Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1M | $8.97B | $771M | $760M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $4.99B | $2.66B | $5.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-151M | $367M | $171M | $-374M |
| Gross Margin | 1.9% | 55.1% | 54.4% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | -160.6% | 9.0% | 2.7% | -9.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.2x | 18.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $132M | $804M | $333M | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $221M | $1.61B | $1.77B | $1.32B |
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixiang Education H… (LXEH) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 17.2 | -82.8% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXEH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 1.1%
- 47.3% 10Y total return vs TAL's 27.3%
- Better valuation composite
- 7.4% margin vs LXEH's -179.3%
TAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 8.9%, current ratio 2.86x
- Beta 0.96, current ratio 2.86x
- +23.9% vs LXEH's -96.1%
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs LXEH's -179.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs GOTU's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs LXEH's -96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs LXEH's -31.3%, ROIC 9.9% vs -60.7% |
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EDU leads in 2 of 6 categories
TAL leads 1 • LXEH leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EDU and TAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 69.3x LXEH's $84M. EDU is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LXEH's -179.3%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $5.0B | $2.7B | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | $563M | $72M | -$378M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$151M | $367M | $171M | -$374M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$61M | $737M | $441M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +55.1% | +54.4% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -160.6% | +9.0% | +2.7% | -9.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -179.3% | +7.4% | +6.5% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -72.7% | +14.8% | +16.6% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +6.1% | +38.7% | +32.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +87.0% | 0.0% | -21.4% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LXEH and TAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 63% valuation discount to EDU's 24.5x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $9.0B | $771M | $760M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $8.2B | -$667M | $638M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 24.50x | 9.05x | -4.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.25x | 18.12x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.25x | -16.38x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.83x | 0.34x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 2.31x | 0.20x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.07x | 2.70x | 64.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LXEH. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXEH's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs LXEH's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.5% | +9.1% | +4.7% | -21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | +4.8% | +3.1% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.7% | +9.9% | -0.3% | -47.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | +9.5% | -0.2% | -39.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 0.20x | 0.09x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$89M | -$809M | -$1.6B | -$829M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $221M | $1.6B | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132M | $804M | $333M | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.28x | 1570.90x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EDU five years ago would be worth $3,854 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for LXEH. Over the past 12 months, TAL leads with a +23.9% total return vs LXEH's -96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 26.7% vs LXEH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.0% | -2.5% | -0.8% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.1% | +19.4% | +23.9% | -39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +37.2% | +103.2% | -32.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -61.5% | -79.7% | -92.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +47.3% | +27.3% | -81.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | +11.1% | +26.7% | -12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LXEH and EDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LXEH is the less volatile stock with a -0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOTU's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDU currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs LXEH's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.92x | 0.82x | 0.96x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.00 | $64.97 | $13.37 | $4.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $41.62 | $9.04 | $1.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.6% | +86.7% | +85.3% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 54.8 | 52.3 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 689K | 3.3M | 395K |
Analyst Outlook
EDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EDU as "Buy", TAL as "Hold", GOTU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for TAL (target: $18) vs 20.7% for EDU (target: $68). EDU is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.00 | $18.00 | $2.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 28 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | +1.7% | +4.0% |
EDU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). TAL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU?
On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.
0x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU?
Over the past 5 years, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) delivered a total return of -61. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDU returned +47. 3% versus LXEH's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 92β versus Gaotu Techedu Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning GOTU is approximately -207% more volatile than LXEH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 90% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU?
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -75. 1% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDU leads at 8. 7% versus -79. 1% for LXEH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU?
In this comparison, EDU (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LXEH, TAL, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXEH: -99. 8%, GOTU: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LXEH and EDU and TAL and GOTU?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LXEH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock. EDU pays a dividend while LXEH, TAL, GOTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.