Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $16M | $760M | $33M | $63.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $592M | $81M | $2.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $26M | $-5M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 25.3% | 29.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -126.5% | 6.5% | -4.3% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.3x | — | 114.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $67M | $10M | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $534K | $3M | $6M | $521M |
LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laser Photonics Cor… (LASE) | 100 | 28.0 | -72.0% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 317.6 | +217.6% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1302.0 | +1202.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LASE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.68
LYTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 1.99x
- Beta 1.43, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.99x
- 22.1% revenue growth vs LASE's -13.3%
- Lower P/E (22.3x vs 114.4x)
OESX is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.10 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage
LITE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 108.5%
- 17.7% margin vs LASE's -105.4%
- +12.5% vs LASE's -74.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs LASE's -13.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.3x vs 114.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs LASE's -105.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs LASE's -74.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs LASE's -43.1%, ROIC -4.3% vs -42.1% |
LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LITE leads in 2 of 6 categories
LYTS leads 2 • LASE leads 0 • OESX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 348.5x LASE's $7M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LASE's -105.4%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $592M | $81M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $51M | -$1M | $425M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $26M | -$5M | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $38M | $348M | $399M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +25.3% | +29.9% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -126.5% | +6.5% | -4.3% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -105.4% | +4.3% | -5.6% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -58.7% | +6.4% | +4.3% | +16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | -0.5% | +7.7% | +90.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +11.1% | +109.6% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LYTS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, LYTS trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LYTS's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16M | $760M | $33M | $63.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $823M | $37M | $65.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.29x | 30.91x | -2.57x | 2412.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.34x | — | 114.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.82x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.03x | — | 859.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.70x | 1.33x | 0.41x | 38.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 3.26x | 2.56x | 54.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.94x | 66.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-184 for LASE. LYTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs LASE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -183.5% | +10.9% | -0.0% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.1% | +6.5% | -0.0% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.1% | +9.5% | -34.8% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -45.9% | +12.6% | -34.9% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.29x | 0.87x | 2.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $63M | $4M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $533,871 | $3M | $6M | $521M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $67M | $10M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.60x | 13.52x | -3.29x | 9.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs LASE's -74.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs LASE's -38.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.8% | +32.8% | -38.0% | +131.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.1% | +58.0% | +31.2% | +1247.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +100.0% | -38.7% | +1764.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | +223.4% | -83.6% | +976.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | +108.5% | -32.5% | +3635.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.4% | +26.0% | -15.1% | +165.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYTS and OESX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs LASE's 10.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.43x | 1.10x | 2.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.77 | $24.75 | $18.64 | $1021.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $15.31 | $5.50 | $60.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.7% | +98.7% | +49.6% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.5 | 70.1 | 41.8 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 378K | 39K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LASE and LYTS each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", LITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs -28.0% for LITE (target: $643). LYTS is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | — | $643.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.1% |
LITE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LYTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LASE vs LYTS vs OESX vs LITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE). LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE?
On trailing P/E, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the cheapest at 30. 9x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, LSI Industries Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus LASE's -72. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning LITE is approximately 145% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -13. 3% for Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for LSI Industries Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE?
LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -73. 8% for Laser Photonics Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYTS leads at 6. 2% versus -189. 3% for LASE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LASE leads at 43. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) trades at 22. 3x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 92. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 10. 6% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE?
In this comparison, LYTS (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LASE, OESX, LITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LASE or LYTS or OESX or LITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +108. 5% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYTS: +108. 5%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LASE and LYTS and OESX and LITE?
These companies operate in different sectors (LASE (Industrials) and LYTS (Technology) and OESX (Industrials) and LITE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LASE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LYTS pays a dividend while LASE, OESX, LITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.