Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Food Distribution
Packaged Foods
LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $14M | $28M | $34.91B | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $338M | $83.57B | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-122M | $-19M | $1.74B | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 2.4% | 40.7% | 18.5% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | -135.7% | -1.8% | 3.6% | -82.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $437M | $53M | $14.49B | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $937K | $7M | $1.07B | $208M |
LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Bounti Corpor… (LOCL) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOCL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.4%, EPS growth 9.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 291.0%
- 38.4% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
FARM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
SYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- 82.2% 10Y total return vs FARM's -95.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs LOCL's -265.2%
- 39.3% ROA vs LOCL's -29.2%, ROIC -44.4% vs -13.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.4% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs LOCL's -265.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs BYND's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.4% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs LOCL's -29.2%, ROIC -44.4% vs -13.2% |
LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 4 of 6 categories
FARM leads 1 • LOCL leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SYY and BYND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 1817.5x LOCL's $46M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOCL's -2.7%. On growth, LOCL holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $338M | $83.6B | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | $5M | $4.0B | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$122M | -$19M | $1.7B | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$3M | $2.0B | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +40.7% | +18.5% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -135.7% | -1.8% | +3.6% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -5.5% | +2.1% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.1% | -0.8% | +2.4% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.1% | -1.2% | +4.7% | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.6% | — | -13.4% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FARM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FARM's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SYY's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $28M | $34.9B | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $450M | $75M | $48.3B | $714M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -1.88x | 19.54x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.88x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.48x | 11.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.08x | 0.43x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.63x | 19.23x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.32x | 19.60x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-48 for FARM. FARM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYY scores 5/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -47.6% | +80.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.2% | -11.7% | +6.4% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | -1.2% | +15.7% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -1.5% | +19.0% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.23x | 7.81x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $436M | $47M | $13.4B | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $937,000 | $7M | $1.1B | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $437M | $53M | $14.5B | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | -1.88x | 4.35x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYY five years ago would be worth $9,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, SYY leads with a +6.4% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYY at 1.3% vs BYND's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.5% | -13.5% | +1.9% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.5% | -28.9% | +6.4% | -64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.1% | -52.2% | +4.0% | -93.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -86.2% | -3.9% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -95.8% | +82.2% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | -21.8% | +1.3% | -59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SYY currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.79x | 0.47x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $2.48 | $91.69 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $1.21 | $68.19 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.3% | +51.6% | +79.5% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 52.1 | 41.7 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 283K | 4.7M | 59.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYY as "Buy", BYND as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 24.1% for SYY (target: $90). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $90.44 | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 30 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 37 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.6% | 0.0% |
SYY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FARM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LOCL vs FARM vs SYY vs BYND: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the stronger pick with 38.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sysco Corporation (SYY) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, Sysco Corporation (SYY) delivered a total return of -3.
9%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYY returned +82. 2% versus LOCL's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 256% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is pulling ahead at 38.
4% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beyond Meat, Inc. grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Farmer Bros. Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOCL leads at 291. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -314. 4% for Local Bounti Corporation — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYY leads at 3. 8% versus -154. 6% for LOCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FARM leads at 43. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889.
9% to $44. 55.
07Which pays a better dividend — LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LOCL, FARM, BYND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LOCL or FARM or SYY or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +82. 2%, BYND: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LOCL and FARM and SYY and BYND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOCL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FARM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SYY pays a dividend while LOCL, FARM, BYND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.