Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $2.98B | $12.50B | $9.75B | $11.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $1.24B | $6.05B | $17.72B | $7.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $37M | $4M | $183M | $425M |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 34.9% | 41.3% | 44.2% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 9.3% | -0.2% | 5.2% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 46.5x | 99.1x | 22.1x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.92B | $18M | $1.93B | $56.16B | $12.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $341M | $1.60B | $2.06B | $1.46B |
LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | 100 | 622.8 | +522.8% |
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 199.3 | +99.3% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 86.8 | -13.2% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 212.4 | +112.4% |
| Wynn Resorts, Limit… (WYNN) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs RSI's 189.9%
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 20.8x)
- 12.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.1%
RSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.93x
- +138.2% vs DKNG's -27.3%
DKNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1%
Among these 5 stocks, MGM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WYNN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.2% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs DKNG's 0.1%, ROIC 11.6% vs -0.9% |
LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNW leads in 1 of 6 categories
MGM leads 1 • RSI leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • WYNN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 14.3x RSI's $1.2B. LNW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKNG's 0.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $1.2B | $6.1B | $17.7B | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $156M | $266M | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | $37M | $4M | $183M | $425M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $147M | $612M | $1.7B | $872M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +34.9% | +41.3% | +44.2% | +28.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +9.3% | -0.2% | +5.2% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +3.0% | +0.1% | +1.0% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +11.8% | +10.1% | +9.8% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +41.1% | +42.8% | +4.2% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +60.0% | +192.9% | -5.9% | +50.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MGM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, LNW trades at a 87% valuation discount to RSI's 199.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LNW's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $3.0B | $12.5B | $9.8B | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $2.7B | $12.8B | $63.8B | $22.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.62x | 199.21x | -3113.58x | 50.14x | 34.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.89x | 46.52x | 99.14x | 22.10x | 20.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 20.87x | 49.42x | 31.61x | 12.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 2.63x | 2.06x | 0.56x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.02x | 21.70x | 19.81x | 3.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.06x | 18.15x | 19.31x | 5.85x | 16.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LNW and RSI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKNG. RSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNW scores 7/9 vs WYNN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.2% | +12.9% | +0.5% | +5.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +6.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | — | -0.9% | +1.7% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +26.3% | -0.6% | +2.6% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.16x | 0.06x | 3.06x | 17.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | -$322M | $330M | $54.1B | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $341M | $1.6B | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $18M | $1.9B | $56.2B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.67x | — | 1.92x | 1.52x | 2.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,209 for DKNG. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs MGM's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | +44.4% | -29.3% | +4.4% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | +138.2% | -27.3% | +20.1% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | +766.1% | +4.3% | -12.3% | -2.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.9% | +113.9% | -47.9% | -4.5% | -13.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1035.2% | +189.9% | +157.3% | +81.8% | +34.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +105.4% | +1.4% | -4.3% | -0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LNW and RSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNW is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.07x | 1.12x | 1.28x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $122.65 | $29.24 | $48.78 | $40.94 | $134.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $11.50 | $20.46 | $29.19 | $82.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +95.4% | +51.7% | +93.1% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 69.5 | 55.1 | 50.0 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 1.7M | 12.9M | 4.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LNW and WYNN each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LNW as "Hold", RSI as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", WYNN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40). WYNN is the only dividend payer here at 1.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $205.00 | $30.40 | $36.88 | $39.71 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 13 | 48 | 36 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +0.3% | +6.6% | +12.6% | +3.4% |
LNW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MGM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
LNW vs RSI vs DKNG vs MGM vs WYNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
On trailing P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Rush Street Interactive, Inc. at 199. 2x. On forward P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -47. 9% for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus WYNN's +34. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 23% more volatile than LNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 3% for MGM Resorts International. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus 0. 1% for DraftKings Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNW leads at 21. 0% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNW leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 83. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN?
In this comparison, WYNN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. LNW, RSI, DKNG, MGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LNW or RSI or DKNG or MGM or WYNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1035% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNW: +1035%, MGM: +81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LNW and RSI and DKNG and MGM and WYNN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LNW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WYNN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WYNN pays a dividend while LNW, RSI, DKNG, MGM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.