Steel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Waste Management
Information Technology Services
Waste Management
LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Construction Materials | Waste Management | Information Technology Services | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $116M | $356K | $207M | $25M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45M | $9M | $59M | $299M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-361K | $-25M | $-18M | $-4M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 14.0% | 4.1% | 22.8% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | -237.8% | -26.3% | -1.4% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $614K | $110K | $4M | $34M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $671K | $12M | $28M | $124M |
LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luda Technology Gro… (LUD) | 100 | 142.9 | +42.9% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 76.3 | -23.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LUD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 1.23x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.01 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage
- +45.0% vs RETO's -95.9%
RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
CLPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
- 0.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
- 0.2% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 2.6% vs -14.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.0% vs RETO's -95.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 2.6% vs -14.5% |
LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LUD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CWST leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • RETO leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LUD and RETO and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 216.8x RETO's $9M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.4% (CWST) to -2.9% (RETO). On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45M | $9M | $59M | $299M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$19M | -$14M | -$1M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25M | -$18M | -$4M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$7M | -$14M | $0 | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +14.0% | +4.1% | +22.8% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | -2.4% | -26.3% | -1.4% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -2.9% | -30.1% | -1.3% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -77.8% | -23.4% | -2.3% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +49.0% | -20.1% | +15.3% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +98.8% | -110.5% | +75.8% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LUD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LUD's 115.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116M | $355,799 | $207M | $25M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $108M | -$205,956 | $200M | $31M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -362.50x | -0.04x | -14.89x | -3.48x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 115.84x | — | — | — | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 0.19x | 3.36x | 0.15x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.31x | 0.01x | 4.11x | 0.43x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.49x | — | — | — | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LUD scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -183.4% | -34.5% | -6.1% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | -75.1% | -20.2% | -3.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | -14.5% | -21.7% | -7.9% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | -21.6% | -16.7% | -9.8% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.09x | 0.59x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$561,755 | -$7M | $6M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $671,355 | $12M | $28M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $614,476 | $109,600 | $4M | $34M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | -31.78x | -42.14x | — | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, LUD leads with a +45.0% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUD at 13.2% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.3% | -66.1% | -8.8% | -10.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.0% | -95.9% | +26.2% | -5.4% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | -99.9% | +21.7% | +0.5% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | -100.0% | +45.6% | -69.3% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | -100.0% | +178.6% | -78.5% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | -92.0% | +6.8% | +0.2% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LUD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LUD is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 1.77x | 1.85x | 0.27x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.20 | $19.55 | $16.50 | $1.88 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.90 | $0.48 | $8.02 | $0.80 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.0% | +3.3% | +67.7% | +48.2% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 43.5 | 41.5 | 49.8 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 126K | 920K | 164K | 15K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs LUD's 2.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | — | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | — | — | +14.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.15 | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LUD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CWST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LUD vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 712. 1x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Luda Technology Group Limited (LUD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 13270% more volatile than LUD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 4% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), LUD (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LUD or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Luda Technology Group Limited (LUD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 2. 6% yield). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LUD: +45. 0%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LUD and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST?
These companies operate in different sectors (LUD (Basic Materials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LUD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. LUD, CLPS pay a dividend while RETO, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.