Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Retail
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Retail | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $84M | $527M | $8.47B | $43.00B | $15.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $453M | $936M | $42.17B | $26.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-848K | $-54M | $387M | $1.31B | $896M |
| Gross Margin | 13.1% | 10.9% | 81.4% | 35.0% | 89.4% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | 33.1% | 63.3% | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 21.7x | 19.1x | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $4.22B | $4.82B | $9.99B | $3.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $183M | $5M | $1.86B | $599M |
MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| J.W. Mays, Inc. (MAYS) | 100 | 191.2 | +91.2% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 43.5 | -56.5% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.3 | +41.3% |
| CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) | 100 | 332.8 | +232.8% |
| Jones Lang LaSalle … (JLL) | 100 | 322.1 | +222.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAYS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 51.7%
- Beta 0.01 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage
ILPT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +177.7% vs MAYS's +7.0%
NNN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.19x
- 41.4% margin vs ILPT's -11.9%
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ILPT's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
CBRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 405.3% 10Y total return vs JLL's 191.8%
- 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs ILPT's 1.5%
JLL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.89 vs NNN's 1.94
- Lower P/E (14.5x vs 19.1x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.64
- 5.1% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 8.9% vs 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs ILPT's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.5x vs 19.1x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs ILPT's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ILPT's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.7% vs MAYS's +7.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 8.9% vs 2.2% |
MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories
JLL leads 2 • ILPT leads 1 • MAYS leads 0 • CBRE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 1938.7x MAYS's $22M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILPT's -11.9%. On growth, CBRE holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $453M | $936M | $42.2B | $26.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $944,208 | $306M | $867M | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$848,203 | -$54M | $387M | $1.3B | $896M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $564,125 | $65M | $464M | $897M | $971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +10.9% | +81.4% | +35.0% | +89.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +33.1% | +63.3% | +3.8% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -11.9% | +41.4% | +3.1% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +14.4% | +49.6% | +2.1% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | +4.0% | +4.1% | +18.1% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +57.6% | -2.0% | +98.1% | +192.1% |
Valuation Metrics
JLL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, JLL trades at a 48% valuation discount to CBRE's 38.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JLL offers better value at 1.23x vs CBRE's 3.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $527M | $8.5B | $43.0B | $15.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $4.6B | $13.3B | $51.1B | $18.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -613.91x | -7.91x | 21.50x | 38.10x | 20.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 21.68x | 19.06x | 14.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.93x | 3.27x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.73x | 14.59x | 15.85x | 24.82x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.72x | 1.17x | 9.14x | 1.06x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 0.58x | 1.90x | 4.58x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 651.78x | 8.69x | 12.69x | 36.05x | 15.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JLL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. JLL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JLL scores 8/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | -5.9% | +8.8% | +14.3% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -1.0% | +4.1% | +4.5% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +2.2% | +4.8% | +6.2% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.3% | +6.4% | +7.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 4.69x | 1.09x | 1.04x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $26M | $4.0B | $4.8B | $8.1B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $183M | $5M | $1.9B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $4.2B | $4.8B | $10.0B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.61x | 2.93x | 8.15x | 10.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBRE five years ago would be worth $16,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,803 for ILPT. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +177.7% total return vs MAYS's +7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 62.2% vs MAYS's -2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | +44.8% | +15.6% | -8.4% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.0% | +177.7% | +12.4% | +17.4% | +43.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | +326.6% | +15.1% | +100.6% | +149.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.7% | -62.0% | +15.0% | +68.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | -41.0% | +37.8% | +405.3% | +191.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.1% | +62.2% | +4.8% | +26.1% | +35.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAYS and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs MAYS's 66.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 1.53x | 0.16x | 1.11x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.99 | $8.19 | $46.03 | $174.27 | $363.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.32 | $2.84 | $38.90 | $118.81 | $211.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +96.6% | +96.7% | +84.2% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.8 | 71.4 | 58.4 | 52.2 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 312K | 1.5M | 1.9M | 420K |
Analyst Outlook
NNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ILPT as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", CBRE as "Buy", JLL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.0% upside for CBRE (target: $181) vs -6.4% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.30% vs ILPT's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.40 | $46.06 | $180.50 | $382.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 29 | 20 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +5.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $2.36 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.3% | +1.4% |
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). JLL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MAYS vs ILPT vs NNN vs CBRE vs JLL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL?
On trailing P/E, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is the cheapest at 20.
0x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated is actually cheaper at 14. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated wins at 0. 89x versus NNN REIT, Inc. 's 1. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL?
Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) delivered a total return of +68. 8%, compared to -62. 0% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +404. 2% versus ILPT's -40. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J.
W. Mays, Inc. (MAYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 53β — meaning ILPT is approximately 2786% more volatile than MAYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J. W. Mays, Inc. grew EPS 66. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBRE leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus -0. 7% for MAYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JLL leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus NNN REIT, Inc. 's 1. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for NNN REIT, Inc. — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBRE: 23. 0% to $180. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL?
In this comparison, NNN (5.
3% yield), ILPT (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MAYS, CBRE, JLL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAYS or ILPT or NNN or CBRE or JLL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNN: +37. 5%, JLL: +193. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAYS and ILPT and NNN and CBRE and JLL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JLL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ILPT, NNN pay a dividend while MAYS, CBRE, JLL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.