Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Biotechnology
Waste Management
LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Biotechnology | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $68M | $527M | $737M | $339M | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $678M | $327M | $63M | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $48M | $-32M | $-219M | $-18M |
| Gross Margin | 96.3% | 15.0% | 19.6% | -13.3% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 9.2% | 19.4% | -381.6% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.6x | 8.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $4M | $18M | $18M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $39M | $15M | $628M | $12M |
LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loop Industries, In… (LOOP) | 100 | 16.9 | -83.1% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| Granite Ridge Resou… (GRNT) | 100 | 57.0 | -43.0% |
| Bicycle Therapeutic… (BCYC) | 100 | 22.9 | -77.1% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 70.2%, EPS growth 28.7%
- 70.2% revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3%
- +42.4% vs BCYC's -37.1%
IIIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- 7.0% margin vs BCYC's -345.0%
- 10.4% ROA vs BCYC's -29.5%
GRNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 7.9%
- Beta 0.41, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.25x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.41 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage
BCYC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs IIIN's 48.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.2% revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.0% margin vs BCYC's -345.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IIIN's 4.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.4% vs BCYC's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs BCYC's -29.5% |
LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GRNT leads in 3 of 6 categories
IIIN leads 2 • PESI leads 1 • LOOP leads 0 • BCYC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $678M annually — 60.8x LOOP's $11M. IIIN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCYC's -3.4%. On growth, LOOP holds the edge at +65.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $678M | $327M | $63M | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63,000 | $81M | $231M | -$238M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $48M | -$32M | -$219M | -$18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$404,000 | $439,000 | -$39M | -$229M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.3% | +15.0% | +19.6% | -13.3% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +9.2% | +19.4% | -3.8% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.3% | +7.0% | -9.9% | -3.4% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +0.1% | -12.0% | -3.6% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.4% | +23.3% | -100.0% | -91.1% | -20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.0% | +6.1% | -5.8% | +1.1% | -110.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GRNT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, IIIN trades at a 58% valuation discount to GRNT's 31.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GRNT's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IIIN's 6.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $527M | $737M | $339M | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $492M | $740M | -$272M | $200M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.46x | 12.92x | 31.06x | -1.55x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.60x | 8.73x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.78x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.76x | 2.41x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.26x | 0.81x | 1.64x | 4.67x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 182.83x | 1.43x | 1.20x | 0.56x | 4.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.81x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LOOP. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOOP's 8.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIIN scores 6/9 vs BCYC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +13.2% | -5.3% | -35.7% | -34.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.0% | +10.4% | -3.8% | -29.5% | -20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.7% | +14.1% | +9.5% | — | -21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +14.1% | +9.0% | -32.0% | -16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.41x | 0.01x | 0.03x | 0.03x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$35M | $3M | -$611M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $39M | $15M | $628M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $4M | $18M | $18M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.69x | 1192.54x | 7.13x | -1465.53x | -42.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,540 for BCYC. Over the past 12 months, LOOP leads with a +42.4% total return vs BCYC's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs BCYC's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.9% | -16.2% | +21.8% | -26.8% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.4% | -18.7% | +21.3% | -37.1% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | +10.4% | +15.0% | -77.4% | +21.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.5% | -12.0% | -27.0% | -84.6% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | +48.0% | -28.5% | -59.3% | +178.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.5% | +3.3% | +4.8% | -39.1% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GRNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRNT currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs BCYC's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.01x | 0.41x | 1.65x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.29 | $41.64 | $6.72 | $9.36 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.85 | $24.35 | $4.18 | $4.24 | $8.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +65.2% | +83.2% | +52.2% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 39.5 | 51.2 | 57.0 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 74K | 211K | 955K | 464K | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
GRNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IIIN as "Buy", GRNT as "Hold", BCYC as "Buy", PESI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 118.2% upside for BCYC (target: $11) vs 61.1% for PESI (target: $18). For income investors, GRNT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.91% vs IIIN's 4.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $10.67 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 3 | 21 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% | +7.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.11 | $0.44 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GRNT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). IIIN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
LOOP vs IIIN vs GRNT vs BCYC vs PESI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is the stronger pick with 70. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI?
On trailing P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Granite Ridge Resources, Inc at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, Granite Ridge Resources, Inc is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -84. 6% for Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus LOOP's -90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
41β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 354% more volatile than GRNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Loop Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is pulling ahead at 70. 2% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 0% for Bicycle Therapeutics plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCYC leads at 71. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI?
Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -301. 7% for Bicycle Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRNT leads at 20. 2% versus -341. 3% for BCYC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCYC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for Insteel Industries, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCYC: 118. 2% to $10. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI?
In this comparison, GRNT (7.
9% yield), IIIN (4. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LOOP, BCYC, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LOOP or IIIN or GRNT or BCYC or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
41), 7. 9% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRNT: -28. 5%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOOP and IIIN and GRNT and BCYC and PESI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LOOP (Basic Materials) and IIIN (Industrials) and GRNT (Energy) and BCYC (Healthcare) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LOOP is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; GRNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BCYC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IIIN, GRNT pay a dividend while LOOP, BCYC, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.