Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LBRX vs AXSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LBRX vs AXSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $113M | $11.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $708M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $-188M |
| Gross Margin | — | 92.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.8% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $241M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $323M |
Quick Verdict: LBRX vs AXSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LBRX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 5.1% margin vs AXSM's -26.6%
- -27.6% ROA vs AXSM's -27.8%
AXSM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.69
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
- 18.9% 10Y total return vs LBRX's 84.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs AXSM's -26.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs LBRX's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.5% vs LBRX's +84.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -27.6% ROA vs AXSM's -27.8% |
LBRX vs AXSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LBRX vs AXSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXSM and LBRX operate at a comparable scale, with $708M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $708M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$167M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | -$188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +92.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AXSM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.79x | -59.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 17.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 124.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LBRX and AXSM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRX delivers a -71.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-72 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AXSM scores 4/9 vs LBRX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -71.9% | -2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.6% | -27.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -189.4% | -52.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$82M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $323M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $241M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -34.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXSM five years ago would be worth $38,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,486 for LBRX. Over the past 12 months, AXSM leads with a +98.5% total return vs LBRX's +84.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXSM at 41.5% vs LBRX's 22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.5% | +23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.9% | +98.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +183.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +286.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +1886.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | +41.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LBRX and AXSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRX's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.47 | $233.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.36 | $96.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 78.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 667K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LBRX as "Buy" and AXSM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for LBRX (target: $38) vs 2.6% for AXSM (target: $226).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $225.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AXSM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
LBRX vs AXSM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LBRX or AXSM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate LB Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock (LBRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LBRX or AXSM?
Over the past 5 years, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) delivered a total return of +286. 4%, compared to +84. 9% for LB Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock (LBRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +1886% versus LBRX's +84. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LBRX or AXSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus LB Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock's 0. 70β — meaning LBRX is approximately 1% more volatile than AXSM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LBRX or AXSM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 38. 6% year-over-year, compared to -907. 3% for LB Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LBRX or AXSM?
LB Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock (LBRX) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -28. 7% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LBRX leads at 0. 0% versus -26. 5% for AXSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LBRX or AXSM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LBRX or AXSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), +1886% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +1886%, LBRX: +84. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LBRX and AXSM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LBRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.