LLYVK
Liberty Live Group
Entertainment
Market Cap$8.96B
5Y Perf.+189.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LLYVK vs FWONK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FWONK
Formula One Group
Entertainment
Market Cap$19.76B
5Y Perf.+28.9%
LLYVK vs FWONK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LLYVK | FWONK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $8.96B | $19.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-87M | $449M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | -18.4% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 130.0x | 54.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.67B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $1.05B |
LLYVK vs FWONK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LLYVK
FWONK
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Live Group (LLYVK) | 100 | 289.8 | +189.8% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 128.9 | +28.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LLYVK vs FWONK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FWONK leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Liberty Live Group is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LLYVK
Liberty Live Group
The Momentum Pick
LLYVK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.4% vs FWONK's -3.0%
Best for: momentum
FWONK
Formula One Group
The Income Pick
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth 100.0%
- 381.5% 10Y total return vs LLYVK's 188.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FWONK | -100.0% revenue growth vs LLYVK's -417.2% |
| Value | FWONK | Lower P/E (54.5x vs 130.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% margin vs LLYVK's -5.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FWONK | Beta 0.35 vs LLYVK's 0.82 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LLYVK | +32.4% vs FWONK's -3.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs LLYVK's -1.6% |
LLYVK vs FWONK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
LLYVK vs FWONK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLLYVKLAGGINGFWONK
FWONKFormula One Group
2leads
LLYVKLiberty Live Group
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FWONKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LLYVK3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FWONK1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FWONK5/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LLYVK5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLYVK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLYVK and FWONK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $1.0B in trailing revenue. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LLYVK's -5.9%.
| Metric | LLYVKLiberty Live Group | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$87M | $449M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $403M | $279M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | -18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +43.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.9% | +100.0% |
LLYVK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FWONK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LLYVKLiberty Live Group | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.0B | $19.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.6B | $18.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -102.64x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 130.01x | 54.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.47x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.76x |
FWONK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
FWONK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLYVK scores 4/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | LLYVKLiberty Live Group | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +42.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.0% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $612M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 3.35x |
FWONK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLYVK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLYVK five years ago would be worth $28,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,034 for FWONK. Over the past 12 months, LLYVK leads with a +32.4% total return vs FWONK's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLYVK at 42.3% vs FWONK's 7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LLYVKLiberty Live Group | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.4% | +23.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.4% | +100.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.4% | +381.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.3% | +7.4% |
LLYVK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LLYVK and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LLYVK's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLYVK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs FWONK's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LLYVKLiberty Live Group | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.62 | $109.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.48 | $80.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 324K | 2.1M |
Evenly matched — LLYVK and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LLYVKLiberty Live Group | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LLYVK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FWONK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallLiberty Live Group (LLYVK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LLYVK vs FWONK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LLYVK or FWONK a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LLYVK or FWONK?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Live Group (LLYVK) delivered a total return of +188.
4%, compared to +100. 3% for Formula One Group (FWONK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FWONK returned +381. 5% versus LLYVK's +188. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LLYVK or FWONK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Liberty Live Group's 0. 82β — meaning LLYVK is approximately 132% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LLYVK or FWONK?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Formula One Group grew EPS 100.
0% year-over-year, compared to -179. 4% for Liberty Live Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LLYVK or FWONK?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus -22. 8% for Liberty Live Group — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FWONK leads at -3. 4% versus -12. 7% for LLYVK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLYVK leads at 13. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LLYVK or FWONK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Formula One Group (FWONK) trades at 54.
5x forward P/E versus 130. 0x for Liberty Live Group — 75. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — LLYVK or FWONK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LLYVK or FWONK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Formula One Group (FWONK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), +381. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FWONK: +381. 5%, LLYVK: +188. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LLYVK and FWONK?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.