Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
HYFM
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
GRWG
GrowGeneration Corp.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.-97.3%
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

REIT - Industrial

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-72.6%
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$122M
5Y Perf.-99.6%

MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAPS logoMAPS
HYFM logoHYFM
GRWG logoGRWG
IIPR logoIIPR
CGC logoCGC
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationAgricultural - MachinerySpecialty RetailREIT - IndustrialDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$18M$5M$85M$1.62B$122M
Revenue (TTM)$175M$146M$162M$263M$294M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-65M$-24M$120M$-327M
Gross Margin94.9%10.2%26.8%60.3%22.8%
Operating Margin0.4%-35.8%-15.7%46.7%-24.1%
Forward P/E18.7x13.2x
Total Debt$27M$170M$29M$394M$348M
Cash & Equiv.$62M$26M$30M$48M$114M

MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAPS
HYFM
GRWG
IIPR
CGC
StockDec 20Apr 26Return
WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS)1002.9-97.1%
Hydrofarm Holdings … (HYFM)1000.2-99.8%
GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG)1002.7-97.3%
Innovative Industri… (IIPR)10027.4-72.6%
Canopy Growth Corpo… (CGC)1000.4-99.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IIPR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. WM Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. GRWG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
The Income Pick

MAPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.57
  • Rev growth -5.3%, EPS growth -74.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 20.1%, current ratio 2.34x
  • Beta 0.57, current ratio 2.34x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HYFM
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

HYFM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
GRWG
GrowGeneration Corp.
The Momentum Pick

GRWG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +25.7% vs HYFM's -75.4%
Best for: momentum
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 436.4% 10Y total return vs GRWG's -75.7%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 45.6% margin vs CGC's -111.0%
  • 13.5% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CGC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMAPS logoMAPS-5.3% revenue growth vs HYFM's -16.0%
ValueIIPR logoIIPRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsIIPR logoIIPR45.6% margin vs CGC's -111.0%
Stability / SafetyMAPS logoMAPSBeta 0.57 vs CGC's 1.90, lower leverage
DividendsIIPR logoIIPR13.5% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GRWG logoGRWG+25.7% vs HYFM's -75.4%
Efficiency (ROA)IIPR logoIIPR5.1% ROA vs CGC's -29.5%, ROIC 4.3% vs -10.2%

MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MAPSWM Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
91.2%$159M
Product and Service, Other
8.8%$15M
HYFMHydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$8M
GRWGGrowGeneration Corp.
FY 2024
Storage Solutions
100.0%$25M
IIPRInnovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CGCCanopy Growth Corporation
FY 2024
Canadian Cannabis Net Revenue
57.9%$156M
Storz And Bickel
27.3%$73M
International And Other Revenue
14.8%$40M
Other Revenue
0.0%$0

MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIIPRLAGGINGCGC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IIPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $294M annually — 2.0x HYFM's $146M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CGC's -111.0%. On growth, CGC holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…HYFM logoHYFMHydrofarm Holding…GRWG logoGRWGGrowGeneration Co…IIPR logoIIPRInnovative Indust…CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$175M$146M$162M$263M$294M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M-$23M-$14M$197M-$32M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$65M-$24M$120M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$14M-$8M-$10M$144M-$86M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.9%+10.2%+26.8%+60.3%+22.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%-35.8%-15.7%+46.7%-24.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.1%-44.5%-14.9%+45.6%-111.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.9%-5.7%-6.2%+54.7%-29.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.7%-33.3%+1.0%-3.8%+20.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.3%-22.7%+69.2%-1.0%+83.8%
IIPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MAPS and HYFM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 23% valuation discount to MAPS's 18.7x P/E.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…HYFM logoHYFMHydrofarm Holding…GRWG logoGRWGGrowGeneration Co…IIPR logoIIPRInnovative Indust…CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…
Market CapShares × price$18M$5M$85M$1.6B$122M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$18M$148M$84M$2.0B$293M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.69x-0.07x-3.55x14.40x-0.28x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-1.27x9.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x0.03x0.53x6.08x0.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.31x0.02x0.87x0.87x0.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.68x9.26x
Evenly matched — MAPS and HYFM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-43 for CGC. MAPS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HYFM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRWG scores 6/9 vs HYFM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…HYFM logoHYFMHydrofarm Holding…GRWG logoGRWGGrowGeneration Co…IIPR logoIIPRInnovative Indust…CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.5%-32.3%-22.9%+6.4%-43.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%-16.3%-15.2%+5.1%-29.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%-9.6%-16.9%+4.3%-10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.5%-12.1%-18.8%+5.8%-12.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953645
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.76x0.30x0.21x0.72x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$36M$143M-$929,000$346M$235M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$26M$30M$48M$114M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$27M$170M$29M$394M$348M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.77x6.67x-7.79x
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IIPR five years ago would be worth $4,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for HYFM. Over the past 12 months, GRWG leads with a +25.7% total return vs HYFM's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIPR at 4.5% vs HYFM's -56.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…HYFM logoHYFMHydrofarm Holding…GRWG logoGRWGGrowGeneration Co…IIPR logoIIPRInnovative Indust…CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.7%-35.0%-7.8%+18.3%-5.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.9%-75.4%+25.7%+20.3%-12.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.8%-91.9%-62.0%+14.1%-91.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%-99.8%-96.7%-50.0%-99.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%-99.8%-75.7%+436.4%-94.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.1%-56.8%-27.6%+4.5%-55.9%
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MAPS and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MAPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CGC's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs HYFM's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…HYFM logoHYFMHydrofarm Holding…GRWG logoGRWGGrowGeneration Co…IIPR logoIIPRInnovative Indust…CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x0.91x1.27x0.92x1.90x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.36$4.78$2.40$61.40$2.38
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.32$0.81$0.87$44.58$0.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.5%+21.8%+59.2%+92.2%+47.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.954.863.259.352.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M41K476K303K10.4M
Evenly matched — MAPS and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IIPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IIPR as "Hold", CGC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1180.5% upside for CGC (target: $14) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). IIPR is the only dividend payer here at 13.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…HYFM logoHYFMHydrofarm Holding…GRWG logoGRWGGrowGeneration Co…IIPR logoIIPRInnovative Indust…CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.00$14.47
# AnalystsCovering analysts1126
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises219
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$7.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.2%0.0%
IIPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IIPR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallInnovative Industrial Prope… (IIPR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAPS vs HYFM vs GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, WM Technology, Inc.

(MAPS) is the stronger pick with -5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC?

On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus WM Technology, Inc. at 18. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC?

Over the past 5 years, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) delivered a total return of -50. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus HYFM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WM Technology, Inc.

(MAPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Canopy Growth Corporation's 1. 90β — meaning CGC is approximately 233% more volatile than MAPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 76% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), WM Technology, Inc.

(MAPS) is pulling ahead at -5. 3% versus -16. 0% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GrowGeneration Corp. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for WM Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IIPR leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC?

Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -222. 4% for Canopy Growth Corporation — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus -43. 5% for CGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAPS leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGC: 1180.

5% to $14. 47.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC?

In this comparison, IIPR (13.

5% yield) pays a dividend. MAPS, HYFM, GRWG, CGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MAPS or HYFM or GRWG or IIPR or CGC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 13. 5% yield, +436. 4% 10Y return). Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIPR: +436. 4%, CGC: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MAPS and HYFM and GRWG and IIPR and CGC?

These companies operate in different sectors (MAPS (Technology) and HYFM (Industrials) and GRWG (Consumer Cyclical) and IIPR (Real Estate) and CGC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IIPR pays a dividend while MAPS, HYFM, GRWG, CGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MAPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HYFM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GRWG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IIPR

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CGC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MAPS and HYFM and GRWG and IIPR and CGC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MAPS: -9.7% · HYFM: -33.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.