Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $8M | $7.53B | $9.63B | $2.12B | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $-92K | $52M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-450M | $-327M | $-290M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | — | — | 87.2% | -64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | — | — | -5.8% | -281.0% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $57K | $0.00 | $110K | $80M | $294M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $262M | $357M | $737M | $295M |
KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiora Pharmaceutica… (KPRX) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 549.5 | +449.5% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KPRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 22.5% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
NUVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.09
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 67.8%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
- Beta 1.09 vs BEAM's 2.14
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs KPRX's -26.9%
OCUL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 12.2%, current ratio 15.39x
BEAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- -4.6% ROA vs OCUL's -48.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs OCUL's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs BEAM's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs KPRX's -26.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs OCUL's -48.4% |
KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • NUVL leads 0 • OCUL leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KPRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $132M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. KPRX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCUL's -5.6%. On growth, OCUL holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | -$92,000 | $52M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$346M | -$357M | -$295M | -$355M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$450M | -$327M | -$290M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$313M | -$283M | -$241M | -$384M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | — | — | +87.2% | -64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | — | — | -5.8% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | — | — | -5.6% | -49.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | — | — | -4.6% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +0.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.8% | -17.8% | +2.7% | -5.3% | +26.6% |
Valuation Metrics
KPRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $7.5B | $9.6B | $2.1B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $7.3B | $9.3B | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.82x | -17.50x | -24.72x | -6.82x | -38.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.03x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | — | — | 40.90x | 23.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 5.96x | 8.54x | 2.77x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.98x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KPRX and BEAM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-65 for OCUL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEAM's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KPRX scores 8/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.4% | -42.8% | -43.0% | -64.6% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.8% | -37.8% | -40.2% | -48.4% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.2% | -32.5% | -65.0% | — | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | -34.4% | -49.3% | -46.0% | -33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.00x | 0.12x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$262M | -$357M | -$657M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $262M | $357M | $737M | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57,170 | $0 | $110,000 | $80M | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -430.61x | -26.85x | — | -24.63x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for KPRX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs KPRX's -26.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs KPRX's -52.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +1.5% | +16.4% | -18.1% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.9% | +53.5% | +775.0% | +37.3% | +93.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | +171.2% | +1976.5% | +51.2% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +446.1% | -20.8% | -40.4% | -55.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +446.1% | -20.1% | -10.6% | +67.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.4% | +39.5% | +174.9% | +14.8% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NUVL and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVL is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs KPRX's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.09x | 1.55x | 1.27x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.18 | $113.02 | $356.00 | $16.44 | $36.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.76 | $63.56 | $35.18 | $6.23 | $15.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +90.6% | +93.6% | +58.9% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 52.9 | 55.6 | 58.3 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 597K | 544K | 378K | 4.0M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NUVL as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", OCUL as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.4% upside for OCUL (target: $26) vs 29.7% for BEAM (target: $41).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $144.40 | $544.40 | $25.50 | $40.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 16 | 18 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
KPRX vs NUVL vs PRAX vs OCUL vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (KPRX) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -99. 8% for Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (KPRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus KPRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning BEAM is approximately 96% more volatile than NUVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 24% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 103. 6% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM?
Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(KPRX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -513. 2% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KPRX leads at 28. 2% versus -521. 0% for OCUL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KPRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is KPRX or NUVL or PRAX or OCUL or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +446. 1% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +446. 1%, BEAM: +67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KPRX and NUVL and PRAX and OCUL and BEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KPRX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCUL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.