Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $8M | $2.12B | $398M | $104M | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $52M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-290M | $-223M | $-43M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 87.2% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | -5.8% | — | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | — | — | 24.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $57K | $80M | $25M | $15M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $737M | $78M | $55M | $147M |
KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiora Pharmaceutica… (KPRX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL) | 100 | 137.1 | +37.1% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 11.5 | -88.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KPRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth 103.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 22.5% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
- -25.8% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2%
OCUL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.27
- -10.6% 10Y total return vs ALDX's -72.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 12.2%, current ratio 15.39x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 15.39x
RCKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 10.5% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
Among these 5 stocks, ALDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EDIT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +127.8% vs RCKT's -45.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs OCUL's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -25.8% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KPRX leads in 3 of 6 categories
OCUL leads 1 • RCKT leads 0 • ALDX leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KPRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCUL and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $52M and $0 in trailing revenue. KPRX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCUL's -5.6%. On growth, OCUL holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $52M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$295M | -$232M | -$45M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$290M | -$223M | -$43M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$241M | -$190M | -$40M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +87.2% | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | -5.8% | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | -5.6% | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | -4.6% | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.8% | — | — | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.8% | -5.3% | +38.7% | +48.0% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
KPRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $2.1B | $398M | $104M | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $1.5B | $345M | $65M | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.82x | -6.82x | -1.83x | -1.84x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 24.71x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.03x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 40.90x | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 2.77x | 1.47x | 1.45x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.98x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KPRX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KPRX delivers a -36.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-36 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. KPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KPRX scores 8/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.4% | -64.6% | -80.5% | -87.7% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.8% | -48.4% | -67.5% | -55.5% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.2% | — | -63.2% | -3.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | -46.0% | -58.9% | -56.7% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.12x | 0.09x | 0.22x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$657M | -$53M | -$39M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $737M | $78M | $55M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57,170 | $80M | $25M | $15M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -430.61x | -24.63x | — | -21.72x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCUL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OCUL five years ago would be worth $5,957 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for KPRX. Over the past 12 months, EDIT leads with a +127.8% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCUL at 14.8% vs KPRX's -52.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -18.1% | +6.1% | -63.0% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.9% | +37.3% | -45.2% | -13.9% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | +51.2% | -82.8% | -83.8% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -40.4% | -91.6% | -86.1% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -10.6% | -91.3% | -72.1% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.4% | +14.8% | -44.4% | -45.5% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OCUL and EDIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCUL is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDIT currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs ALDX's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.11x | 1.21x | 1.28x | 2.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.18 | $16.44 | $7.39 | $6.18 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.76 | $6.23 | $2.19 | $1.07 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +58.9% | +49.7% | +28.0% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 58.3 | 54.4 | 42.9 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 597K | 4.0M | 3.5M | 3.6M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OCUL as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", ALDX as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.0% upside for ALDX (target: $10) vs 36.2% for RCKT (target: $5).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.50 | $5.00 | $9.67 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 19 | 19 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KPRX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OCUL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
KPRX vs OCUL vs RCKT vs ALDX vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the stronger pick with -18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (KPRX) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) delivered a total return of -40. 4%, compared to -99. 8% for Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (KPRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OCUL returned -10. 9% versus KPRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning EDIT is approximately 120% more volatile than OCUL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (KPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 66% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is pulling ahead at -18. 7% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 103. 6% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT?
Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(KPRX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -513. 2% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KPRX leads at 28. 2% versus -521. 0% for OCUL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KPRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALDX: 459.
0% to $9. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KPRX or OCUL or RCKT or ALDX or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11)). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCUL: -10. 9%, EDIT: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KPRX and OCUL and RCKT and ALDX and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KPRX is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCUL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.