Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Trucking
Trucking
LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $6.18B | $547M | $20.33B | $2.72B | $41.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.77B | $2.46B | $16.20B | $4.04B | $5.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $125M | $-91M | $599M | $56M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 17.2% | 23.1% | 8.3% | 4.1% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 2.1% | 4.9% | 2.2% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 32.2x | — | 27.9x | 23.6x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $133M | $2.16B | $1.63B | $669M | $141M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $397M | $106M | $161M | $102M | $120M |
LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landstar System, In… (LSTR) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| C.H. Robinson World… (CHRW) | 100 | 211.2 | +111.2% |
| ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) | 100 | 543.9 | +443.9% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.75x
- 2.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ODFL's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth 88.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
- 0.8% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4%
CHRW is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.95 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
ARCB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +107.5% vs FWRD's +0.6%
ODFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs ARCB's 6.3%
- PEG 3.36 vs CHRW's 5.20
- 18.6% margin vs FWRD's -3.7%
- 18.5% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 23.6% vs 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.8% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs FWRD's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ODFL's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.5% vs FWRD's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 23.6% vs 1.2% |
LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARCB leads 1 • CHRW leads 1 • LSTR leads 0 • FWRD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 6.6x FWRD's $2.5B. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FWRD's -3.7%. On growth, ARCB holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.8B | $2.5B | $16.2B | $4.0B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $209M | $206M | $896M | $217M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $125M | -$91M | $599M | $56M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $239M | $38M | $858M | $169M | $955M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +23.1% | +8.3% | +4.1% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +2.1% | +4.9% | +2.2% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -3.7% | +3.7% | +1.4% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +1.6% | +5.3% | +4.2% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | -5.1% | -0.8% | +3.3% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.5% | +35.1% | +9.9% | -138.5% | -11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.5x trailing earnings, CHRW trades at a 35% valuation discount to LSTR's 55.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ODFL offers better value at 3.66x vs CHRW's 6.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.2B | $547M | $20.3B | $2.7B | $41.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $2.6B | $21.8B | $3.3B | $41.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.97x | -4.98x | 35.48x | 46.48x | 41.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.20x | — | 27.86x | 23.61x | 37.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.62x | — | 3.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.34x | 13.75x | 24.28x | 12.59x | 23.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 0.22x | 1.25x | 0.68x | 7.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.94x | 3.32x | 11.28x | 2.16x | 9.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.75x | 35.82x | 22.72x | 23.78x | 43.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRW delivers a 33.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHRW scores 7/9 vs ARCB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | -52.6% | +33.3% | +4.3% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | -3.3% | +11.5% | +2.3% | +18.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.1% | +1.2% | +18.0% | +3.9% | +23.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +1.5% | +25.6% | +5.1% | +27.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 13.36x | 0.88x | 0.52x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$263M | $2.1B | $1.5B | $567M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $397M | $106M | $161M | $102M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $133M | $2.2B | $1.6B | $669M | $141M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 79.62x | 0.32x | 6.27x | 6.58x | 4601.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHRW five years ago would be worth $18,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,978 for FWRD. Over the past 12 months, ARCB leads with a +107.5% total return vs FWRD's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHRW at 20.2% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.6% | -31.0% | +5.1% | +58.0% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.2% | +0.6% | +98.6% | +107.5% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -81.3% | +73.6% | +40.5% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.1% | -80.2% | +84.1% | +37.1% | +50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.2% | -47.3% | +163.6% | +627.8% | +841.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | -42.8% | +20.2% | +12.0% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LSTR and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHRW is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSTR currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs FWRD's 53.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 2.28x | 0.95x | 1.90x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $195.58 | $32.47 | $203.34 | $135.10 | $233.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $119.32 | $14.81 | $86.58 | $58.16 | $126.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +53.4% | +84.3% | +90.1% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 42.4 | 42.9 | 60.5 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 435K | 733K | 1.7M | 307K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LSTR and ODFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LSTR as "Hold", FWRD as "Hold", CHRW as "Hold", ARCB as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs -6.2% for LSTR (target: $171). For income investors, LSTR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.98% vs ARCB's 0.39%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $170.75 | $37.00 | $187.38 | $117.14 | $208.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 21 | 46 | 24 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | +1.4% | +0.4% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.59 | — | $2.48 | $0.48 | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +0.2% | +1.7% | +2.8% | +1.8% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LSTR vs FWRD vs CHRW vs ARCB vs ODFL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) is the stronger pick with 0.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL?
On trailing P/E, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the cheapest at 35. 5x versus Landstar System, Inc. at 55. 0x. On forward P/E, ArcBest Corporation is actually cheaper at 23. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. wins at 3. 36x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 20x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL?
Over the past 5 years, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) delivered a total return of +84. 1%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ODFL returned +841. 8% versus FWRD's -47. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 140% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) is pulling ahead at 0.
8% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -64. 1% for ArcBest Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRD leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for Forward Air Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus 1. 5% for FWRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 36x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) trades at 23. 6x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL?
In this comparison, LSTR (2.
0% yield), CHRW (1. 4% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield), ARCB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FWRD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LSTR or FWRD or CHRW or ARCB or ODFL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +841. 8% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +841. 8%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LSTR and FWRD and CHRW and ARCB and ODFL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LSTR, CHRW, ODFL pay a dividend while FWRD, ARCB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.