Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $3.30B | $36.50B | $3.15B | $20.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $655M | $5.06B | $1.16B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $385M | $42M | $449M |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | 34.5% | 31.5% | -18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 20.0% | 10.1% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.1x | 56.8x | 57.5x |
| Total Debt | $645M | $4.06B | $1.20B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $831M | $43M | $1.05B |
MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester United p… (MANU) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 405.3 | +305.3% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 274.4 | +174.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MANU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.92
TKO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 418.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.64, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.26x
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +83.6% vs FWONK's -0.1%
FWONK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 43.8% margin vs MANU's -1.4%
- Beta 0.35 vs MSGE's 0.94
- 42.6% ROA vs MANU's -0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.1x vs 56.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MANU's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs MSGE's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs FWONK's -0.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs MANU's -0.5% |
MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSGE leads in 2 of 6 categories
MANU leads 0 • TKO leads 0 • FWONK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MANU and TKO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 7.7x MANU's $655M. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MANU's -1.4%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $655M | $5.1B | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | $1.5B | $245M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $385M | $42M | $449M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $1.8B | $289M | $279M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.8% | +34.5% | +31.5% | -18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +20.0% | +10.1% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +7.6% | +3.6% | +43.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | +35.0% | +25.0% | +27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +25.9% | +59.4% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +62.3% | -123.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MANU and TKO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 83.0x trailing earnings, TKO trades at a 4% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MANU's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TKO's 27.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $36.5B | $3.2B | $20.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $39.7B | $4.3B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -74.04x | 82.98x | 86.64x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.12x | 56.83x | 57.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 69.62x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.41x | 27.47x | 23.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.64x | 7.71x | 3.35x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.53x | 3.93x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 86.79x | 31.50x | 33.88x | 22.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MANU. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | +4.1% | +7.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +2.5% | +1.8% | +42.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +6.1% | +8.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +7.5% | +11.0% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.33x | 0.44x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $559M | $3.2B | $1.2B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $831M | $43M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $645M | $4.1B | $1.2B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 6.00x | 4.43x | 3.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $35,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,384 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs FWONK's -0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.9% vs MANU's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | -9.0% | +22.8% | -4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | +12.1% | +83.6% | -0.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | +83.0% | +94.8% | +30.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.6% | +256.4% | -26.2% | +117.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +1060.3% | -24.6% | +418.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +22.3% | +24.9% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MANU and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANU currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs TKO's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.64x | 0.94x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.65 | $226.94 | $69.86 | $109.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.22 | $152.29 | $35.31 | $80.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +82.6% | +95.5% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 50.5 | 67.6 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 307K | 1.3M | 312K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MANU as "Hold", TKO as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", FWONK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for TKO (target: $237) vs -6.2% for MANU (target: $18). TKO is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.95 | $236.67 | $66.29 | $116.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 19 | 12 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.30 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
MSGE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
MANU vs TKO vs MSGE vs FWONK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 83. 0x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK?
On trailing P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the cheapest at 83. 0x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) delivered a total return of +256. 4%, compared to -26. 2% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1060% versus MSGE's -24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 166% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus -5. 0% for Manchester United plc — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 20. 3% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) trades at 38. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Formula One Group — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TKO: 26. 2% to $236. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK?
In this comparison, TKO (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MANU, MSGE, FWONK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MANU or TKO or MSGE or FWONK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 8% yield, +1060% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1060%, MSGE: -24. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MANU and TKO and MSGE and FWONK?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TKO pays a dividend while MANU, MSGE, FWONK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.