would be worth $19,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, KINS leads with a -10.1% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 127.2% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKMPR logoKMPRKemper CorporationKINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.9%-0.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-50.2%-10.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-29.0%+1073.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.2%+99.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+31.6%+101.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.8%+127.2%
KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KINS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KINS is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KINS currently trades 72.1% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKMPR logoKMPRKemper CorporationKINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.58x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.13$22.40
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.74$13.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.4%+72.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.150.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded813K113K
KINS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KMPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates KMPR as "Buy" and KINS as "Buy". For income investors, KMPR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs KINS's 0.62%.

MetricKMPR logoKMPRKemper CorporationKINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts124
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.3%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.27$0.10
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+17.5%0.0%
KMPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KINS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMPR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallKingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KMPR vs KINS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KMPR or KINS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KMPR or KINS?

On trailing P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Kemper Corporation at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KMPR or KINS?

Over the past 5 years, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KINS returned +101. 9% versus KMPR's +31. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KMPR or KINS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately 112% more volatile than KINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KMPR or KINS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kingstone Companies, Inc. grew EPS 94. 6% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KINS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KMPR or KINS?

Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KINS leads at 25. 6% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KINS leads at 57. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KMPR or KINS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for Kemper Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KMPR or KINS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Kemper Corporation (KMPR) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS).

09

Is KMPR or KINS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 0. 6% yield, +101. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KINS: +101. 9%, KMPR: +31. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KMPR and KINS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; KINS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

KMPR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KINS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KMPR and KINS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KMPR: -7.0% · KINS: -3.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KMPR: 12.8x · KINS: 5.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.