Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $320M | $2.57B | $10.41B | $398M | $5.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $669M | $3.24B | $0.00 | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-105M | $-609M | $269M | $-223M | $-569M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.6% | 75.9% | — | -41.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -83.9% | 13.8% | — | -134.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $1.28B | $643M | $25M | $395M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $434M | $1.31B | $78M | $355M |
LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexeo Therapeutics,… (LXEO) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 59.4 | -40.6% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 15.6 | -84.4% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 82.2 | -17.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXEO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +94.6% vs RCKT's -45.2%
RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
BMRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.65
- -35.6% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 272.0%
- 8.3% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- Beta 0.65 vs LXEO's 1.98
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 6.38x
Among these 5 stocks, CRSP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs LXEO's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.6% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs LXEO's -70.9%, ROIC 7.4% vs -166.2% |
LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMRN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRSP leads 1 • LXEO leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMRN and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMRN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $669M | $3.2B | $0 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$536M | $521M | -$232M | -$535M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$105M | -$609M | $269M | -$223M | -$569M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$107M | -$487M | $767M | -$190M | -$401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.6% | +75.9% | — | -41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -83.9% | +13.8% | — | -134.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -91.0% | +8.3% | — | -138.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -72.8% | +23.7% | — | -97.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% | +2.8% | — | +68.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.9% | -17.2% | -43.2% | +38.7% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BMRN and RCKT and CRSP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $320M | $2.6B | $10.4B | $398M | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $295M | $3.4B | $9.7B | $345M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.88x | -4.48x | 30.07x | -1.83x | -8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.65x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.89x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.82x | 3.23x | — | 1440.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | — | 1.75x | 1.47x | 2.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.36x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRN delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. LXEO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRSP's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMRN scores 5/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -90.5% | -6.1% | +4.4% | -80.5% | -30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.9% | -45.8% | +3.4% | -67.5% | -24.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -166.2% | -89.4% | +7.4% | -63.2% | -22.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -85.8% | -46.4% | +8.1% | -58.9% | -26.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | — | 0.11x | 0.09x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $842M | -$669M | -$53M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $434M | $1.3B | $78M | $355M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $1.3B | $643M | $25M | $395M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -754.06x | -14.49x | 16.96x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BMRN five years ago would be worth $6,959 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, LXEO leads with a +94.6% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRSP at -2.2% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.4% | +10.7% | -9.0% | +6.1% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.6% | -21.8% | -8.8% | -45.2% | +53.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | -44.5% | -43.6% | -82.8% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | -77.2% | -30.4% | -91.6% | -51.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | -59.4% | -35.6% | -91.3% | +272.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | -17.8% | -17.4% | -44.4% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BMRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LXEO's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMRN currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 1.36x | 0.64x | 1.21x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.99 | $42.37 | $66.28 | $7.39 | $78.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.43 | $18.29 | $50.76 | $2.19 | $33.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +61.7% | +81.7% | +49.7% | +66.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 66.6 | 48.7 | 54.4 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 872K | 1.8M | 1.8M | 3.5M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LXEO as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 217.9% upside for LXEO (target: $19) vs 20.2% for CRSP (target: $63).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $48.36 | $91.50 | $5.00 | $63.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 33 | 41 | 19 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BMRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRSP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LXEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs RCKT vs CRSP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (LXEO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP?
Over the past 5 years, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) delivered a total return of -30. 4%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +289. 1% versus RCKT's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 90β — meaning LXEO is approximately 199% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (LXEO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 21% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP?
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMRN leads at 16. 6% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LXEO: 217.
9% to $18. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LXEO or RARE or BMRN or RCKT or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (LXEO) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMRN: -35. 6%, LXEO: -42. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LXEO and RARE and BMRN and RCKT and CRSP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LXEO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.