Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LUD
Luda Technology Group Limited

Steel

Basic MaterialsAMEX • HK
Market Cap$116M
5Y Perf.+42.9%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$356K
5Y Perf.-98.2%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+38.9%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-21.9%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.-23.7%

LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LUD logoLUD
RETO logoRETO
PESI logoPESI
CLPS logoCLPS
CWST logoCWST
IndustrySteelConstruction MaterialsWaste ManagementInformation Technology ServicesWaste Management
Market Cap$116M$356K$207M$25M$5.35B
Revenue (TTM)$45M$9M$59M$299M$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$-361K$-25M$-18M$-4M$7M
Gross Margin25.4%14.0%4.1%22.8%17.4%
Operating Margin1.0%-237.8%-26.3%-1.4%4.5%
Forward P/E63.9x
Total Debt$614K$110K$4M$34M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$671K$12M$28M$124M

LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LUD
RETO
PESI
CLPS
CWST
StockFeb 25May 26Return
Luda Technology Gro… (LUD)100142.9+42.9%
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1001.8-98.2%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100138.9+38.9%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10078.1-21.9%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)10076.3-23.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LUD and CWST are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CLPS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LUD
Luda Technology Group Limited
The Defensive Pick

LUD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 1.23x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.01 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage
  • +45.0% vs RETO's -95.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 178.6% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
  • 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
  • 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
  • 0.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
  • 0.2% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 2.6% vs -14.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWST logoCWST18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
ValueLUD logoLUDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCWST logoCWST0.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Stability / SafetyLUD logoLUDBeta 0.01 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LUD logoLUD+45.0% vs RETO's -95.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CWST logoCWST0.2% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 2.6% vs -14.5%

LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LUDLuda Technology Group Limited
FY 2024
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$322,619
RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLUDLAGGINGPESI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LUD and RETO and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 216.8x RETO's $9M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.4% (CWST) to -2.9% (RETO). On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLUD logoLUDLuda Technology G…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$45M$9M$59M$299M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M-$14M-$1M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$18M-$4M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$14M$0$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.4%+14.0%+4.1%+22.8%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.0%-2.4%-26.3%-1.4%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.8%-2.9%-30.1%-1.3%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.8%-77.8%-23.4%-2.3%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.0%-20.1%+15.3%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.8%-110.5%+75.8%-18.6%
Evenly matched — LUD and RETO and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LUD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LUD's 115.8x.

MetricLUD logoLUDLuda Technology G…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$116M$355,799$207M$25M$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$108M-$205,956$200M$31M$6.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-362.50x-0.04x-14.89x-3.48x712.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.63.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple115.84x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.59x0.19x3.36x0.15x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.31x0.01x4.11x0.43x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.49x63.17x
LUD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CWST leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CWST delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LUD scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLUD logoLUDLuda Technology G…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.5%-183.4%-34.5%-6.1%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.8%-75.1%-20.2%-3.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%-14.5%-21.7%-7.9%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%-21.6%-16.7%-9.8%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965524
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.00x0.09x0.59x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M-$561,755-$7M$6M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$671,355$12M$28M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$614,476$109,600$4M$34M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.82x-31.78x-42.14x1.12x
CWST leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LUD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, LUD leads with a +45.0% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUD at 13.2% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLUD logoLUDLuda Technology G…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.3%-66.1%-8.8%-10.3%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.0%-95.9%+26.2%-5.4%-28.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.0%-99.9%+21.7%+0.5%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.0%-100.0%+45.6%-69.3%+25.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.0%-100.0%+178.6%-78.5%+1059.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.2%-92.0%+6.8%+0.2%-2.2%
LUD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LUD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LUD is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLUD logoLUDLuda Technology G…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.01x1.77x1.85x0.27x0.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.20$19.55$16.50$1.88$121.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.90$0.48$8.02$0.80$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+24.0%+3.3%+67.7%+48.2%+70.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.743.541.549.852.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded126K920K164K15K874K
Evenly matched — LUD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs LUD's 2.59%.

MetricLUD logoLUDLuda Technology G…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$119.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.15$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LUD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CWST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallLuda Technology Group Limit… (LUD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 712. 1x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Luda Technology Group Limited (LUD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

01β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 13270% more volatile than LUD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 4% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.

1% to $18. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield), LUD (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Luda Technology Group Limited (LUD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

01), 2. 6% yield). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LUD: +45. 0%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between LUD and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST?

These companies operate in different sectors (LUD (Basic Materials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LUD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. LUD, CLPS pay a dividend while RETO, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LUD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LUD and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LUD: -12.8% · RETO: 49.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.