Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Consumer Electronics
LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $38.65B | $374.00B | $192.60B | $67.98B | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.61B | $45.18B | $97.26B | $37.21B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-2.15B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 41.5% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 29.5% | 15.5% | -4.0% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 115.8x | 24.8x | 16.5x | 93.5x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $12.44B | $14.46B | $44.88B | $32.57B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.11B | $9.03B | $5.70B | $4.57B | $35.93B |
LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 338.3 | +238.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, LYV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NFLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- PEG 0.75 vs AAPL's 1.89
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
DIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 0.9%
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 33.8x)
- 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6%
AAPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- 27.2% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- 34.0% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 67.4% vs 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 33.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AAPL's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 67.4% vs 1.5% |
LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
AAPL leads 1 • LYV leads 0 • NFLX leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 17.6x LYV's $25.6B. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.6B | $45.2B | $97.3B | $37.2B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $30.1B | $20.5B | $7.5B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$2.2B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $9.5B | $7.1B | $2.3B | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +41.5% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +29.5% | +15.5% | -4.0% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -5.8% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +6.2% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +17.6% | +6.5% | -1.0% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -5.5% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 83% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.6B | $374.0B | $192.6B | $68.0B | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.0B | $379.4B | $231.8B | $96.0B | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -692.98x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 93.52x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 115.80x | 24.80x | 16.53x | — | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.89x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 13.73x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 1.82x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.20x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 1.85x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.84x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 22.02x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs LYV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.4% | +41.3% | +9.8% | -5.9% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -2.2% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.7% | +29.8% | +6.9% | +1.5% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +1.5% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.84x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.88x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $5.4B | $39.2B | $28.0B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.1B | $9.0B | $5.7B | $4.6B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.4B | $14.5B | $44.9B | $32.6B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.68x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 3.56x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,017 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs DIS's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -4.9% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.0% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +216.8% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.7% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +101.5% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.0% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -27.8% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +622.5% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -3.7% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +26.3% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.90x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.25 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $30.00 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $125.34 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $8.06 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +90.4% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 48.9 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 44.0M | 9.1M | 22.2M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DIS and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYV as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 8.8% for LYV (target: $181). For income investors, DIS offers the higher dividend yield at 0.92% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $181.00 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $29.94 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 99 | 63 | 32 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
DIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AAPL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
LYV vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -39. 8% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Apple Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning AAPL is approximately 153% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYV leads at 14. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 99. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. LYV, NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LYV or NFLX or DIS or WBD or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LYV and NFLX and DIS and WBD and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (LYV (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and WBD (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. DIS pays a dividend while LYV, NFLX, WBD, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.