Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
Consumer Electronics
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | Consumer Electronics | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $755M | $756M | $3.86B | $232M | $189M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $252M | $662M | $5M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-32M | $48M | $-32.28B | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 91.1% | 20.2% | -0.0% | -14.4% |
| Operating Margin | -26.6% | 11.5% | 17.5% | -5.2% | -57.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 99.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $1.56B | $2.28B | $1.00B | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $14M | $48M | $21.15B | $32M |
KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kopin Corporation (KOPN) | 100 | 463.5 | +363.5% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 114.9 | +14.9% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 70.0 | -30.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KOPN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +265.2% vs MVIS's -45.5%
NXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs IRT's 191.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs VUZI's 10.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
IRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 63.6%, current ratio 0.05x
- 7.3% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
- Beta 0.48 vs KOPN's 3.50
- 0.8% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 1.6% vs -10.7%
VUZI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Beta 3.40, yield 10.1%, current ratio 5.56x
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
Among these 5 stocks, MVIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs MVIS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs KOPN's 3.50 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs VUZI's 10.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +265.2% vs MVIS's -45.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.8% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 1.6% vs -10.7% |
KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IRT leads in 1 of 6 categories
KOPN leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • VUZI leads 0 • MVIS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXRT and IRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $662M annually — 547.8x MVIS's $1M. IRT is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $252M | $662M | $5M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $125M | $365M | -$30.9B | -$64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$32M | $48M | -$32.3B | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $79M | $139M | -$20.8B | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +91.1% | +20.2% | -0.0% | -14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | +11.5% | +17.5% | -5.2% | -57.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -12.7% | +7.3% | -5.1% | -78.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.3% | +31.2% | +21.1% | -3.3% | -49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +4933.1% | -86.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +186.7% | 0.0% | -101.4% | +25.0% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXRT and VUZI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IRT's 16.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $755M | $756M | $3.9B | $232M | $189M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $743M | $2.3B | $6.1B | -$19.9B | $193M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.61x | -23.65x | 68.21x | -6.81x | -1.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 99.88x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.60x | 16.71x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.00x | 3.01x | 5.87x | 0.04x | 156.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.51x | 2.52x | 1.07x | 0.01x | 3.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.05x | 26.33x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRT delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. VUZI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.2% | -10.1% | +1.3% | -5.2% | -137.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | -1.7% | +0.8% | -3.2% | -74.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -172.3% | +1.1% | +1.6% | -10.7% | -98.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -143.1% | +1.5% | +2.4% | -184.6% | -93.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 5.18x | 0.64x | 0.04x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $1.5B | $2.2B | -$20.1B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $14M | $48M | $21.2B | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $1.6B | $2.3B | $1.0B | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.47x | 1.73x | — | -3.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KOPN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRT five years ago would be worth $11,775 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $437 for MVIS. Over the past 12 months, KOPN leads with a +265.2% total return vs MVIS's -45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOPN at 69.2% vs MVIS's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.6% | +2.6% | -6.0% | -25.7% | -30.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +265.2% | -15.2% | -11.9% | +63.4% | -45.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +384.4% | -15.5% | +7.4% | -29.6% | -73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | -23.0% | +17.8% | -84.8% | -95.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.5% | +211.1% | +191.8% | -35.7% | -66.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +69.2% | -5.5% | +2.4% | -11.0% | -35.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KOPN and IRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOPN's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KOPN currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs MVIS's 35.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.50x | 0.62x | 0.48x | 3.40x | 2.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.04 | $38.30 | $19.61 | $4.29 | $1.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $23.79 | $14.60 | $1.71 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +77.8% | +83.5% | +66.7% | +35.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 71.0 | 62.4 | 61.1 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 216K | 2.2M | 924K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and VUZI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KOPN as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", IRT as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 10.10% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $27.00 | $20.08 | $6.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 27 | 5 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +4.0% | +10.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | $0.66 | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IRT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). KOPN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
KOPN vs NXRT vs IRT vs VUZI vs MVIS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) offers the better valuation at 68. 2x trailing P/E (99. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kopin Corporation (KOPN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS?
Over the past 5 years, Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) delivered a total return of +17. 8%, compared to -95. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus MVIS's -66. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Kopin Corporation's 3. 50β — meaning KOPN is approximately 624% more volatile than IRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vuzix Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS?
Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRT leads at 18. 4% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 711.
7% to $5. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. KOPN, MVIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KOPN or NXRT or IRT or VUZI or MVIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 4. 0% yield, +191. 8% 10Y return). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRT: +191. 8%, MVIS: -66. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KOPN and NXRT and IRT and VUZI and MVIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (KOPN (Technology) and NXRT (Real Estate) and IRT (Real Estate) and VUZI (Technology) and MVIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KOPN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NXRT, IRT, VUZI pay a dividend while KOPN, MVIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.