Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Information Technology Services
LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $16M | $26M | $225M | $802M | $350M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.20B | $244M | $103M | $1.33B | $306M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $387M | $-67M | $11M | $35M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 71.5% | 91.4% | 27.2% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | -27.7% | 13.2% | 3.8% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 3.1x | — | 16.5x | 18.2x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $17.38B | $392M | $7M | $70M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.12B | $95M | $25M | $2M | $18M |
LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LogProstyle Inc. (LGPS) | 100 | 23.3 | -76.7% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 66.1 | -33.9% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
| The Hackett Group, … (HCKT) | 100 | 47.5 | -52.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 46.2%, EPS growth 121.1%
- 46.2% FFO/revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- Lower P/E (3.1x vs 8.4x)
LPSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- 10.3% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 198.8% 10Y total return vs HCKT's 20.0%
- +20.8% vs LGPS's -83.4%
- 9.2% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs -22.3%
Among these 5 stocks, HCKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.2% FFO/revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.1x vs 8.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KFRC's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.8% vs LGPS's -83.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs -22.3% |
LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPOK leads in 1 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • LGPS leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • HCKT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 98.6x SPOK's $103M. SPOK is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, LGPS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.2B | $244M | $103M | $1.3B | $306M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $768M | -$45M | $17M | $56M | $32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $387M | -$67M | $11M | $35M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | -$43M | $26M | $43M | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +71.5% | +91.4% | +27.2% | +38.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | -27.6% | +10.3% | +2.6% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | -17.4% | +24.7% | +3.3% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.4% | -19.0% | -100.0% | +0.1% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.4% | +81.5% | -64.0% | +2.2% | +75.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGPS and LPSN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.1x trailing earnings, LGPS trades at a 89% valuation discount to HCKT's 29.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPOK's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16M | $26M | $225M | $802M | $350M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $113M | $323M | $207M | $869M | $412M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.12x | -0.20x | 14.49x | 22.38x | 29.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.47x | 18.23x | 8.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.99x | — | 8.95x | 15.63x | 12.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.11x | 1.61x | 0.60x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | — | 1.56x | 6.26x | 5.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.43x | — | 8.94x | 17.13x | 10.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $7 for SPOK. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGPS's 4.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGPS scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | — | +7.3% | +27.2% | +12.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -12.4% | +5.2% | +9.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | -22.3% | +11.3% | +19.1% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | -19.7% | +12.1% | +20.1% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.94x | — | 0.05x | 0.56x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.3B | $297M | -$18M | $68M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $95M | $25M | $2M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.4B | $392M | $7M | $70M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.39x | 0.18x | — | — | 13.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SPOK and KFRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +20.8% total return vs LGPS's -83.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOK at 4.3% vs LPSN's -66.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.2% | -34.7% | -14.0% | +41.3% | -28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.4% | -80.3% | -26.3% | +20.8% | -46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | -96.3% | +13.4% | -13.7% | -18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | -99.7% | +63.3% | -14.8% | -0.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | -97.1% | +13.1% | +198.8% | +20.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.2% | -66.7% | +4.3% | -4.8% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPOK and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs LGPS's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 2.05x | 0.42x | 0.53x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.20 | $21.60 | $19.31 | $47.48 | $26.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $2.37 | $9.96 | $24.49 | $12.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.6% | +11.8% | +56.3% | +92.4% | +51.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 44.7 | 38.8 | 70.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 145K | 185K | 308K | 275K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SPOK and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPOK as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold", HCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.8% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 38.0% for SPOK (target: $15). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.90% vs HCKT's 3.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.00 | $71.00 | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +11.9% | +3.5% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 5 | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.29 | $1.55 | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +6.3% | +19.7% |
SPOK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KFRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
LGPS vs LPSN vs SPOK vs KFRC vs HCKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LogProstyle Inc.
(LGPS) is the stronger pick with 46. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). LogProstyle Inc. (LGPS) offers the better valuation at 3. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT?
On trailing P/E, LogProstyle Inc.
(LGPS) is the cheapest at 3. 1x versus The Hackett Group, Inc. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, The Hackett Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +63. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +198. 8% versus LPSN's -97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 388% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for LogProstyle Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LogProstyle Inc.
(LGPS) is pulling ahead at 46. 2% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LogProstyle Inc. grew EPS 121. 1% year-over-year, compared to -55. 2% for The Hackett Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCKT leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT?
Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 4% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPOK leads at 14. 1% versus -32. 3% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 61. 8% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), KFRC (3. 5% yield), HCKT (3. 4% yield) pay a dividend. LGPS, LPSN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGPS or LPSN or SPOK or KFRC or HCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 5% yield, +198. 8% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +198. 8%, LPSN: -97. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGPS and LPSN and SPOK and KFRC and HCKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (LGPS (Real Estate) and LPSN (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare) and KFRC (Industrials) and HCKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LGPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SPOK, KFRC, HCKT pay a dividend while LGPS, LPSN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.