Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $183K | $183M | $5.32B | $1.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $1.03B | $8.31B | $4.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $15M | $14M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 16.8% | 10.8% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | -19.3% | -5.9% | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.7x | 53.5x | 96.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $103M | $454M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $120M | $199M | $124M |
LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Co… (LRHC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 441.9 | +341.9% |
| eXp World Holdings,… (EXPI) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 118.7%, EPS growth -13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 118.7% FFO/revenue growth vs DOUG's 3.8%
DOUG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 56.2%, current ratio 1.63x
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 53.5x)
- 1.5% margin vs LRHC's -35.5%
- 3.2% ROA vs LRHC's -131.3%, ROIC -26.1% vs -83.2%
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +14.4% vs LRHC's -99.8%
EXPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 2.9%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs COMP's -56.6%
- Beta 1.57, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.53x
- Beta 1.57 vs LRHC's 2.86
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 118.7% FFO/revenue growth vs DOUG's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 53.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs LRHC's -35.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs LRHC's 2.86 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.4% vs LRHC's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs LRHC's -131.3%, ROIC -26.1% vs -83.2% |
LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOUG leads in 2 of 6 categories
LRHC leads 1 • COMP leads 1 • EXPI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOUG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 105.6x LRHC's $79M. DOUG is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LRHC's -35.5%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $1.0B | $8.3B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | -$52M | -$100M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $15M | $14M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$17M | $16M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +16.8% | +10.8% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.3% | -5.9% | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.5% | +1.5% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -1.7% | +0.2% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +0.9% | +99.4% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.0% | +10.7% | +133.3% | -24.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LRHC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183,029 | $183M | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $165M | $5.6B | $961M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 12.18x | -87.50x | -48.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.70x | 53.52x | 96.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 66.86x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.18x | 0.76x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 1.01x | 6.36x | 4.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 26.18x | 9.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOUG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOUG delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-176 for LRHC. DOUG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRHC's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOUG scores 4/9 vs LRHC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -175.7% | +10.3% | +1.1% | -9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -131.3% | +3.2% | +0.4% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -83.2% | -26.1% | -2.5% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -96.9% | -16.3% | -2.9% | -9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.56x | 0.58x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$17M | $255M | -$124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $120M | $199M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $103M | $454M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.63x | 4.53x | -0.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $5,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $36 for LRHC. Over the past 12 months, COMP leads with a +14.4% total return vs LRHC's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 49.1% vs LRHC's -84.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.3% | -9.2% | -16.7% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.8% | +13.7% | +14.4% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -23.3% | +231.4% | -44.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -80.0% | -48.3% | -72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -80.0% | -56.6% | +703.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.7% | -8.5% | +49.1% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOUG and EXPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXPI is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LRHC's 2.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOUG currently trades 64.7% from its 52-week high vs LRHC's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.86x | 1.82x | 1.79x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1866.00 | $3.20 | $13.96 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $1.53 | $5.66 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +64.7% | +62.7% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.2 | 62.1 | 65.7 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 734K | 14.5M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOUG as "Buy", COMP as "Buy", EXPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 63.2% for EXPI (target: $11). EXPI is the only dividend payer here at 2.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.29 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.2% |
DOUG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LRHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LRHC vs DOUG vs COMP vs EXPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, La Rosa Holdings Corp.
(LRHC) is the stronger pick with 118. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI?
On forward P/E, Douglas Elliman Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI?
Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) delivered a total return of -48. 3%, compared to -99. 6% for La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +703. 2% versus LRHC's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus La Rosa Holdings Corp. 's 2. 86β — meaning LRHC is approximately 82% more volatile than EXPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 72% for La Rosa Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), La Rosa Holdings Corp.
(LRHC) is pulling ahead at 118. 7% versus 3. 8% for Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Douglas Elliman Inc. grew EPS 118. 7% year-over-year, compared to -13. 6% for La Rosa Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRHC leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI?
Douglas Elliman Inc.
(DOUG) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -20. 8% for La Rosa Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COMP leads at -0. 4% versus -16. 1% for LRHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOUG leads at 16. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Douglas Elliman Inc.
(DOUG) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 96. 3x for eXp World Holdings, Inc. — 75. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI?
In this comparison, EXPI (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. LRHC, DOUG, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LRHC or DOUG or COMP or EXPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 9% yield, +703. 2% 10Y return). La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) carries a higher beta of 2. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPI: +703. 2%, LRHC: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LRHC and DOUG and COMP and EXPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LRHC (Real Estate) and DOUG (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and EXPI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LRHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOUG is a small-cap deep-value stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EXPI pays a dividend while LRHC, DOUG, COMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.