Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Internet Content & Information | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $35.69B | $1.17B | $11.14B | $12.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.74B | $669M | $7.29B | $6.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.84B | $-112M | $425M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 22.9% | 28.5% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.6% | -18.1% | 15.7% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 52.4x | 20.8x | 99.1x |
| Total Debt | $16.14B | $30M | $12.29B | $1.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.84B | $281M | $1.46B | $1.60B |
LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas Sands Cor… (LVS) | 100 | 111.9 | +11.9% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 47.4 | -52.6% |
| Wynn Resorts, Limit… (WYNN) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LVS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 2.2%
- 52.5% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.09, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.14x
GENI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 31.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1%
WYNN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs GENI's -16.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs GENI's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WYNN's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.7% vs GENI's -53.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs GENI's -11.1%, ROIC 16.9% vs -16.6% |
LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LVS leads in 1 of 6 categories
GENI leads 0 • WYNN leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LVS and DKNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LVS is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.7B annually — 20.5x GENI's $669M. LVS is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -16.7%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.7B | $669M | $7.3B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.9B | -$50M | $1.8B | $266M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | -$112M | $425M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | $37M | $872M | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +22.9% | +28.5% | +41.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | -18.1% | +15.7% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -16.7% | +5.8% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +5.5% | +12.0% | +10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.3% | +37.0% | +9.2% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.5% | +33.8% | +50.7% | +192.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LVS and WYNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, LVS trades at a 33% valuation discount to WYNN's 34.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LVS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35.7B | $1.2B | $11.1B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48.0B | $924M | $22.0B | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.89x | -10.83x | 34.03x | -3113.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.20x | 52.42x | 20.79x | 99.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.37x | — | 12.36x | 49.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.74x | 1.75x | 1.56x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.27x | 1.68x | — | 19.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.58x | 18.18x | 16.10x | 19.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LVS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LVS delivers a 95.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $-16 for GENI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LVS's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LVS scores 7/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +95.8% | -15.5% | — | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | -11.1% | +3.3% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | -16.6% | +9.3% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.0% | -15.3% | +9.9% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.34x | 0.04x | — | 3.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.3B | -$250M | $10.8B | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $281M | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.1B | $30M | $12.3B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.25x | -136.57x | 2.82x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LVS and GENI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LVS five years ago would be worth $9,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,536 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, LVS leads with a +38.7% total return vs GENI's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 5.5% vs LVS's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.6% | -55.8% | -12.6% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.7% | -53.1% | +28.2% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.0% | +17.4% | -2.6% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | -74.6% | -13.0% | -47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.5% | -52.4% | +34.8% | +157.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.1% | +5.5% | -0.9% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LVS and WYNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LVS is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GENI's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WYNN currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs GENI's 34.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.50x | 1.23x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.45 | $13.73 | $134.72 | $48.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.91 | $3.83 | $82.20 | $20.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.3% | +34.7% | +79.3% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 45.3 | 55.4 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 5.6M | 1.6M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LVS and WYNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LVS as "Buy", GENI as "Buy", WYNN as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs 29.6% for LVS (target: $70). For income investors, LVS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.24% vs WYNN's 1.57%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.70 | $12.10 | $143.00 | $36.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 19 | 45 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.20 | — | $1.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +6.6% |
LVS leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.
LVS vs GENI vs WYNN vs DKNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG?
On trailing P/E, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the cheapest at 22. 9x versus Wynn Resorts, Limited at 34. 0x. On forward P/E, Las Vegas Sands Corp. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) delivered a total return of -1. 9%, compared to -74. 6% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +157. 3% versus GENI's -52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 50β — meaning GENI is approximately 37% more volatile than LVS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 8% for Las Vegas Sands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -63. 0% for Genius Sports Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, LVS leads at 46. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG?
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LVS leads at 23. 7% versus -15. 6% for GENI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKNG leads at 41. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 82. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG?
In this comparison, LVS (2.
2% yield), WYNN (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GENI, DKNG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LVS or GENI or WYNN or DKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 2. 2% yield). Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LVS: +52. 5%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LVS and GENI and WYNN and DKNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (LVS (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services) and WYNN (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LVS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; WYNN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LVS, WYNN pay a dividend while GENI, DKNG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 18%
- Gross Margin > 13%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.