Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Apparel - Retail
Medical - Equipment & Services
LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Apparel - Retail | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $5.51B | $157.92B | $15.06B | $35M | $6.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.52B | $53.69B | $3.55B | $161M | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.86B | $8.54B | $379M | $-83M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 41.0% | 43.5% | 38.8% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 11.7% | 5.7% | -52.9% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 23.8x | 22.8x | 34.6x | — | 51.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $13.47B | $2.05B | $54M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.13B | $7.74B | $3.43B | $67M | $229M |
LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 391.8 | +291.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LYFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 43.8% margin vs BIRD's -51.9%
- 39.1% ROA vs BIRD's -56.3%, ROIC -6.1% vs -61.7%
UBER is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.09
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (22.8x vs 51.5x)
GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
BIRD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +14.1% vs HIMS's -51.0%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs UBER's 84.6%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs BIRD's -25.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs BIRD's -25.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.8x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs BIRD's -51.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.1% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.1% ROA vs BIRD's -56.3%, ROIC -6.1% vs -61.7% |
LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UBER leads in 2 of 6 categories
BIRD leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • LYFT leads 0 • GRAB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UBER and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 334.2x BIRD's $161M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIRD's -51.9%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.5B | $53.7B | $3.6B | $161M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$63M | $7.0B | $395M | -$77M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $8.5B | $379M | -$83M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $9.8B | -$88M | -$66M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +41.0% | +43.5% | +38.8% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +11.7% | +5.7% | -52.9% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +15.9% | +10.7% | -51.9% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +18.3% | -2.5% | -41.0% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +14.5% | +23.5% | -23.3% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -84.3% | +2.1% | +7.1% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BIRD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 97% valuation discount to GRAB's 59.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 25.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $157.9B | $15.1B | $35M | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $163.7B | $13.7B | $22M | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.08x | 16.22x | 59.50x | -0.52x | 50.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.75x | 22.78x | 34.64x | — | 51.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.93x | 36.09x | — | 42.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 3.04x | 4.47x | 0.19x | 2.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 5.79x | 2.36x | 0.48x | 12.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.94x | 16.18x | 112.36x | — | 89.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-108 for BIRD. GRAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +150.2% | +32.0% | +5.8% | -108.4% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +39.1% | +14.2% | +3.3% | -56.3% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.1% | +13.6% | +3.3% | -61.7% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +12.5% | +2.9% | -45.9% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.48x | 0.30x | 0.53x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $145M | $5.7B | -$1.4B | -$13M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $7.7B | $3.4B | $67M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $13.5B | $2.1B | $54M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.75x | 11.51x | 2.96x | -224.86x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $108 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, BIRD leads with a +14.1% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs BIRD's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.4% | -7.4% | -25.4% | +51.0% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.5% | -8.3% | -21.7% | +14.1% | -51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.8% | +97.6% | +13.5% | -76.7% | +116.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | +63.2% | -67.5% | -98.9% | +137.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +84.6% | -68.1% | -98.9% | +161.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.4% | +25.5% | +4.3% | -38.5% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 25.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.09x | 1.42x | 2.04x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.54 | $101.99 | $6.62 | $24.31 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.31 | $68.46 | $3.48 | $2.15 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.4% | +75.2% | +57.3% | +25.6% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 62.3 | 46.6 | 49.8 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.2M | 15.9M | 48.1M | 7.1M | 34.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.21 | $104.88 | $6.70 | — | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 59 | 61 | 12 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.1% | +4.1% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
UBER leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BIRD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LYFT vs UBER vs GRAB vs BIRD vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 3% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 59. 5x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -98. 9% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus BIRD's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 121% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -25. 3% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -49. 2% for Allbirds, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -51. 4% for BIRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) trades at 22. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 28. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LYFT or UBER or GRAB or BIRD or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +84. 6%, BIRD: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LYFT and UBER and GRAB and BIRD and HIMS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LYFT (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and GRAB (Technology) and BIRD (Consumer Cyclical) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.