Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Real Estate - Services
LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Business Services | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $32.77B | $2.91B | $48.63B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $480M | $4.61B | $1.93B | $11.60B | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $1.56B | $178M | $2.04B | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 45.3% | 46.2% | 72.0% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 36.5% | 10.2% | 19.6% | -9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 24.3x | 21.5x | 19.3x | 17.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $14M | $104M | $1.42B | $7.38B | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $2.78B | $142M | $1.87B | $962M |
LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity Services,… (LQDT) | 100 | 608.2 | +508.2% |
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 162.7 | +62.7% |
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 207.2 | +107.2% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 202.9 | +102.9% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LQDT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 31.2%, EPS growth 38.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- 31.2% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
- Beta 0.52, current ratio 8.25x
- 33.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
KAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.3% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
EBAY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 19.3x)
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs CPRT's -44.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.2% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs CPRT's -44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 20.1% vs -15.8% |
LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 2 • LQDT leads 0 • KAR leads 0 • EBAY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 24.2x LQDT's $480M. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $480M | $4.6B | $1.9B | $11.6B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $1.9B | $288M | $2.6B | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $1.6B | $178M | $2.0B | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $1.4B | $337M | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +45.3% | +46.2% | +72.0% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +36.5% | +10.2% | +19.6% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +33.8% | +9.2% | +17.6% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +30.5% | +17.4% | +14.5% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | -3.6% | +0.5% | +19.5% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | -10.0% | +89.7% | +5.7% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, KAR trades at a 60% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KAR's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LQDT's 21.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $32.8B | $2.9B | $48.6B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $964M | $30.1B | $4.2B | $54.1B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.67x | 21.30x | 16.73x | 24.52x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.33x | 21.49x | 19.31x | 17.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.26x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.19x | 15.73x | 14.55x | 21.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 7.05x | 1.51x | 4.38x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 3.60x | 1.93x | 10.61x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.07x | 26.62x | 8.66x | 29.28x | 3.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +15.9% | +11.6% | +44.1% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +14.7% | +3.8% | +11.5% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +60.8% | +20.1% | +6.9% | +16.8% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +19.7% | +9.4% | +17.4% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.01x | 0.93x | 1.60x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$160M | -$2.7B | $1.3B | $5.5B | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $2.8B | $142M | $1.9B | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $104M | $1.4B | $7.4B | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 3.09x | 10.52x | -8.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs CPRT's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | -10.3% | -6.1% | +22.6% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | -44.7% | +43.1% | +54.2% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.1% | -14.7% | +82.3% | +137.4% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.8% | +8.8% | +61.6% | +86.3% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +508.2% | +527.2% | +99.2% | +369.5% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.0% | -5.2% | +22.2% | +33.4% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPRT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.52x | 0.98x | 0.73x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.83 | $63.85 | $31.78 | $111.38 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.67 | $32.20 | $19.02 | $67.87 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +53.0% | +86.3% | +95.5% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.6 | 47.5 | 40.9 | 63.1 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 7.8M | 976K | 5.4M | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KAR and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LQDT as "Buy", CPRT as "Buy", KAR as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for OPEN (target: $7) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, KAR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $40.50 | $32.00 | $109.67 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 19 | 18 | 68 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.36 | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
LQDT vs CPRT vs KAR vs EBAY vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?
On trailing P/E, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +527. 2% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 494% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPENLANE, Inc. grew EPS 264. 4% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPEN: 22. 2% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN?
In this comparison, KAR (1.
3% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LQDT, CPRT, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LQDT or CPRT or KAR or EBAY or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LQDT and CPRT and KAR and EBAY and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (LQDT (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRT (Industrials) and KAR (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KAR, EBAY pay a dividend while LQDT, CPRT, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.