LSTR vs CHRW vs EXPD vs XPO

For growth investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (23. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 77. 4x. On forward P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +298. 9%, compared to +10. 6% for Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 2% versus CHRW's +163. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning XPO is approximately 129% more volatile than EXPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 25. 1% year-over-year, compared to -39. 9% for Landstar System, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPO leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 2. 4% for Landstar System, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPD leads at 9. 5% versus 3. 6% for LSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPD leads at 15. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 19x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) trades at 23. 6x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHRW: 9. 3% to $187. 38.

In this comparison, LSTR (2.

0% yield), CHRW (1. 4% yield), EXPD (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. XPO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +248. 1% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +248. 1%, XPO: +21. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LSTR, CHRW, EXPD pay a dividend while XPO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.