Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $948K | $8M | $3.13T | $19.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $823M | $115M | $318.27B | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-53M | $125.22B | $-289M |
| Gross Margin | 4.2% | 64.3% | 68.3% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -44.2% | 46.8% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | — | 25.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $35M | $46M | $112.18B | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $847K | $30.24B | $87M |
LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LZ Technology Holdi… (LZMH) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 80.8 | -19.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LZMH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.6%, EPS growth 188.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 116.5%
- 44.6% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
- Better valuation composite
AIXI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
BBAI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +36.7% vs LZMH's -99.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.6% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs LZMH's -99.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs -34.4% |
LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories
LZMH leads 1 • BBAI leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 2779.6x AIXI's $115M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $823M | $115M | $318.3B | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$49M | $192.6B | -$75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$53M | $125.2B | -$289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | $72.9B | -$56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +64.3% | +68.3% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -44.2% | +46.8% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -45.9% | +39.3% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -2.0% | +22.9% | -44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -64.9% | +18.3% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -29.9% | +23.4% | +52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LZMH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.2x trailing earnings, LZMH trades at a 96% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LZMH's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSFT's 19.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $947,541 | $8M | $3.13T | $19.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $53M | $3.21T | $19.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.16x | -0.45x | 30.86x | -5.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.34x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.04x | — | 19.72x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.11x | 11.10x | 154.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.10x | — | 9.15x | 24.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.49x | — | 43.66x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LZMH's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LZMH scores 6/9 vs BBAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | — | +33.1% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -65.3% | +19.2% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | -34.4% | +24.9% | -19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | -3.4% | +29.7% | -19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | — | 0.33x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $45M | $81.9B | -$63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $846,593 | $30.2B | $87M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $46M | $112.2B | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | -14.13x | 55.65x | -18.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBAI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +36.7% total return vs LZMH's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.3% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.2% | +68.1% | -10.8% | -28.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | -79.2% | -2.1% | +36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -98.6% | +39.5% | +49.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -98.6% | +72.5% | -56.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -98.6% | +787.7% | -57.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.3% | -75.9% | +11.7% | +14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LZMH and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LZMH is the less volatile stock with a -0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs LZMH's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.99x | 0.94x | 0.89x | 3.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.10 | $4.02 | $555.45 | $9.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.09 | $0.08 | $356.28 | $2.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +18.0% | +75.8% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.3 | 49.3 | 54.0 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 60.6M | 32.5M | 34.6M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSFT as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 31.1% for MSFT (target: $552). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $551.75 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 81 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 19 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LZMH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LZMH vs AIXI vs MSFT vs BBAI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the stronger pick with 44.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 81 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI?
On trailing P/E, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the cheapest at 1.
2x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
99β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately -434% more volatile than LZMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 52% for LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is pulling ahead at 44.
6% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares grew EPS 188. 9% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LZMH leads at 116. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.
9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LZMH, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LZMH or AIXI or MSFT or BBAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
99)). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LZMH: -98. 1%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LZMH and AIXI and MSFT and BBAI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LZMH is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while LZMH, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.