Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.12B
5Y Perf.+508.2%
CPRT
Copart, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32.77B
5Y Perf.+62.7%
KAR
OPENLANE, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.91B
5Y Perf.+107.2%
EBAY
eBay Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$48.63B
5Y Perf.+102.9%
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.-54.7%

LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LQDT logoLQDT
CPRT logoCPRT
KAR logoKAR
EBAY logoEBAY
OPEN logoOPEN
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Business ServicesAuto - DealershipsSpecialty RetailReal Estate - Services
Market Cap$1.12B$32.77B$2.91B$48.63B$4.08B
Revenue (TTM)$480M$4.61B$1.93B$11.60B$3.94B
Net Income (TTM)$30M$1.56B$178M$2.04B$-1.39B
Gross Margin23.2%45.3%46.2%72.0%7.9%
Operating Margin8.4%36.5%10.2%19.6%-9.9%
Forward P/E24.3x21.5x19.3x17.4x
Total Debt$14M$104M$1.42B$7.38B$193M
Cash & Equiv.$175M$2.78B$142M$1.87B$962M

LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LQDT
CPRT
KAR
EBAY
OPEN
StockJun 20May 26Return
Liquidity Services,… (LQDT)100608.2+508.2%
Copart, Inc. (CPRT)100162.7+62.7%
OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR)100207.2+107.2%
eBay Inc. (EBAY)100202.9+102.9%
Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN)10045.3-54.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CPRT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Liquidity Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. KAR, EBAY, and OPEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
The Growth Play

LQDT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 31.2%, EPS growth 38.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
  • 31.2% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
Best for: growth exposure
CPRT
Copart, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.3% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
  • Beta 0.52, current ratio 8.25x
  • 33.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
KAR
OPENLANE, Inc.
The Income Pick

KAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 1.3% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: dividends
EBAY
eBay Inc.
The Income Pick

EBAY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
  • Lower P/E (17.4x vs 19.3x)
Best for: income & stability
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +5.1% vs CPRT's -44.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLQDT logoLQDT31.2% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
ValueEBAY logoEBAYLower P/E (17.4x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsCPRT logoCPRT33.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Stability / SafetyCPRT logoCPRTBeta 0.52 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
DividendsKAR logoKAR1.3% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)OPEN logoOPEN+5.1% vs CPRT's -44.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CPRT logoCPRT14.7% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 20.1% vs -15.8%

LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$311M
CPRTCopart, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
85.4%$4.0B
Product
14.6%$678M
KAROPENLANE, Inc.
FY 2024
Marketplace
75.9%$1.4B
Finance
24.1%$431M
EBAYeBay Inc.
FY 2025
Marketplaces
82.0%$9.1B
Advertising Revenues
18.0%$2.0B
OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCPRTLAGGINGEBAY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 24.2x LQDT's $480M. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.KAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$480M$4.6B$1.9B$11.6B$3.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$51M$1.9B$288M$2.6B-$363M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M$1.6B$178M$2.0B-$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$78M$1.4B$337M$1.7B$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.2%+45.3%+46.2%+72.0%+7.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+36.5%+10.2%+19.6%-9.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.3%+33.8%+9.2%+17.6%-35.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.2%+30.5%+17.4%+14.5%+27.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.7%-3.6%+0.5%+19.5%-37.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%-10.0%+89.7%+5.7%-50.0%
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.7x trailing earnings, KAR trades at a 60% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KAR's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LQDT's 21.2x.

MetricLQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.KAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$32.8B$2.9B$48.6B$4.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$964M$30.1B$4.2B$54.1B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS41.67x21.30x16.73x24.52x-3.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.33x21.49x19.31x17.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.19x15.73x14.55x21.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.36x7.05x1.51x4.38x0.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.78x3.60x1.93x10.61x4.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.07x26.62x8.66x29.28x3.93x
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.KAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.2%+15.9%+11.6%+44.1%-163.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.0%+14.7%+3.8%+11.5%-53.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+60.8%+20.1%+6.9%+16.8%-15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.3%+19.7%+9.4%+17.4%-11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976865
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.01x0.93x1.60x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$160M-$2.7B$1.3B$5.5B-$769M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$175M$2.8B$142M$1.9B$962M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$104M$1.4B$7.4B$193M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.09x10.52x-8.92x
CPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs CPRT's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.KAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.5%-10.3%-6.1%+22.6%-12.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.0%-44.7%+43.1%+54.2%+510.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+157.1%-14.7%+82.3%+137.4%+159.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.8%+8.8%+61.6%+86.3%-71.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+508.2%+527.2%+99.2%+369.5%-50.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+37.0%-5.2%+22.2%+33.4%+37.4%
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CPRT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.KAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x0.52x0.98x0.73x3.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.83$63.85$31.78$111.38$10.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.67$32.20$19.02$67.87$0.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.4%+53.0%+86.3%+95.5%+48.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10081.647.540.963.156.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded159K7.8M976K5.4M36.3M
Evenly matched — CPRT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KAR and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LQDT as "Buy", CPRT as "Buy", KAR as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for OPEN (target: $7) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, KAR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs EBAY's 1.08%.

MetricLQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.KAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.00$40.50$32.00$109.67$6.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1419186826
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises107
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.36$1.15
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.4%0.0%+1.6%+5.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — KAR and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCopart, Inc. (CPRT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.

(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?

On trailing P/E, OPENLANE, Inc.

(KAR) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?

Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.

(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +527. 2% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 494% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.

(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPENLANE, Inc. grew EPS 264. 4% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?

Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.

(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPEN: 22. 2% to $6. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?

In this comparison, KAR (1.

3% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LQDT, CPRT, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.

(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LQDT and CPRT and KAR and EBAY and OPEN?

These companies operate in different sectors (LQDT (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRT (Industrials) and KAR (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KAR, EBAY pay a dividend while LQDT, CPRT, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LQDT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CPRT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KAR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EBAY

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OPEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LQDT and CPRT and KAR and EBAY and OPEN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LQDT: 3.7% · CPRT: -3.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(LQDT: 6.3% · CPRT: 33.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LQDT: 41.7x · CPRT: 21.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.