Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $8.50B | $2.11B | $559.27B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $586M | $64.08B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $217M | $-22M | $16.21B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 60.1% | 66.4% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | -0.8% | 30.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 26.8x | 19.6x | 26.0x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $112M | $237M | $104.10B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $329M | $121M | $10.79B | $86.81B |
MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 149.9 | +49.9% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 350.8 | +250.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MANH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 35.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 1.10 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage
NCNO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 13.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.4%
- 13.5% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 26.0x)
ORCL is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 25.3% margin vs NCNO's -3.7%
- 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ORCL's 425.1%
- PEG 1.24 vs ORCL's 3.66
- +43.7% vs NCNO's -22.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 26.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs NCNO's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs NCNO's -22.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs NCNO's -1.4%, ROIC 236.8% vs -1.2% |
MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
NCNO leads 1 • MANH leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1266.5x NCNO's $586M. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCNO's -3.7%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $586M | $64.1B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $27M | $26.5B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $217M | -$22M | $16.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $380M | $60M | -$24.7B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +60.1% | +66.4% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | -0.8% | +30.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | -3.7% | +25.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +10.2% | -38.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +9.6% | +21.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +2.3% | +24.5% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NCNO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 16% valuation discount to ORCL's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.5B | $2.1B | $559.3B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $2.2B | $652.6B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.88x | -53.88x | 44.82x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.79x | 19.64x | 25.99x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.86x | — | 6.31x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.67x | 121.97x | 27.36x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.86x | 3.89x | 9.74x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.85x | 1.87x | 26.59x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.74x | 39.45x | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NCNO. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs NCNO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +78.2% | -2.1% | +56.3% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +28.0% | -1.4% | +8.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | -1.2% | +12.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +76.3% | -1.5% | +14.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.22x | 4.96x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$216M | $116M | $93.3B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $329M | $121M | $10.8B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $112M | $237M | $104.1B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.51x | 5.44x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs NCNO's -22.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs NCNO's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | -27.9% | -0.1% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.9% | -22.1% | +31.6% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.3% | -21.0% | +106.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | -68.6% | +151.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.1% | -80.6% | +425.1% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.4% | -7.6% | +27.3% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MANH and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MANH is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs NCNO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.18x | 1.59x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $247.22 | $33.92 | $345.72 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $119.06 | $13.80 | $134.57 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.1% | +52.4% | +56.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 50.1 | 68.5 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 678K | 2.7M | 26.3M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ORCL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MANH as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $197.25 | $32.33 | $257.19 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 23 | 86 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 18 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.65 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). NCNO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MANH vs NCNO vs ORCL vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Oracle Corporation at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, nCino, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 44% more volatile than MANH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCNO leads at 25. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -7. 0% for nCino, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -3. 4% for NCNO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN?
In this comparison, ORCL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MANH, NCNO, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MANH or NCNO or ORCL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +425. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORCL: +425. 1%, NCNO: -80. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MANH and NCNO and ORCL and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (MANH (Technology) and NCNO (Technology) and ORCL (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ORCL pays a dividend while MANH, NCNO, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.