REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.31B | $3.23B | $419M | $661M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $388M | $1.54B | $442M | $264M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $104M | $-104M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 62.6% | 87.1% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 58.3% | 48.0% | 51.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 12.0x | — | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.51B | $16.16B | $4.69B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $453M | $85M | $88M |
LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) | 100 | 129.4 | +29.4% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LADR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 84.6% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 53.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 0.50x
- Beta 0.65, yield 9.1%, current ratio 0.50x
- Beta 0.65 vs KREF's 0.87, lower leverage
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -14.0%, EPS growth 154.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
KREF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 15.3% yield, vs TRTX's 13.4%
TRTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 13.4%
- 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LADR's -23.3%
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 12.0x)
- 23.2% margin vs KREF's -23.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LADR's -23.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs KREF's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs KREF's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, vs TRTX's 13.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.5% vs KREF's -18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs 3.4% |
LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
KREF leads 1 • LADR leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.8x TRTX's $264M. TRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KREF's -23.6%. On growth, BXMT holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $388M | $1.5B | $442M | $264M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $273M | $948M | $140M | $144M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $104M | -$104M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $87M | $335M | $65M | $96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +62.6% | +87.1% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +58.3% | +48.0% | +51.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +6.7% | -23.6% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +21.8% | +14.8% | +36.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | +4.0% | -13.8% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.0% | — | -5.4% | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, TRTX trades at a 50% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRTX's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KREF's 18.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.2B | $419M | $661M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $18.9B | $5.0B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.12x | 29.88x | -6.21x | 15.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.19x | 11.96x | — | 8.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.27x | 16.35x | 18.33x | 15.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.33x | 2.12x | 0.92x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.93x | 0.36x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.00x | 11.69x | 6.29x | 7.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-8 for KREF. LADR carries lower financial leverage with a 2.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXMT scores 6/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +2.9% | -8.4% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.5% | -1.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +4.3% | +3.4% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +11.3% | +4.5% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.37x | 4.61x | 3.83x | 3.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $15.7B | $4.6B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $453M | $85M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $16.2B | $4.7B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | 1.11x | 0.84x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LADR five years ago would be worth $12,831 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,407 for KREF. Over the past 12 months, TRTX leads with a +24.5% total return vs KREF's -18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 26.8% vs KREF's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | +0.6% | -18.2% | -0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.6% | +11.1% | -18.6% | +24.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.2% | +45.7% | -2.5% | +103.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.3% | -3.3% | -35.9% | +6.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.6% | +53.4% | -9.4% | -1.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.9% | +13.4% | -0.8% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LADR and BXMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LADR is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KREF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs KREF's 65.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.74x | 0.87x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.92 | $20.67 | $9.98 | $9.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.61 | $17.67 | $5.29 | $7.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.1% | +92.5% | +65.3% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 40.4 | 51.3 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 848K | 1.4M | 1.6M | 666K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KREF and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LADR as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", KREF as "Buy", TRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.7% upside for LADR (target: $13) vs 7.4% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, KREF offers the higher dividend yield at 15.35% vs LADR's 9.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | — | $7.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 18 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.1% | +9.9% | +15.3% | +13.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.93 | $1.89 | $1.00 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +3.4% | +10.4% | +3.8% |
TRTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KREF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LADR vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the stronger pick with 123. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 3% for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
On trailing P/E, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
Over the past 5 years, Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) delivered a total return of +28.
3%, compared to -35. 9% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LADR returned +84. 6% versus KREF's -9. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning KREF is approximately 35% more volatile than LADR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is pulling ahead at 123. 3% versus -23. 3% for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus -10. 3% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRTX leads at 73. 0% versus 59. 3% for KREF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LADR: 26. 7% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) offers the highest yield at 15. 3%, versus 9. 1% for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR).
09Is LADR or BXMT or KREF or TRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65), 9. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LADR: +84. 6%, KREF: -9. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LADR and BXMT and KREF and TRTX?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LADR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.