Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KVYO
Klaviyo, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.77B
5Y Perf.-54.3%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.50B
5Y Perf.-27.4%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.58B
5Y Perf.-50.4%
SPSC
SPS Commerce, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.14B
5Y Perf.-66.5%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+113.3%

KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KVYO logoKVYO
MANH logoMANH
HUBS logoHUBS
SPSC logoSPSC
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$4.77B$8.50B$12.58B$2.14B$2.92T
Revenue (TTM)$1.31B$1.10B$3.30B$762M$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$217M$100M$91M$90.80B
Gross Margin74.6%55.6%83.7%68.0%50.6%
Operating Margin-3.2%25.6%1.9%15.3%11.5%
Forward P/E19.1x26.8x19.6x12.7x34.8x
Total Debt$121M$112M$485M$10M$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$1.06B$329M$882M$151M$86.81B

KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KVYO
MANH
HUBS
SPSC
AMZN
StockSep 23May 26Return
Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO)10045.7-54.3%
Manhattan Associate… (MANH)10072.6-27.4%
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)10049.6-50.4%
SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC)10033.5-66.5%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100213.3+113.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MANH and SPSC are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. SPS Commerce, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. KVYO and AMZN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KVYO
Klaviyo, Inc.
The Growth Play

KVYO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 31.6%, EPS growth 35.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.7%
  • 31.6% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
Best for: growth exposure
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

MANH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 19.7% margin vs KVYO's -0.7%
  • 28.0% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 236.8% vs -22.2%
Best for: quality and efficiency
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, HUBS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
SPSC
SPS Commerce, Inc.
The Income Pick

SPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.03
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
  • PEG 0.89 vs MANH's 1.25
  • Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs MANH's 145.1%
  • +43.7% vs HUBS's -62.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKVYO logoKVYO31.6% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
ValueSPSC logoSPSCLower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24
Quality / MarginsMANH logoMANH19.7% margin vs KVYO's -0.7%
Stability / SafetySPSC logoSPSCBeta 1.03 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMZN logoAMZN+43.7% vs HUBS's -62.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MANH logoMANH28.0% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 236.8% vs -22.2%

KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KVYOKlaviyo, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MANHManhattan Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
46.5%$503M
Cloud Subscriptions
37.7%$408M
Maintenance
12.0%$130M
Hardware
2.4%$25M
License and Maintenance
1.4%$15M
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
97.8%$3.1B
Service
2.2%$67M
SPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMANHLAGGINGHUBS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 974.7x SPSC's $762M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KVYO's -0.7%. On growth, KVYO holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.SPSC logoSPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$1.1B$3.3B$762M$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$28M$288M$166M$162M$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$217M$100M$91M$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$224M$380M$712M$167M-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.6%+55.6%+83.7%+68.0%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%+25.6%+1.9%+15.3%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.7%+19.7%+3.0%+11.9%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.0%+34.5%+21.6%+21.9%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.9%+7.4%+23.4%+5.8%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.0%-3.5%+2.5%-8.6%+74.8%
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPSC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 23.2x trailing earnings, SPSC trades at a 92% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MANH's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.SPSC logoSPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.8B$8.5B$12.6B$2.1B$2.92T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.8B$8.3B$12.2B$2.0B$2.98T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-143.32x39.88x284.08x23.24x37.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.06x26.79x19.61x12.73x34.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.86x1.62x1.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.67x69.24x11.30x20.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.87x7.86x4.02x2.84x4.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.83x27.85x6.29x2.23x7.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.17x22.74x17.77x14.04x378.98x
SPSC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-1 for KVYO. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs KVYO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.SPSC logoSPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.8%+78.2%+5.0%+9.5%+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%+28.0%+2.7%+7.9%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-22.2%+2.4%+0.4%+12.2%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.7%+76.3%+0.5%+12.5%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.36x0.23x0.01x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$944M-$216M-$397M-$141M$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$329M$882M$151M$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$121M$112M$485M$10M$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4753.07x39.96x
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,794 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.SPSC logoSPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-46.2%-14.2%-36.1%-35.0%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-53.1%-21.9%-62.0%-59.7%+43.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%-15.3%-45.1%-62.6%+156.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%+8.1%-52.1%-41.9%+64.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%+145.1%+469.1%+119.8%+697.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-21.6%-5.4%-18.1%-28.0%+36.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.SPSC logoSPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.30x1.10x1.18x1.03x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.79$247.22$682.57$153.16$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.31$119.06$187.45$50.56$185.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.7%+58.1%+35.8%+37.3%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.050.651.146.981.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.2M678K1.5M605K45.5M
Evenly matched — SPSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KVYO as "Buy", MANH as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.1% upside for KVYO (target: $33) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.SPSC logoSPSCSPS Commerce, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.13$197.25$360.89$68.71$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts2215472394
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.7%+4.0%+5.3%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MANH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallManhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Klaviyo, Inc.

(KVYO) is the stronger pick with 31. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?

On trailing P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc.

(SPSC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 89x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -52. 1% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus KVYO's -51. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.

(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 47% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Klaviyo, Inc.

(KVYO) is pulling ahead at 31. 6% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KVYO leads at 37. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -2. 6% for Klaviyo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -5. 5% for KVYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KVYO: 110. 1% to $33. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, KVYO: -51. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KVYO and MANH and HUBS and SPSC and AMZN?

These companies operate in different sectors (KVYO (Technology) and MANH (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and SPSC (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KVYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KVYO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MANH

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUBS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPSC

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KVYO and MANH and HUBS and SPSC and AMZN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KVYO: 27.9% · MANH: 7.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.