Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.74B | $416M | $4.61B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $137M | $739M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $43M | $243M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 70.2% | 70.8% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 41.4% | 36.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 9.9x | 15.9x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $105M | $0.00 | $197M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $865M | $245M | $763M | $185M |
LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Oak Bancshares… (LOB) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 430.9 | +330.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 31.4%
- +46.2% vs FFIN's -3.2%
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 155.9% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 502.78x
- PEG 0.58 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.83, yield 2.2%, current ratio 502.78x
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.58 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs LOB's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 4 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • LOB leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 7.6x BSVN's $137M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOB's 10.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $137M | $739M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | $58M | $310M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | $43M | $243M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $36M | $290M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +70.2% | +70.8% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +41.4% | +36.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +31.4% | +30.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +33.6% | +39.6% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -3.4% | -7.7% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 53% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.57x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $416M | $4.6B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $979M | $171M | $4.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.95x | 9.77x | 20.76x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.26x | 9.89x | 15.92x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.84x | 0.57x | 3.98x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.29x | 2.95x | 14.17x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 3.03x | 6.23x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 1.68x | 2.89x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.12x | 9.01x | 15.73x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for LOB. LOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBTB's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOB scores 7/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +18.2% | +13.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +2.3% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +18.3% | +11.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +5.2% | +16.0% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | — | 0.12x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$760M | -$245M | -$566M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $865M | $245M | $763M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $0 | $197M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 1.39x | 1.48x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $27,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,692 for LOB. Over the past 12 months, LOB leads with a +46.2% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSVN at 25.5% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +6.9% | +8.5% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | +22.0% | -3.2% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.1% | +97.5% | +29.1% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | +178.4% | -28.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.4% | +155.9% | +145.4% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +25.5% | +8.9% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSVN and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOB's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.83x | 0.95x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.89 | $50.10 | $38.74 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.53 | $36.47 | $28.11 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +87.7% | +83.6% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 55.1 | 58.2 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 11K | 740K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOB as "Buy", BSVN as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.7% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs LOB's 0.32%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $57.00 | $39.25 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 3 | 15 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.2% | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $0.98 | $0.72 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
BSVN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NBTB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
LOB vs BSVN vs FFIN vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +178. 4%, compared to -43. 1% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSVN returned +155. 9% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning LOB is approximately 73% more volatile than BSVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 17% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 10. 0% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 15. 5% for LOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 29. 7% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 3% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB).
09Is LOB or BSVN or FFIN or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 2. 2% yield, +155. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSVN: +155. 9%, LOB: +142. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOB and BSVN and FFIN and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. BSVN, FFIN, NBTB pay a dividend while LOB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.