Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.74B | $4.61B | $1.63B | $2.78B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $739M | $533M | $643M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $243M | $122M | $209M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 70.8% | 75.9% | 79.9% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 36.8% | 31.7% | 43.8% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 15.9x | 12.0x | 14.2x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $105M | $197M | $80M | $991M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $865M | $763M | $157M | $108M | $1.43B |
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Oak Bancshares… (LOB) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- +46.2% vs FFIN's -3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0%
TCBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 1.05 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.93, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.02x
CVBF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.05 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs LOB's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% |
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • TCBK leads 1 • LOB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 6.3x TCBK's $533M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOB's 10.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $739M | $533M | $643M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | $310M | $183M | $294M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | $243M | $122M | $209M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $290M | $124M | $217M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +70.8% | +75.9% | +79.9% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +36.8% | +31.7% | +43.8% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +30.2% | +22.8% | +32.5% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +39.6% | +24.0% | +33.8% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -7.7% | +17.0% | +11.1% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LOB and TCBK and CVBF each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 35% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TCBK offers better value at 1.20x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $4.6B | $1.6B | $2.8B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $979M | $4.0B | $1.6B | $3.7B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.95x | 20.76x | 13.70x | 13.49x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.26x | 15.92x | 12.05x | 14.24x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.84x | 3.98x | 1.20x | 4.25x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.29x | 14.17x | 8.52x | 13.02x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 6.23x | 3.06x | 4.33x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 2.89x | 1.25x | 1.21x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.12x | 15.73x | 12.77x | 12.81x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBK scores 8/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +13.3% | +9.4% | +9.3% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.6% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +11.0% | +8.9% | +6.8% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +16.0% | +10.8% | +9.3% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.12x | 0.06x | 0.43x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$760M | -$566M | -$77M | $883M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $865M | $763M | $157M | $108M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $197M | $80M | $991M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 1.48x | 1.41x | 2.12x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,692 for LOB. Over the past 12 months, LOB leads with a +46.2% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +8.5% | +8.5% | +10.9% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | -3.2% | +33.5% | +13.1% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.1% | +29.1% | +78.3% | +94.0% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | -28.2% | +21.6% | +12.2% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.4% | +145.4% | +129.4% | +67.6% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +8.9% | +21.3% | +24.7% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TCBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TCBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOB's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCBK currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.95x | 0.93x | 0.94x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.89 | $38.74 | $53.18 | $21.48 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.53 | $28.11 | $36.32 | $17.95 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +83.6% | +95.6% | +95.5% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 58.2 | 57.2 | 57.9 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 740K | 142K | 1.6M | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and CVBF and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOB as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", TCBK as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs LOB's 0.32%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $39.25 | $57.33 | $24.75 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +4.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $0.72 | $1.38 | $0.82 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +2.9% | +0.9% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, TriCo Bancshares is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TriCo Bancshares wins at 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -43. 1% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
93β versus Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning LOB is approximately 55% more volatile than TCBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 10. 0% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 15. 5% for LOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 3% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB).
09Is LOB or FFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 2. 7% yield, +129. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCBK: +129. 4%, LOB: +142. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOB and FFIN and TCBK and CVBF and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FFIN, TCBK, CVBF, BOKF pay a dividend while LOB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.