Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.77B | $8.50B | $12.58B | $2.14B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $1.10B | $3.30B | $762M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $217M | $100M | $91M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | 55.6% | 83.7% | 68.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 25.6% | 1.9% | 15.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 26.8x | 19.6x | 12.7x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $121M | $112M | $485M | $10M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.06B | $329M | $882M | $151M | $86.81B |
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 72.6 | -27.4% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 213.3 | +113.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KVYO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.6%, EPS growth 35.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.7%
- 31.6% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
MANH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 19.7% margin vs KVYO's -0.7%
- 28.0% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 236.8% vs -22.2%
Among these 5 stocks, HUBS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- PEG 0.89 vs MANH's 1.25
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs MANH's 145.1%
- +43.7% vs HUBS's -62.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.6% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs KVYO's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 236.8% vs -22.2% |
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MANH leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPSC leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • KVYO leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 974.7x SPSC's $762M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KVYO's -0.7%. On growth, KVYO holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $1.1B | $3.3B | $762M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $288M | $166M | $162M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $217M | $100M | $91M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | $380M | $712M | $167M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.6% | +55.6% | +83.7% | +68.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +25.6% | +1.9% | +15.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +19.7% | +3.0% | +11.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +34.5% | +21.6% | +21.9% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.9% | +7.4% | +23.4% | +5.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.0% | -3.5% | +2.5% | -8.6% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, SPSC trades at a 92% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MANH's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $8.5B | $12.6B | $2.1B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $8.3B | $12.2B | $2.0B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -143.32x | 39.88x | 284.08x | 23.24x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.06x | 26.79x | 19.61x | 12.73x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.86x | — | 1.62x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 28.67x | 69.24x | 11.30x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.87x | 7.86x | 4.02x | 2.84x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.83x | 27.85x | 6.29x | 2.23x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.17x | 22.74x | 17.77x | 14.04x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-1 for KVYO. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs KVYO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.8% | +78.2% | +5.0% | +9.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +28.0% | +2.7% | +7.9% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.2% | +2.4% | +0.4% | +12.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.7% | +76.3% | +0.5% | +12.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.36x | 0.23x | 0.01x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$944M | -$216M | -$397M | -$141M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $329M | $882M | $151M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $121M | $112M | $485M | $10M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4753.07x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,794 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.2% | -14.2% | -36.1% | -35.0% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.1% | -21.9% | -62.0% | -59.7% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | -15.3% | -45.1% | -62.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +8.1% | -52.1% | -41.9% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +145.1% | +469.1% | +119.8% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.6% | -5.4% | -18.1% | -28.0% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.10x | 1.18x | 1.03x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.79 | $247.22 | $682.57 | $153.16 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.31 | $119.06 | $187.45 | $50.56 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.7% | +58.1% | +35.8% | +37.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.0 | 50.6 | 51.1 | 46.9 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 678K | 1.5M | 605K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KVYO as "Buy", MANH as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.1% upside for KVYO (target: $33) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.13 | $197.25 | $360.89 | $68.71 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 15 | 47 | 23 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +4.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% |
MANH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Klaviyo, Inc.
(KVYO) is the stronger pick with 31. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 89x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -52. 1% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus KVYO's -51. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 47% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Klaviyo, Inc.
(KVYO) is pulling ahead at 31. 6% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KVYO leads at 37. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -2. 6% for Klaviyo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -5. 5% for KVYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KVYO: 110. 1% to $33. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, KVYO: -51. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KVYO and MANH and HUBS and SPSC and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KVYO (Technology) and MANH (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and SPSC (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KVYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.