Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LGPS
LogProstyle Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateAMEX • JP
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-76.4%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+90.7%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-77.6%
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-43.3%
SPOK
Spok Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$225M
5Y Perf.-34.1%

LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LGPS logoLGPS
CODA logoCODA
LPSN logoLPSN
MNDO logoMNDO
SPOK logoSPOK
IndustryReal Estate - ServicesAerospace & DefenseSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$17M$134M$32M$21M$225M
Revenue (TTM)$10.20B$28M$244M$19M$103M
Net Income (TTM)$387M$4M$-67M$3M$11M
Gross Margin17.8%66.3%62.2%51.0%91.4%
Operating Margin6.6%17.4%-9.6%10.7%13.2%
Forward P/E3.1x22.5x7.8x16.4x
Total Debt$17.38B$395K$392M$929K$7M
Cash & Equiv.$2.12B$29M$95M$8M$25M

LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LGPS
CODA
LPSN
MNDO
SPOK
StockMar 25May 26Return
LogProstyle Inc. (LGPS)10023.6-76.4%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100190.7+90.7%
LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN)10022.4-77.6%
MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO)10056.7-43.3%
Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK)10065.9-34.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNDO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. LogProstyle Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CODA also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LGPS
LogProstyle Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

LGPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 46.2%, EPS growth 121.1%
  • 46.2% FFO/revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
  • Lower P/E (3.1x vs 16.4x)
Best for: growth exposure
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CODA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.3%
  • 14.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
  • +78.9% vs LGPS's -85.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Technology Pick

LPSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Income Pick

MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Beta 0.07 vs LPSN's 2.05
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SPOK
Spok Holdings, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, SPOK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLGPS logoLGPS46.2% FFO/revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
ValueLGPS logoLGPSLower P/E (3.1x vs 16.4x)
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
Stability / SafetyMNDO logoMNDOBeta 0.07 vs LPSN's 2.05
DividendsMNDO logoMNDO21.6% yield, vs SPOK's 11.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs LGPS's -85.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MNDO logoMNDO8.6% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs -6.6%

LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LGPSLogProstyle Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate
90.4%$18.4B
Hotel
6.8%$1.4B
Product and Service, Other
2.6%$524M
Rental Services
0.2%$40M
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosted Services - Business
85.2%$208M
Professional Services
14.8%$36M
MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
FY 2025
Service
96.2%$19M
License
3.8%$733,000
SPOKSpok Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Wireless Operations
28.2%$73M
Paging
26.6%$69M
Software Operations
26.1%$67M
License and Maintenance
14.2%$36M
License
2.9%$7M
Product and Service, Other
1.5%$4M
Hardware
0.5%$1M

LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGSPOK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LGPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 524.3x MNDO's $19M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLGPS logoLGPSLogProstyle Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdSPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10.2B$28M$244M$19M$103M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$768M$6M-$562,000$2M$17M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$387M$4M-$67M$3M$11M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1.1B$7M-$43M$4M$26M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.8%+66.3%+62.2%+51.0%+91.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.6%+17.4%-9.6%+10.7%+13.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.8%+14.8%-27.6%+13.4%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.6%+24.6%-17.4%+20.9%+24.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.4%+28.8%-19.0%-6.0%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.4%+3.0%+79.4%-23.4%-64.0%
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LGPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.1x trailing earnings, LGPS trades at a 90% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.

MetricLGPS logoLGPSLogProstyle Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdSPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Market CapShares × price$17M$134M$32M$21M$225M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$114M$106M$329M$13M$206M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS3.15x32.16x-0.22x7.77x14.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.45x16.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.00x17.85x5.68x8.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x5.05x0.13x1.06x1.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.67x2.30x0.90x1.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.46x22.20x5.20x8.91x
LGPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MNDO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for CODA. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGPS's 4.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGPS scores 7/9 vs MNDO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLGPS logoLGPSLogProstyle Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdSPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.0%+7.2%+11.9%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+6.6%-12.4%+8.6%+5.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+11.2%-6.6%+8.6%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.6%+8.1%-5.8%+7.8%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.94x0.01x0.04x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$15.3B-$28M$297M-$7M-$18M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.1B$29M$95M$8M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17.4B$394,932$392M$929,000$7M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.39x0.20x
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs LGPS's -85.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLGPS logoLGPSLogProstyle Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdSPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-29.1%+25.1%-31.1%-13.7%-14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-85.2%+78.9%-77.1%-34.8%-26.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.5%+34.5%-95.8%-24.2%+13.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.5%+49.7%-99.7%-35.0%+61.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.5%+844.4%-97.0%+66.7%+13.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-42.0%+10.4%-65.4%-8.8%+4.3%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs LGPS's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLGPS logoLGPSLogProstyle Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdSPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.00x2.05x0.07x0.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.20$17.28$21.60$1.64$19.31
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$5.98$2.37$0.98$9.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+9.7%+68.9%+12.4%+61.6%+56.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.648.640.327.436.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded28K256K148K37K185K
Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MNDO and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for SPOK (target: $15) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs SPOK's 11.95%.

MetricLGPS logoLGPSLogProstyle Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdSPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+21.6%+11.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises005
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.22$1.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.6%+1.3%
Evenly matched — MNDO and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LGPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LGPS vs CODA vs LPSN vs MNDO vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LogProstyle Inc.

(LGPS) is the stronger pick with 46. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). LogProstyle Inc. (LGPS) offers the better valuation at 3. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK?

On trailing P/E, LogProstyle Inc.

(LGPS) is the cheapest at 3. 1x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK?

Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 2868% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for LogProstyle Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LogProstyle Inc.

(LGPS) is pulling ahead at 46. 2% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LogProstyle Inc. grew EPS 121. 1% year-over-year, compared to -43. 5% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOK: 38. 5% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK?

In this comparison, MNDO (21.

6% yield), SPOK (11. 9% yield) pay a dividend. LGPS, CODA, LPSN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LGPS or CODA or LPSN or MNDO or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LGPS and CODA and LPSN and MNDO and SPOK?

These companies operate in different sectors (LGPS (Real Estate) and CODA (Industrials) and LPSN (Technology) and MNDO (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LGPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. MNDO, SPOK pay a dividend while LGPS, CODA, LPSN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LGPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPSN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNDO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 8.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPOK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LGPS and CODA and LPSN and MNDO and SPOK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LGPS: 23.4% · CODA: 28.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(LGPS: 3.8% · CODA: 14.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LGPS: 3.1x · CODA: 32.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.