Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.74B | $4.61B | $1.63B | $773M | $416M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $739M | $533M | $305M | $137M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $243M | $122M | $65M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 70.8% | 75.9% | 57.7% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 36.8% | 31.7% | 24.2% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 15.9x | 12.0x | 11.1x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $105M | $197M | $80M | $142M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $865M | $763M | $157M | $193M | $245M |
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Oak Bancshares… (LOB) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| Southern Missouri B… (SMBC) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 430.9 | +330.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 31.4%
- +46.2% vs FFIN's -3.2%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs TCBK's 2.7%
TCBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 2.7%
SMBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 209.1% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 155.9%
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 502.78x
- PEG 0.58 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.83, yield 2.2%, current ratio 502.78x
- NIM 4.5% vs LOB's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 11.1x), PEG 0.58 vs 0.96 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs LOB's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs TCBK's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% |
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories
SMBC leads 1 • LOB leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • TCBK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 7.6x BSVN's $137M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOB's 10.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $739M | $533M | $305M | $137M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | $310M | $183M | $91M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | $243M | $122M | $65M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $290M | $124M | $84M | $36M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +70.8% | +75.9% | +57.7% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +36.8% | +31.7% | +24.2% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +30.2% | +22.8% | +19.1% | +31.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +39.6% | +24.0% | +24.7% | +33.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -7.7% | +17.0% | +24.6% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 53% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.57x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $4.6B | $1.6B | $773M | $416M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $979M | $4.0B | $1.6B | $722M | $171M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.95x | 20.76x | 13.70x | 13.43x | 9.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.26x | 15.92x | 12.05x | 11.12x | 9.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.84x | 3.98x | 1.20x | 1.16x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.29x | 14.17x | 8.52x | 8.59x | 2.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 6.23x | 3.06x | 2.53x | 3.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 2.89x | 1.25x | 1.44x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.12x | 15.73x | 12.77x | 10.27x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for LOB. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMBC's 0.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBK scores 8/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +13.3% | +9.4% | +11.8% | +18.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.6% | +1.2% | +1.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +11.0% | +8.9% | +8.5% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +16.0% | +10.8% | +11.0% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.12x | 0.06x | 0.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$760M | -$566M | -$77M | -$51M | -$245M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $865M | $763M | $157M | $193M | $245M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $197M | $80M | $142M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 1.48x | 1.41x | 0.69x | 1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $27,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,692 for LOB. Over the past 12 months, LOB leads with a +46.2% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMBC at 31.6% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +8.5% | +8.5% | +19.2% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | -3.2% | +33.5% | +34.5% | +22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.1% | +29.1% | +78.3% | +127.9% | +97.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | -28.2% | +21.6% | +69.7% | +178.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.4% | +145.4% | +129.4% | +209.1% | +155.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +8.9% | +21.3% | +31.6% | +25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMBC and BSVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOB's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.95x | 0.93x | 0.86x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.89 | $38.74 | $53.18 | $70.04 | $50.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.53 | $28.11 | $36.32 | $47.60 | $36.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +83.6% | +95.6% | +99.3% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 58.2 | 57.2 | 62.4 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 740K | 142K | 83K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and TCBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOB as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", TCBK as "Buy", SMBC as "Hold", BSVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.7% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 5.6% for SMBC (target: $74). For income investors, TCBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs LOB's 0.32%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $39.25 | $57.33 | $73.50 | $57.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +1.3% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $0.72 | $1.38 | $0.92 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SMBC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LOB vs FFIN vs TCBK vs SMBC vs BSVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +178. 4%, compared to -43. 1% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBC returned +209. 1% versus TCBK's +129. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning LOB is approximately 73% more volatile than BSVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 26% for Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 10. 0% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 15. 5% for LOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCBK leads at 75. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 29. 7% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 3% for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB).
09Is LOB or FFIN or TCBK or SMBC or BSVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.
(SMBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 3% yield, +209. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMBC: +209. 1%, LOB: +142. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOB and FFIN and TCBK and SMBC and BSVN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SMBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock. FFIN, TCBK, SMBC, BSVN pay a dividend while LOB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.