Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.51B
5Y Perf.-65.1%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$157.92B
5Y Perf.+101.9%
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$15.06B
5Y Perf.-70.2%
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+291.8%

LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LYFT logoLYFT
UBER logoUBER
GRAB logoGRAB
BIRD logoBIRD
HIMS logoHIMS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationApparel - RetailMedical - Equipment & Services
Market Cap$5.51B$157.92B$15.06B$35M$6.63B
Revenue (TTM)$6.52B$53.69B$3.55B$161M$2.35B
Net Income (TTM)$2.86B$8.54B$379M$-83M$128M
Gross Margin43.2%41.0%43.5%38.8%69.7%
Operating Margin-2.5%11.7%5.7%-52.9%4.6%
Forward P/E23.8x22.8x34.6x51.5x
Total Debt$1.28B$13.47B$2.05B$54M$1.12B
Cash & Equiv.$1.13B$7.74B$3.43B$67M$229M

LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LYFT
UBER
GRAB
BIRD
HIMS
StockNov 21May 26Return
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10034.9-65.1%
Uber Technologies, … (UBER)100201.9+101.9%
Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB)10029.8-70.2%
Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD)1001.6-98.4%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100391.8+291.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LYFT and UBER are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Uber Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BIRD and HIMS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

LYFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 43.8% margin vs BIRD's -51.9%
  • 39.1% ROA vs BIRD's -56.3%, ROIC -6.1% vs -61.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

UBER is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.09
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
  • Beta 1.09, current ratio 1.14x
  • Lower P/E (22.8x vs 51.5x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited
The Growth Play

GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
Best for: growth exposure
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BIRD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +14.1% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Best for: momentum
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 161.9% 10Y total return vs UBER's 84.6%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs BIRD's -25.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs BIRD's -25.3%
ValueUBER logoUBERLower P/E (22.8x vs 51.5x)
Quality / MarginsLYFT logoLYFT43.8% margin vs BIRD's -51.9%
Stability / SafetyUBER logoUBERBeta 1.09 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BIRD logoBIRD+14.1% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Efficiency (ROA)LYFT logoLYFT39.1% ROA vs BIRD's -56.3%, ROIC -6.1% vs -61.7%

LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UBERUber Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobility
57.0%$29.7B
Delivery
33.2%$17.2B
Freight
9.8%$5.1B
GRABGrab Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Deliveries
53.5%$1.8B
Mobility
36.2%$1.2B
Financial Services
10.3%$347M
BIRDAllbirds, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$190M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUBERLAGGINGGRAB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — UBER and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 334.2x BIRD's $161M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIRD's -51.9%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.5B$53.7B$3.6B$161M$2.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$63M$7.0B$395M-$77M$164M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.9B$8.5B$379M-$83M$128M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.2B$9.8B-$88M-$66M$73M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+43.2%+41.0%+43.5%+38.8%+69.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.5%+11.7%+5.7%-52.9%+4.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+43.8%+15.9%+10.7%-51.9%+5.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.7%+18.3%-2.5%-41.0%+3.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.8%+14.5%+23.5%-23.3%+28.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-84.3%+2.1%+7.1%-27.3%
Evenly matched — UBER and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BIRD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 97% valuation discount to GRAB's 59.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 25.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.

MetricLYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
Market CapShares × price$5.5B$157.9B$15.1B$35M$6.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.7B$163.7B$13.7B$22M$7.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.08x16.22x59.50x-0.52x50.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.75x22.78x34.64x51.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.93x36.09x42.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x3.04x4.47x0.19x2.82x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.81x5.79x2.36x0.48x12.25x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.94x16.18x112.36x89.61x
BIRD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-108 for BIRD. GRAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+150.2%+32.0%+5.8%-108.4%+23.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+39.1%+14.2%+3.3%-56.3%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.1%+13.6%+3.3%-61.7%+10.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.2%+12.5%+2.9%-45.9%+10.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947454
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.39x0.48x0.30x0.53x2.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$145M$5.7B-$1.4B-$13M$892M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$7.7B$3.4B$67M$229M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.3B$13.5B$2.1B$54M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.75x11.51x2.96x-224.86x
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $108 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, BIRD leads with a +14.1% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs BIRD's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-28.4%-7.4%-25.4%+51.0%-23.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.5%-8.3%-21.7%+14.1%-51.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.8%+97.6%+13.5%-76.7%+116.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.7%+63.2%-67.5%-98.9%+137.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.9%+84.6%-68.1%-98.9%+161.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.4%+25.5%+4.3%-38.5%+29.4%
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 25.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x1.09x1.42x2.04x2.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.54$101.99$6.62$24.31$70.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.31$68.46$3.48$2.15$13.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.4%+75.2%+57.3%+25.6%+36.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.062.346.649.854.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded15.2M15.9M48.1M7.1M34.9M
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30).

MetricLYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.21$104.88$6.70$29.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts59611219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.1%+4.1%+1.8%0.0%+1.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UBER leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BIRD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallUber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 3% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 59. 5x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -98. 9% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus BIRD's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 121% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -25. 3% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -49. 2% for Allbirds, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -51. 4% for BIRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) trades at 22. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 28. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +84. 6%, BIRD: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LYFT and UBER and GRAB and BIRD and HIMS?

These companies operate in different sectors (LYFT (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and GRAB (Technology) and BIRD (Consumer Cyclical) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LYFT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UBER

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GRAB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BIRD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LYFT and UBER and GRAB and BIRD and HIMS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LYFT: 13.8% · UBER: 14.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(LYFT: 43.8% · UBER: 15.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LYFT: 2.1x · UBER: 16.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.